| Literature DB >> 34632415 |
Silja Heilmann1, Henrik Semb1,2, Pia Nyeng3.
Abstract
We have developed a protocol to quantify the position of a cell in a branched structure based on two-dimensional microscopy images of tissue sections. Biological branched structures include organs such as the lungs, kidneys, and pancreas. In these organs, cell fate has been correlated with position, based on a qualitative estimate. However, a quantitative means of evaluating the cell position has been lacking. With this protocol, the correlation between cell fate and cell position was measured in mouse embryonic pancreas. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Nyeng et al. (2019).Entities:
Keywords: Bioinformatics; Cell Biology; Microscopy
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34632415 PMCID: PMC8488404 DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100806
Source DB: PubMed Journal: STAR Protoc ISSN: 2666-1667
Figure 1Examples of output images
(A) Example image number/answer for the 3rd question prompted during the run of demoScript_OneImage_ManualInput.m. Segmentation should cover all nuclei (but not more than that) and nuclei should not have holes in them.
(B) Example image number/answer for the 4th question prompted during the run of demoScript_OneImage_ManualInput.m. Segmentation should cover as much of nuclei as possible while not merging them. (Very few merges are ok).
(C) Example image number/answer for the 5th question prompted during the run of demoScript_OneImage_ManualInput.m. Segmentation should separate most nuclei while losing the least. Note: Smoother boundaries are better than nuclei separation.
(D) Example image number/answer for the 6th question prompted during the run of demoScript_OneImage_ManualInput.m. Segmentation should optimally merge no nuclei. (Very few merges are ok).
(E) Example of the final output of the segmentDAPIImage() image function. (Note: the output is a binary image, but different regions/connected components are here shown with different colors to emphasize the segmentation).
(F) Output figure during a call of the function returnTableWithCellPairInt(), where plot_yes_no=1. White lines show the cell neighbor pairs line scans performed in the image. Inspecting this plot can help you find the appropriate value of nucleiD, such that many linescans are performed but not too many that connect cells which are not actual neighbors. Note: you do not need to use the same value for nucleiD as you did for segmentDAPIimage(). The scale bars are 10 μm.
Appropriate controls for antibody staining and imaging (Lee and Kitaoka, 2018)
| Control name | Tissue | Antibody treatment | Purpose | Specific handling during staining |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative control | Same as sample | -No primary and secondary antibodies | To determine autofluorescence of tissue | Step 6: Leave section in blocking buffer |
| Secondary antibody only control | Same as sample | -No primary antibody | To control for unspecific secondary antibody binding and crossreactivity | Step 6: Leave section in blocking buffer |
| Optional: “Leave one out” controls (only when multiplexing antibodies) | Same as sample | -All primary antibodies except one | This control allows you to take into account how the other antibodies in your panel affect the left out antibody: You can for instance detect bleed-through into the channel were the left out antibody is acquired | Step 6: Omit one primary antibody from your antibody panel |
Figure 2Methods and equipment
Slide holder for washing steps, PAP pen and humidified chamber with numbered slides inside.
Antibody panel used to generate the test image dataset
| Primary antibody solution | Final dilution | Amount for 9 samples (1 mL) |
|---|---|---|
| SOX9 antibody produced in rabbit | 1:1000 | 1.0 μL |
| CPA1 antibody produced in goat | 1:100 | 10 μL |
| P120CTN antibody produced in mouse | 1:400 | 2.5 μL |
| Blocking buffer | n/a | 986.5 μL |
Secondary antibodies used to generate the test image dataset
| Secondary antibody solution 1 | Final dilution | Amount for 9 samples (1 mL) |
|---|---|---|
| Anti-Rabbit antibody produced in donkey and conjugated to Alexa-Fluor 488 | 1:1000 | 1.0 μL |
| Anti-goat antibody produced in donkey and conjugated to Cy-5 | 1:1000 | 1.0 μL |
| Blocking buffer | n/a | 998μL |
| Total | n/a | 1000 μL |
| Anti-Mouse IgG, Fcγ subclass 1 specific, polyclonal antibody produced in goat and conjugated to Rhodamine Red-X | 1:1000 | 1.0 μL |
| Blocking buffer | n/a | 999 μL |
| Total | n/a | 1000 μL |
Figure 3Example input image
Stitched image of an entire pancreatic section for embryonic day 14.5 mouse embryo. The pancreas was stained for DAPI (nuclear marker), P120CTN (membrane marker of the epithelium), SOX9 and CPA1.
