| Literature DB >> 34631820 |
Elisa Rauseo1,2, Cristian Izquierdo Morcillo3, Zahra Raisi-Estabragh1,2, Polyxeni Gkontra3, Nay Aung1,2, Karim Lekadir3, Steffen E Petersen1,2,4,5.
Abstract
Background: Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and cerebrovascular disease are two closely inter-related clinical entities. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) radiomics may capture subtle cardiac changes associated with these two diseases providing new insights into the brain-heart interactions. Objective: To define the CMR radiomics signatures for IHD and cerebrovascular disease and study their incremental value for disease discrimination over conventional CMR indices.Entities:
Keywords: brain-heart axis; cardiovascular magnetic resonance; cerebrovascular disease; ischaemic heart disease; myocardial infarction; radiomics; stroke
Year: 2021 PMID: 34631820 PMCID: PMC8494975 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.716577
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1Study cohorts selection process. IHD, Ischaemic heart disease; MI, myocardial infarction; IS, ischaemic stroke.
Baseline characteristics and conventional CMR measurements for each disease group and the healthy controls.
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Age, years | 67 ± 6 | 68 ± 6 | 67 ± 6 | 67 ± 7 | 59 ± 7 |
| Female gender, | 210 (27) | 99 (37) | 89 (17) | 37 (35) | 420 (54) |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 28.1 ± 4.3 | 27.8 ± 4.6 | 28.2 ± 4.3 | 28.1 ± 4.7 | 24.4 ± 2.7 |
| Body surface area (m2) | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± 0.3 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.2 |
| Diabetes, | 70 (9) | 17 (6) | 41 (8) | 6 (6) | – |
| Hypertension, | 343 (44) | 96 (36) | 255 (48) | 40 (37) | – |
| High cholesterol, | 452 (58) | 119 (44) | 328 (62) | 42 (39) | – |
| Smoker, | 62 (8) | 16 (6) | 52 (10) | 9 (8) | – |
|
| |||||
| LVEDV index (ml/m2) | 81.2 ± 17.1 | 76.1 ± 14.4 | 86.0 ± 19.2 | 75.9 ± 15.0 | 81.1 ± 14.0 |
| LVESV index (ml/m2) | 35.01 ± 12.9 | 31.6 ± 8.5 | 39.2 ± 15.7 | 31.7 ± 8.6 | 33.3 ± 8.0 |
| LVSV index (ml/m2) | 46.2 ± 8.6 | 44.5 ± 8.8 | 46.8 ± 8.9 | 44.2 ± 9.0 | 47.8 ± 9.1 |
| LVM index (g/m2) | 48.9 ± 9.5 | 46.9 ± 9.3 | 51.1 ± 9.8 | 46.3 ± 8.0 | 45.2 ± 9.5 |
| RVEDV index (ml/m2) | 82.9 ± 14.8 | 80.2 ± 15.8 | 84.6 ± 14.9 | 80.0 ± 15.2 | 85.9 ± 16.9 |
| RVESV index (ml/m2) | 36.2 ± 9.2 | 35.2 ± 9.5 | 37.4 ± 9.0 | 35.0 ± 9.0 | 38.5 ± 11.2 |
| RVSV index (ml/m2) | 46.6± 8.9 | 44.9 ± 9.7 | 47.2 ± 9.3 | 44.9 ± 9.9 | 47.4 ± 8.5 |
| LVEF (%) | 57.7 ± 7.6 | 58.7 ± 6.3 | 55.3 ± 8.4 | 58.5 ± 6.3 | 59.1 ± 5.7 |
| RVEF (%) | 56.5 ± 6.5 | 56.2 ± 6.9 | 55.9 ± 6.6 | 56.2 ± 7.1 | 55.7 ± 6.2 |
IHD, Ischaemic heart disease; MI, Myocardial infarction; IS, Ischaemic stroke; LVEDV, left ventricle end-diastolic volume; LVESV, left ventricle end-systolic volume; LVSV, left ventricle stroke volume; LVM, left ventricle mass; RVEDV, right ventricle end-diastolic volume; RVESV, right ventricle end-systolic volume; RVSV, right ventricle stroke volume; LVEF, left ventricle ejection fraction; RVEF, right ventricle ejection fraction. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations for continuous variable and count (%) for categorical variables.
p < 0.001 when compared with healthy controls.
p < 0.001 when compared with cerebrovascular disease and IS.
Figure 2Receiver operating curves for radiomics vs. conventional CMR indices models in IHD and Cerebrovascular Disease groups. IHD, ischaemic heart disease; AUC, Area under the curve.
Figure 3Receiver operating curves for radiomics vs. conventional CMR indices models in MI and IS groups. MI, myocardial infarction; IS, ischaemic stroke; AUC, Area under the curve.
Comparing the degree of discrimination achieved using radiomics only, conventional CMR indices and both (combined model) for each disease group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| SVM | 0.82 (0.03) | 0.75 (0.04) | 0.83 (0.03) | <0.05 |
| Random Forest | 0.80 (0.04) | 0.69 (0.05) | 0.82 (0.04) | <0.05 |
|
| ||||
| SVM | 0.79 (0.05) | 0.77 (0.06) | 0.81 (0.05) | <0.05 |
| Random Forest | 0.76 (0.05) | 0.69 (0.07) | 0.79 (0.02) | <0.05 |
|
| ||||
| SVM | 0.87 (0.02) | 0.79 (0.05) | 0.86 (0.02) | <0.05 |
| Random Forest | 0.83 (0.04) | 0.77 (0.03) | 0.83 (0.02) | <0.05 |
|
| ||||
| SVM | 0.81 (0.10) | 0.72 (0.11) | 0.81 (0.10) | 0.08 |
| Random Forest | 0.77 (0.08) | 0.67 (0.07) | 0.78 (0.09) | <0.05 |
The model performance is presented as mean AUC (STD). The paired t-test statistical significance is used to compare combined model vs. conventional CMR indices.
