Julie Fierro1, Heidi Herrick2,3, Nicole Fregene3, Amina Khan4, Daria F Ferro2,5, Maria N Nelson2, Canita R Brent5, Christopher P Bonafide2,5, Sara B DeMauro2,3. 1. Division of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 3. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 4. Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 5. Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hospital Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Pulse oximetry monitoring is prescribed to children receiving home oxygen for chronic medical conditions associated with hypoxemia. Although home pediatric pulse oximetry is supported by national organizations, there is a lack of guidelines outlining indications and prescribing parameters. METHODS: A mixed-methods analysis of pediatric home pulse oximetry orders prescribed through the institutional home healthcare provider at a large US children's hospital 6/2018-7/2019 was retrospectively reviewed to determine prescribed alarm parameter limits and recommended interventions. Semi-structured qualitative interviews with pediatric providers managing patients receiving home oxygen and pulse oximetry were conducted to identify opportunities to improve home pulse oximetry prescribing practices. Interviews were analyzed using a modified content analysis approach to identify recurring themes. RESULTS: A total of 368 children received home pulse oximetry orders. Orders were most frequently prescribed on noncardiac medical floors (32%). Attending physicians were the most frequent ordering providers (52%). Frequency of use was prescribed in 96% of orders, however, just 70% were provided with specific instructions for interventions when alarms occurred. Provider role and clinical setting were significantly associated with the presence of a care plan. Provider interviews identified opportunities for improvement with the device, management of alarm parameter limits, and access to home monitor data. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated significant variability in home pulse oximetry prescribing practices. Provider interviews highlighted the importance of the provider-patient relationship and areas for improvement. There is an opportunity to create standardized guidelines that optimize the use of home monitoring devices for patients, families, and pulmonary providers.
INTRODUCTION: Pulse oximetry monitoring is prescribed to children receiving home oxygen for chronic medical conditions associated with hypoxemia. Although home pediatric pulse oximetry is supported by national organizations, there is a lack of guidelines outlining indications and prescribing parameters. METHODS: A mixed-methods analysis of pediatric home pulse oximetry orders prescribed through the institutional home healthcare provider at a large US children's hospital 6/2018-7/2019 was retrospectively reviewed to determine prescribed alarm parameter limits and recommended interventions. Semi-structured qualitative interviews with pediatric providers managing patients receiving home oxygen and pulse oximetry were conducted to identify opportunities to improve home pulse oximetry prescribing practices. Interviews were analyzed using a modified content analysis approach to identify recurring themes. RESULTS: A total of 368 children received home pulse oximetry orders. Orders were most frequently prescribed on noncardiac medical floors (32%). Attending physicians were the most frequent ordering providers (52%). Frequency of use was prescribed in 96% of orders, however, just 70% were provided with specific instructions for interventions when alarms occurred. Provider role and clinical setting were significantly associated with the presence of a care plan. Provider interviews identified opportunities for improvement with the device, management of alarm parameter limits, and access to home monitor data. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated significant variability in home pulse oximetry prescribing practices. Provider interviews highlighted the importance of the provider-patient relationship and areas for improvement. There is an opportunity to create standardized guidelines that optimize the use of home monitoring devices for patients, families, and pulmonary providers.
Authors: Julian Allen; Robert Zwerdling; Richard Ehrenkranz; Claude Gaultier; Robert Geggel; Anne Greenough; Ronald Kleinman; Anne Klijanowicz; Fernando Martinez; Ali Ozdemir; Howard B Panitch; Bruce Nickerson; Martin T Stein; Jean Tomezsko; John Van Der Anker Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2003-08-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Jean M Silvestri; George Lister; Michael J Corwin; Sheilah M Smok-Pearsall; Terry M Baird; David H Crowell; Jean Cantey-Kiser; Carl E Hunt; Larry Tinsley; Paula H Palmer; Rebecca S Mendenhall; Toke T Hoppenbrouwers; Michael R Neuman; Debra E Weese-Mayer; Marian Willinger Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2005-01
Authors: Bradford D Winters; Maria M Cvach; Christopher P Bonafide; Xiao Hu; Avinash Konkani; Michael F O'Connor; Jeffrey M Rothschild; Nicholas M Selby; Michele M Pelter; Barbara McLean; Sandra L Kane-Gill Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Christine Weirich Paine; Veena V Goel; Elizabeth Ely; Christopher D Stave; Shannon Stemler; Miriam Zander; Christopher P Bonafide Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2015-12-14 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Timothy P Stevens; Neil N Finer; Waldemar A Carlo; Peter G Szilagyi; Dale L Phelps; Michele C Walsh; Marie G Gantz; Abbot R Laptook; Bradley A Yoder; Roger G Faix; Jamie E Newman; Abhik Das; Barbara T Do; Kurt Schibler; Wade Rich; Nancy S Newman; Richard A Ehrenkranz; Myriam Peralta-Carcelen; Betty R Vohr; Deanne E Wilson-Costello; Kimberly Yolton; Roy J Heyne; Patricia W Evans; Yvonne E Vaucher; Ira Adams-Chapman; Elisabeth C McGowan; Anna Bodnar; Athina Pappas; Susan R Hintz; Michael J Acarregui; Janell Fuller; Ricki F Goldstein; Charles R Bauer; T Michael O'Shea; Gary J Myers; Rosemary D Higgins Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2014-04-13 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Don Hayes; Kevin C Wilson; Katelyn Krivchenia; Stephen M M Hawkins; Ian M Balfour-Lynn; David Gozal; Howard B Panitch; Mark L Splaingard; Lawrence M Rhein; Geoffrey Kurland; Steven H Abman; Timothy M Hoffman; Christopher L Carroll; Mary E Cataletto; Dmitry Tumin; Eyal Oren; Richard J Martin; Joyce Baker; Gregory R Porta; Deborah Kaley; Ann Gettys; Robin R Deterding Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 21.405