(A) The merged image shows DAPI, P120CTN, SOX9 and CPA1.
(B–E)(B) DAPI, (C) P120CTN, (D) SOX9 and (E) CPA1.
The scale bars are 100 μm.
Figure 4Illustration of principle of method
(A) Confocal image of E14.5 pancreas stained for P120CTN and DAPI.
(B–D) Black-green color map shows local distance to convex hull/mid branch/side branches respectively. (B) White line: convex hull of epithelial outline. (C) Magenta line: Mid branch of skeletonization of epithelial outline. (D) Magenta lines: Side branches of skeletonization of epithelial outline.
(E) Color map shows tip score value in different locations for the image shown in A. Figure reprinted with permission from (Nyeng et al., 2019).
Scale bar in A is 30 μm.
Figure 6Example of data plots from a larger dataset (linescans)
(A) Example image of neighbor cell pair with linescan (white line) and P120CTN maximum intensity value along curve (green dot). Note that the position of the maximum intensity value coincides with the position of the double membrane between cells.
(B) Example of P120CTN linescan extracted between neighbor cells shown in image in panel (A).
(C) Confocal image of E14.5 pancreas stained for P120CTN and DAPI. Yellow dots: cell positions. White lines: linescans between neighboring cells.
(D) P120CTN intensity between cell pairs versus tip score. Data comes from the original dataset (Nyeng et al., 2019) and contains n=4 embryos (24 images). Note that the tip score scale is different in this dataset. n= 3305–3400 cell pairs per class.
The graphs in C and E show median ± confidence interval. ns=not significant. ∗∗p<0.01, ∗∗∗∗p<0.0001 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Figure reprinted with permission from (Nyeng et al., 2019). Scale bars: (A) 5 μm, (C) 20 μm.
Figure 5Data plots from test dataset (tip score, intensity, and linescans)
(A) SOX9 intensity versus tip score bins. Data comes from N=3 embryos (7 images).
(B) P120CTN max value between cell pairs versus tip score bins. Data comes from N=3 embryos (7 images). The graphs show median ± confidence interval as notches. ns=not significant, ∗∗∗p<0.001, ∗∗∗∗p<0.0001 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The following P-values were additionally calculated (Wilcoxon signed-rank test): For plot A: p<0.0001 for group 1,2,3 (counting from the left side of the plot) compared to group 5, p<0.01 for group 4 compared to group 5. Groups 1,2,3,4 were not significantly different from each other. For plot B: Group 1 compared to group 6 not significantly different. P<0.05 for group 2 compared to group 6 (group 6 has very few observations as n=144 cells).
Figure 7Mean tip score of CPA1 positive versus CPA1 negative cells
Data is from the original dataset (Nyeng et al., 2019) and contains n=4 embryos (24 images). Note that the tip score scale is different in this dataset. n= 3305–3400 cell pairs per class. The graph shows median ± confidence interval as notches. ∗∗∗∗p<0.0001 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Figure reprinted with permission from (Nyeng et al., 2019).
