Michael J Parks1, Megan E Patrick2, David T Levy3, James F Thrasher4,5, Michael R Elliott2,6, Nancy L Fleischer7. 1. Institute for Translational Research in Children's Mental Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 2. Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 3. Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA. 4. Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. 5. Department of Tobacco Research, Center for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico. 6. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 7. Center for Social Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of research on within-person relationships between tobacco price and cigarette smoking initiation and progression in young adulthood. This project examines the within-person association between cigarette pack price and smoking initiation and progression between age 18 and 21/22, focusing on differences across subgroups. METHODS: Data came from the longitudinal Monitoring the Future (MTF) project. MTF examines drug use behaviors with nationally representative samples of 12th graders annually. Subsamples of 12th graders are annually selected and followed longitudinally. Among 12th graders from baseline years 2000-2014, we examined past 30-day cigarette smoking initiation among baseline never smokers (N = 15 280) and progression to daily smoking among youth who were not daily smokers at baseline (N = 26 998). We used hierarchical logistic regression and interaction terms to assess differences across sex, race/ethnicity, and parental education. RESULTS: The within-person relationship between pack price and smoking indicated that a one-dollar increase in pack price corresponded with a 72% decrease in the odds of initiation (AOR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.18, 0.44) and 70% decrease in the odds of progression to daily smoking (AOR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.21, 0.44). There was a linear age trend for both smoking initiation and progression. There were no statistically significant interactions between price and demographics, making it difficult to disentangle differences across subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to increased cigarette prices during young adulthood was associated with lower odds of cigarette smoking initiation and progression. Additional policies and programs beyond cigarettes prices could help reduce tobacco-related disparities in smoking initiation and progression among young adults. IMPLICATIONS: There is a strong, within-person relationship between cigarette prices and smoking initiation and progression during the transition to young adulthood: higher prices are associated with decreased odds of both initiation and progression. Cigarette taxation can help to prevent smoking initiation and progression among youth, but it is less clear how taxes are associated with disparities in smoking experienced by certain subgroups. We could not draw definitive conclusions about the impact of cigarette prices on tobacco-related disparities. Tobacco taxes should be increased on a regular basis to ensure young adults experience within-person increases in prices, and complementary programs geared toward reducing tobacco-related disparities among young adults should be promoted.
BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of research on within-person relationships between tobacco price and cigarette smoking initiation and progression in young adulthood. This project examines the within-person association between cigarette pack price and smoking initiation and progression between age 18 and 21/22, focusing on differences across subgroups. METHODS: Data came from the longitudinal Monitoring the Future (MTF) project. MTF examines drug use behaviors with nationally representative samples of 12th graders annually. Subsamples of 12th graders are annually selected and followed longitudinally. Among 12th graders from baseline years 2000-2014, we examined past 30-day cigarette smoking initiation among baseline never smokers (N = 15 280) and progression to daily smoking among youth who were not daily smokers at baseline (N = 26 998). We used hierarchical logistic regression and interaction terms to assess differences across sex, race/ethnicity, and parental education. RESULTS: The within-person relationship between pack price and smoking indicated that a one-dollar increase in pack price corresponded with a 72% decrease in the odds of initiation (AOR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.18, 0.44) and 70% decrease in the odds of progression to daily smoking (AOR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.21, 0.44). There was a linear age trend for both smoking initiation and progression. There were no statistically significant interactions between price and demographics, making it difficult to disentangle differences across subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to increased cigarette prices during young adulthood was associated with lower odds of cigarette smoking initiation and progression. Additional policies and programs beyond cigarettes prices could help reduce tobacco-related disparities in smoking initiation and progression among young adults. IMPLICATIONS: There is a strong, within-person relationship between cigarette prices and smoking initiation and progression during the transition to young adulthood: higher prices are associated with decreased odds of both initiation and progression. Cigarette taxation can help to prevent smoking initiation and progression among youth, but it is less clear how taxes are associated with disparities in smoking experienced by certain subgroups. We could not draw definitive conclusions about the impact of cigarette prices on tobacco-related disparities. Tobacco taxes should be increased on a regular basis to ensure young adults experience within-person increases in prices, and complementary programs geared toward reducing tobacco-related disparities among young adults should be promoted.
Authors: Jerald G Bachman; Patrick M O'Malley; Lloyd D Johnston; John E Schulenberg; John M Wallace Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Xin Xu; Michael F Pesko; Michael A Tynan; Robert B Gerzoff; Ann M Malarcher; Terry F Pechacek Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jennifer Weuve; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; M Maria Glymour; Todd L Beck; Neelum T Aggarwal; Robert S Wilson; Denis A Evans; Carlos F Mendes de Leon Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Cheryl L Perry; Adriana Pérez; Meagan Bluestein; Nicholas Garza; Udoka Obinwa; Christian Jackson; Stephanie L Clendennen; Alexandra Loukas; Melissa B Harrell Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Nancy L Fleischer; J Travis Donahoe; M Chandler McLeod; James F Thrasher; David T Levy; Michael R Elliott; Rafael Meza; Megan E Patrick Journal: Tob Control Date: 2020-04-08 Impact factor: 6.953
Authors: Michael J Parks; Megan E Patrick; David T Levy; James F Thrasher; Michael R Elliott; Nancy L Fleischer Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 5.012