| Literature DB >> 34631982 |
Kuhu Chatterjee1, Deepjyoti Kalita1, Balram Ji Omar1, Rohit Gupta2, Mithilesh Kumar Jha1,3, Pratima Gupta1.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare Reverse Hybridisation Assay with conventional sequencing for determination of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype and Subtypes. Anti-HCV antibody was determined followed by HCV RNA extraction which was used for (1) viral load determination (2) qualitative real-time PCR RHA for genotyping and (3) conventional sequencing. Compared to conventional sequencing, accuracy of RHA results was 96.55% for determination of genotype (κ = 0.93) and 89.66% for subtype (κ = 0.85). Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) of the qualitative PCR were 82.29%, 100%, 44.44% and 100% respectively with an accuracy of 86.84%. RHA is a less time consuming and cheaper method for determination of HCV genotype and subtype yet results must be interpreted with caution and quality control monitoring should be strictly followed to ensure validity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13337-021-00729-9. © Indian Virological Society 2021.Entities:
Keywords: Hepatitis C virus; Genotype; Subtype; Reverse hybridisation assay; Conventional sequencing
Year: 2021 PMID: 34631982 PMCID: PMC8473521 DOI: 10.1007/s13337-021-00729-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virusdisease ISSN: 2347-3584