Literature DB >> 34633295

A phase sensitive x-ray breast tomosynthesis system: Preliminary patient images with cancer lesions.

Muhammad U Ghani1, Laurie L Fajardo2, Farid Omoumi1, Aimin Yan1, Peter Jenkins2, Molly Wong1, Yuhua Li1, Michael E Peterson2, Edward J Callahan2, Stephen L Hillis3, Bin Zheng1, Xizeng Wu4, Hong Liu1.   

Abstract

Phase-sensitive x-ray imaging continues to attract research for its ability to visualize weakly absorbing details like those often encountered in biology and medicine. We have developed and assembled the first inline-based high-energy phase sensitive breast tomosynthesis (PBT) system, which is currently undergoing patient imaging testing at a clinical site. The PBT system consists of a microfocus polychromatic x-ray source and a direct conversion-based flat panel detector coated with a 1 mm thick amorphous selenium layer allowing a high detective quantum efficiency at high energies. The PBT system scans a compressed breast over 15° with 9 angular projection views. The high-energy scan parameters are carefully selected to ensure similar or lower mean glandular dose levels to the clinical standard of care systems. Phase retrieval and data binning are applied to the phase contrast angular projection views and a filtered back-projection algorithm is used to reconstruct the final images. This article reports the distributions of radiation dose versus thickness of the compressed breasts at 59 and 89 kV and sample PBT images acquired from 3 patients. Preliminary PBT images demonstrate the feasibility of this new imaging modality to acquire breast images at lower radiation dose as compared to the clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system with enhanced lesion characteristics (i.e. lesion spiculation and margins).
© 2021 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast imaging; high energy x-rays; patient images; phase contrast imaging; phase retrieval; tomosynthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34633295      PMCID: PMC8635279          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac2ea6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  32 in total

1.  Mammography with synchrotron radiation: phase-detection techniques.

Authors:  F Arfelli; V Bonvicini; A Bravin; G Cantatore; E Castelli; L D Palma; M D Michiel; M Fabrizioli; R Longo; R H Menk; A Olivo; S Pani; D Pontoni; P Poropat; M Prest; A Rashevsky; M Ratti; L Rigon; G Tromba; A Vacchi; E Vallazza; F Zanconati
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol.

Authors:  D R Dance; C L Skinner; K C Young; J R Beckett; C J Kotre
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  First application of computed radiology to mammography with synchrotron radiation.

Authors:  E Quai; R Longo; F Zanconati; G Jaconelli; M Tonutti; A Abrami; F Arfelli; D Dreossi; G Tromba; M A Cova
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography.

Authors:  X Wu; G T Barnes; D M Tucker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Rafferty; Jeong Mi Park; Liane E Philpotts; Steven P Poplack; Jules H Sumkin; Elkan F Halpern; Loren T Niklason
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography.

Authors:  X Wu; E L Gingold; G T Barnes; D M Tucker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Detectability comparison between a high energy x-ray phase sensitive and mammography systems in imaging phantoms with varying glandular-adipose ratios.

Authors:  Muhammad U Ghani; Molly D Wong; Di Wu; Bin Zheng; Laurie L Fajardo; Aimin Yan; Janis Fuh; Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Mammography with synchrotron radiation: first clinical experience with phase-detection technique.

Authors:  Edoardo Castelli; Maura Tonutti; Fulvia Arfelli; Renata Longo; Emilio Quaia; Luigi Rigon; Daniela Sanabor; Fabrizio Zanconati; Diego Dreossi; Alessando Abrami; Elisa Quai; Paola Bregant; Katia Casarin; Valentina Chenda; Ralf Hendrik Menk; Tatjana Rokvic; Alessandro Vascotto; Giuliana Tromba; Maria Assunta Cova
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Free propagation phase-contrast breast CT provides higher image quality than cone-beam breast-CT at low radiation doses: a feasibility study on human mastectomies.

Authors:  S Pacilè; C Dullin; P Baran; M Tonutti; C Perske; U Fischer; J Albers; F Arfelli; D Dreossi; K Pavlov; A Maksimenko; S C Mayo; Y I Nesterets; S Tavakoli Taba; S Lewis; P C Brennan; T E Gureyev; G Tromba; S Wienbeck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.