Literature DB >> 34632277

Just How Effective is Direct Instruction?

Lee Mason1,2, Maria Otero1,3.   

Abstract

Despite overwhelming evidence in support of Direct Instruction, this research-validated curriculum has not been widely embraced by teachers or school administrators. The Direct Instruction model, developed and refined by Engelmann and colleagues over the past 50 years, has been the focus of numerous research studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Although its efficacy cannot be doubted, the significance of Direct Instruction's impact may be misunderstood. We attempt to clarify the importance of Direct Instruction with help from the binomial effect-size display. Binomial effect-size displays allow for intuitive and informative data-based decision making by clearly conveying the real-world importance of treatment outcomes through a juxtaposition of the relative proportions of success. The limitations of analyzing effect sizes in absolute terms are discussed. Using the binomial effect-size display as a framework, we present a series of dichotomies in an attempt to answer the question: Just how effective is Direct Instruction? © Association for Behavior Analysis International 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binomial effect size display; Direct instruction; Effect size; Effective schools

Year:  2021        PMID: 34632277      PMCID: PMC8476697          DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00295-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci        ISSN: 2520-8969


  10 in total

1.  Biases of success rate differences shown in binomial effect size displays.

Authors:  Louis M Hsu
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2004-06

2.  Evaluation of a program of systematic instructional procedures for extremely poor retarded children.

Authors:  N G Haring; D A Krug
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1975-05

3.  Effects of small-group reading instruction and curriculum differences for students most at risk in kindergartenL: two-year results for secondary- and tertiary-level interventions.

Authors:  Debra Kamps; Mary Abbott; Charles Greenwood; Howard Wills; Mary Veerkamp; Jorun Kaufman
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr

4.  Examining the core: relations among reading curricula, poverty, and first through third grade reading achievement.

Authors:  Elizabeth Coyne Crowe; Carol McDonald Connor; Yaacov Petscher
Journal:  J Sch Psychol       Date:  2009-06

5.  Student error patterns as a function of curriculum design: teaching fractions to remedial high school students and high school students with learning disabilities.

Authors:  B Kelly; R Gersten; D Carnine
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  1990-01

6.  What is evidence-based behavior analysis?

Authors:  Tristram Smith
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2013

7.  The Evidence-Based Practice of Applied Behavior Analysis.

Authors:  Timothy A Slocum; Ronnie Detrich; Susan M Wilczynski; Trina D Spencer; Teri Lewis; Katie Wolfe
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2014-04-29

8.  Direct language instruction and interactive language instruction with language delayed preschool children: a comparison study.

Authors:  K N Cole; P S Dale
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1986-06

9.  Boosting reading skills by direct instruction.

Authors:  A B Branwhite
Journal:  Br J Educ Psychol       Date:  1983-11

10.  Beginning reading instruction for children with minimal brain dysfunction.

Authors:  C L Stein; J Goldman
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  1980-04
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  The Evidence is in the Design.

Authors:  Janet S Twyman
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-09-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.