Literature DB >> 34631982

Hepatitis C virus subtyping in Uttarakhand, India: a comparative study.

Kuhu Chatterjee1, Deepjyoti Kalita1, Balram Ji Omar1, Rohit Gupta2, Mithilesh Kumar Jha1,3, Pratima Gupta1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare Reverse Hybridisation Assay with conventional sequencing for determination of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype and Subtypes. Anti-HCV antibody was determined followed by HCV RNA extraction which was used for (1) viral load determination (2) qualitative real-time PCR RHA for genotyping and (3) conventional sequencing. Compared to conventional sequencing, accuracy of RHA results was 96.55% for determination of genotype (κ = 0.93) and 89.66% for subtype (κ = 0.85). Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) of the qualitative PCR were 82.29%, 100%, 44.44% and 100% respectively with an accuracy of 86.84%. RHA is a less time consuming and cheaper method for determination of HCV genotype and subtype yet results must be interpreted with caution and quality control monitoring should be strictly followed to ensure validity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13337-021-00729-9. © Indian Virological Society 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatitis C virus; Genotype; Subtype; Reverse hybridisation assay; Conventional sequencing

Year:  2021        PMID: 34631982      PMCID: PMC8473521          DOI: 10.1007/s13337-021-00729-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virusdisease        ISSN: 2347-3584


  16 in total

Review 1.  Genetic heterogeneity of hepatitis C virus: quasispecies and genotypes.

Authors:  J Bukh; R H Miller; R H Purcell
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.115

2.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Evaluation of a reverse hybridization assay for genotyping of hepatitis C virus.

Authors:  S Zeuzem; B Ruster; J H Lee; T Stripf; W K Roth
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 25.083

4.  Comparison of three different HCV genotyping methods: core, NS5B sequence analysis and line probe assay.

Authors:  Qingxian Cai; Zhixin Zhao; Ying Liu; Xiaoqiong Shao; Zhiliang Gao
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.101

5.  Comparison of hepatitis C virus genotyping by 5' noncoding region- and core-based reverse transcriptase PCR assay with sequencing and use of the assay for determining subtype distribution in India.

Authors:  Kavita S Lole; Jyotsna A Jha; Sandhya P Shrotri; Badri N Tandon; V G Mohan Prasad; Vidya A Arankalle
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Distribution of hepatitis C genotypes in Uttar Pradesh, India; rare genotype 4 detected.

Authors:  Shantanu Prakash; Suruchi Shukla; Vangala Ramakrishna; Amita Jain
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.327

7.  Comparison of Sanger sequencing for hepatitis C virus genotyping with a commercial line probe assay in a tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Sylvie Goletti; Siméon Zuyten; Léonie Goeminne; Chris Verhofstede; Hector Rodriguez-Villalobos; Monique Bodeus; Peter Stärkel; Yves Horsmans; Benoît Kabamba-Mukadi
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  Hepatitis C virus genotyping: interrogation of the 5' untranslated region cannot accurately distinguish genotypes 1a and 1b.

Authors:  Zhenyu Chen; Karen E Weck
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Identification of genotypes of hepatitis C virus by sequence comparisons in the core, E1 and NS-5 regions.

Authors:  P Simmonds; D B Smith; F McOmish; P L Yap; J Kolberg; M S Urdea; E C Holmes
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.891

10.  Consequences of inaccurate hepatitis C virus genotyping on the costs of prescription of direct antiviral agents in an Italian district.

Authors:  Ennio Polilli; Valeria Cento; Umberto Restelli; Francesca Ceccherini-Silberstein; Marianna Aragri; Velia Chiara Di Maio; Antonina Sciacca; Fiorenzo Santoleri; Paolo Fazii; Alberto Costantini; Carlo Federico Perno; Giustino Parruti
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2016-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.