Blocking Buffer
| Reagent | Final concentration | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1 M TRIS-HCL pH 7.5 | 0.1 M | 1000 mL |
| NaCl | 0.15 M | 8.77 g |
| Blocking reagent | 0.5% | 5.00 g |
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| Goat polyclonal anti-CPA1 (dilution 1:100) | R&D Systems | Cat #: AF2765 |
| Mouse polyclonal anti-p120ctn (pp120) (dilution 1:400) | BD Transduction Labs | Cat #: 610134 |
| Rabbit polyclonal anti-Sox9 (dilution 1:1000) | Millipore | Cat #: AB5535 RRID: |
| Secondary antibody Rhodamine Red™-X (RRX) AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, Fcγ subclass 1 specific (min X Hu, Bov, Rb Sr Prot) (dilution 1:1000) | Jackson ImmunoResearch | cat# 115-295-205 |
| Secondary antibody Cy™5 AffiniPure Donkey Anti-Goat IgG (H+L) (dilution 1:1000) | Jackson ImmunoResearch | Cat #: 705-175-147 |
| Secondary antibody Alexa Fluor® 488 AffiniPure Fab Fragment Donkey Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) (dilution 1:1000) | Jackson ImmunoResearch | Cat #: 711-547-003 |
| PBS tablets pH 7.4 (for 500 ML) | Fisher Scientific | Cat #: 11510546 |
| Sterile PBS w Mg/Ca | Gibco | Cat#: 14040083 |
| Paraformaldehyde powder | VWR | Cat #: 28794.295 |
| DAPI molecular grade | VWR | Cat #: APLIA4099.0010 |
| NaCl | Merck | Cat #: 1.06404.0500 |
| TRIZMA-HCl | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat #:T5941 |
| Triton X-1000 | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat #: X-100 |
| Citric Acid NORMAPUR | Fisher Scientific | Cat #:15672880 |
| Tri-sodium citrate (dihydrate) | Merck | Cat #: 1064481000 |
| Sucrose (Saccharose NORMAPUR analytical reagent) | Fisher Scientific | Cat #:10647421 |
| Blocking Reagent | Akoya Biosciences | Cat #: SKU FP1012 |
| Original image data test set | This paper | Heilmann, Silja; Nyeng, Pia (2021), “Pancreas_sample_images”, Mendeley Data, V1, |
| Mouse: C57BL/6BomTac | Taconic | Cat #: B6JBOM-F/M |
| Fiji 2.0/ImageJ version 1.51u or more recent | ( | RRID: |
| MATLAB version R2018a or later | MathWorks | RRID: |
| ZEN black edition including stitching module | Zeiss | RRID: |
| Original custom MATLAB functions: tipScoreIm(), segmentDAPIimage(), returnTableWithCellInt(), returnTableWithCellPairInt() | This paper | |
| Dumont #5 Forceps in Inox-Biology | Fine Science Tools | Cat#: #5SF |
| Stereoscope for embryo dissection | Nikon | Cat# SMZ1270 |
| Leica Cryostat | Leica | Cat #:CM1950 |
| Tissue-Tek® O.C.T.™ Compound Cryo Embedding Medium | Sakura | Cat #:4583 |
| Cryomold® Intermediate 15 | Sakura | Cat #:4566 |
| Thermo Scientific™ SuperFrost Plus™ Adhesion Slides 75 | Fisher Scientific | Cat #:10149870 |
| PAP pen (liquid blocker) | Merck | Cat #: Z377821-1EA |
| High precision cover glasses 24 | Marienfeld distributed by VWR | Cat #: MARI0107242 |
| DAKO Mounting Medium | Agilent Technologies | Cat #:CS70330-2 |
| Humidity chamber: Simport Scientific Staintray System with black lid (20 slides). Simport™ M920-2 | Fisher Scientific | Cat #:11610581 |
| Tissue-Tek® 24-Slide Holder with Detachable Handle | Sakura | Cat #:4457 |
| Tissue-Tek® Staining Dish White | Sakura | Cat #:4465 |
| Micropipettes | N/A | N/A |
| Zeiss LSM 780 inverted confocal scanning microscope | Zeiss | N/A |
| Objective: Plan Apochromat 10 | Zeiss | N/A |
| Objective: Plan-Apochromat 40 | Zeiss | N/A |