IHD, Ischaemic heart disease; MI, myocardial infarction; IS, ischaemic stroke; SVM, Support Vector Machines; RF, Random Forests; AUC, Area under the curve; STD, Standard deviation.
Figure 4Percentage of radiomic features extracted from each region of interest (ROI) in each disease group. IHD, ischaemic heart disease; MI, myocardial infarction; IS, ischaemic stroke; LV, left ventricle; MYO, myocardium; RV, right ventricle.
Figure 5The overall contribution of first-order, shape, and texture features to a signature in IHD, cerebrovascular disease, MI and IS groups, based on the mean weight value per each feature type. IHD, ischaemic heart disease; MI, myocardial infarction; IS, ischaemic stroke.
Selected top-ranked most discriminative shape features for IHD and MI compared to healthy controls.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Max 2D diameter slice (MYO) (ED) | 75.767 ± 9.479 | 77.216 ± 8.121 | 72.632 ± 6.522 |
| Max 2D diameter column (MYO) (ES) | 87.168 ± 8.470 | 89.267 ± 8.776 | 83.676 ± 7.843 |
| Surface area to volume ratio (MYO) (ED) | 0.420 ± 0.055 | 0.413 ± 0.052 | 0.463 ± 0.059 |
| Max 2D diameter column (MYO) (ED) | 102.662 ± 8.627 | 104.478 ± 8.520 | 99.523 ± 8.307 |
| Max 2D diameter slice (MYO) (ES) | 66.201 ± 9.275 | 67.968 ± 8.713 | 62.503 ± 8.340 |
| Max 2D diameter row (MYO) (ES) | 86.460 ± 8.939 | 88.389 ± 8.990 | 83.389 ± 9.092 |
| Volume (MYO) (ED) | 91282 ± 22146 | 96595 ± 22534 | 78768 ± 20704 |
| Least axis (MYO) (ES) | 61.171 ± 6.379 | 63.351 ± 6.717 | 59.085 ± 5.528 |
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. IHD, ischaemic heart disease; MI, myocardial infarction; MYO, myocardial; ED, end-diastole; ES, end-systole. All differences are statistically significant when compared with healthy controls (Bonferroni adjusted p < 0.05).
Selected top-ranked most discriminative shape, first-order and texture features for cerebrovascular disease and ischaemic stroke (IS) compared to healthy controls.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Skewness LV ED (F) | −0.619 ± 0.170 | −0.742 ± 0.162 |
| Sphericity MYO ED (S) | 0.265 ± 0.021 | 0.253 ± 0.017 |
| Kurtosis LV ED (F) | 2.390 ± 0.289 | 2.610 ± 0.303 |
| Run length non-uniformity | 1,010.998 ± 214.912 | 957.296 ± 179.239 |
| MYO ED (T) | ||
|
| ||
| Skewness LV ED (F) | −0.593 ± 0.165 | −0.742 ± 0.162 |
| Sphericity MYO ED (S) | 0.266 ± 0.020 | 0.253 ± 0.017 |
| Kurtosis LV ED (F) | 2.355 ± 0.304 | 2.610 ± 0.303 |
| Grey level non-uniformity LV ES (T) | 21.665 ± 6.258 | 22.472 ± 5.574 |
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. S, shape radiomics; F, first-order radiomics; T, texture radiomics; LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle; MYO, myocardial; ED, end-diastole; ES, end-systole.
Significant difference when compared with healthy controls (Bonferroni adjusted p < 0.05).
Selected radiomic features for each disease group compared to healthy controls.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skewness LV (ED) (F) | −0.638 ± 0.173 | −0.649 ± 0.173 | −0.619 ± 0.170 | −0.593 ± 0.165 | −0.742 ± 0.162 |
| Kurtosis LV (ED) (F) | 2.435 ± 0.308 | 2.452 ± 0.320 | 2.390 ± 0.289 | 2.355 ± 0.304 | 2.610 ± 0.303 |
| Sphericity MYO (ED) (S) | 0.265 ± 0.021 | 0.264 ± 0.021 | 0.265 ± 0.021 | 0.266 ± 0.020 | 0.253 ± 0.017 |
| Surface Area to volume ratio MYO (ES) (S) | 0.279 ± 0.038 | 0.281 ± 0.039 | 0.279 ± 0.043 | 0.279 ± 0.037 | 0.298 ± 0.035 |
| Surface Area to volume ratio MYO (ED) (S) | 0.420 ± 0.055 | 0.413 ± 0.052 | 0.425 ± 0.059 | 0.422 ± 0.053 | 0.463 ± 0.059 |
| Least axis MYO (ES) (S) | 61.171 ± 6.379 | 63.351 ± 6.717 | 60.041 ± 5.676 | 59.905 ± 5.544 | 59.085 ± 5.528 |
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. IHD, ischaemic heart disease; MI, myocardial infarction; IS, ischaemic stroke; S, shape radiomics; F, first-order radiomics; LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle; MYO, myocardial; ED, end-diastole; ES, end-systole.
Significant difference when compared with healthy controls (Bonferroni adjusted p < 0.05).
Significant difference when compared with the other disease groups (Bonferroni adjusted p < 0.05).