Literature DB >> 34632919

Plasma KRAS mutations predict the early recurrence after surgical resection of pancreatic cancer.

Soichiro Ako1, Hironari Kato1, Kazuhiro Nouso2, Hideaki Kinugasa1, Hiroyuki Terasawa1, Hiroshi Matushita1, Saimon Takada1, Yosuke Saragai1, Sho Mizukawa1, Shinichiro Muro1, Daisuke Uchida1, Takeshi Tomoda1, Kazuyuki Matsumoto1, Shigeru Horiguchi1, Daisuke Nobuoka3, Ryuichi Yoshida3, Yuzo Umeda3, Takahito Yagi3, Hiroyuki Okada1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The technique to analyze circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in body fluid (so-called "liquid biopsy") is recently developed. AIMS: Our aim was to assess the utility of liquid biopsy for predicting progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after surgical resection or chemotherapy.
METHODS: A total of 72 patients with PDAC were retrospectively enrolled for this study, 33 treated surgically and 39 given chemotherapy, either FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin/irinotecan/fluorouracil/leucovorin) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. Prior to treatment, patients were screened for the presence of KRAS mutations (G12D and G12V) in plasma using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction, and outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: KRAS mutations were identified in plasma samples of 12 patients (36%) underwent surgical resection. Patients with plasma KRAS mutations had significantly shorter disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (p < .01 and p = .01, respectively). Of 10 clinical variables analyzed, plasma KRAS mutation was the factor predictive of DFS in multivariate analysis (RR = 3.58, 95% CI: 1.36-9.60; p = .01). Although 12 patients (31%) given chemotherapy tested positive for plasma KRAS mutations, there was no demonstrable relation between plasma KRAS mutations and progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) (p = .35 and p = .68, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PDAC, detection of KRAS mutations in plasma proved independently predictive of early recurrence after surgical resection but did not correlate with PFS following chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; disease-free survival; droplet digital polymerase chain reaction; progression-fee survival; surgical resection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34632919      PMCID: PMC8726677          DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2021.1980312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther        ISSN: 1538-4047            Impact factor:   4.875


  42 in total

1.  The effect on prognosis of postoperative CA 19-9 level in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Saadettin Kilickap; Cagatay Arslan
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.339

2.  FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Thierry Conroy; Françoise Desseigne; Marc Ychou; Olivier Bouché; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Antoine Adenis; Jean-Luc Raoul; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Denis Péré-Vergé; Catherine Delbaldo; Eric Assenat; Bruno Chauffert; Pierre Michel; Christine Montoto-Grillot; Michel Ducreux
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer: long-term survival from a phase III trial.

Authors:  David Goldstein; Robert Hassan El-Maraghi; Pascal Hammel; Volker Heinemann; Volker Kunzmann; Javier Sastre; Werner Scheithauer; Salvatore Siena; Josep Tabernero; Luis Teixeira; Giampaolo Tortora; Jean-Luc Van Laethem; Rosemary Young; Darryl Neil Penenberg; Brian Lu; Alfredo Romano; Daniel D Von Hoff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Cancer Statistics, 2021.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Hannah E Fuchs; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  CA19-9 as a predictor of tumor response and survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nazik Hammad; Lance K Heilbrun; Philip A Philip; Anthony F Shields; Mark M Zalupski; Raghu Venkatramanamoorthy; Bassel F El-Rayes
Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.601

6.  Investigation of transrenal KRAS mutation in late stage NSCLC patients correlates to disease progression.

Authors:  Xiaojiang Wang; Qinghua Meng; Chuanhai Wang; Fajiu Li; Zhiyang Zhu; Shuang Liu; Yi Shi; Jie Huang; Shi Chen; Chenghong Li
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Relationship between serum CA19-9 and CEA levels and prognosis of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Lei Wu; Peijun Huang; Fang Wang; Daqian Li; Erfu Xie; Yan Zhang; Shiyang Pan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-12

8.  Preoperative predictors for early recurrence of resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Kohei Nishio; Kenjiro Kimura; Ryosuke Amano; Sadaaki Yamazoe; Go Ohrira; Bunzo Nakata; Kosei Hirakawa; Masaichi Ohira
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  KRAS mutations in cell-free DNA from preoperative and postoperative sera as a pancreatic cancer marker: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yutaka Nakano; Minoru Kitago; Sachiko Matsuda; Yuki Nakamura; Yusuke Fujita; Shunichi Imai; Masahiro Shinoda; Hiroshi Yagi; Yuta Abe; Taizo Hibi; Yoko Fujii-Nishimura; Ayano Takeuchi; Yutaka Endo; Osamu Itano; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Non-invasive urine testing of EGFR activating mutation and T790M resistance mutation in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  David Berz; Victoria M Raymond; Jordan H Garst; Mark G Erlander
Journal:  Exp Hematol Oncol       Date:  2016-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.