| Literature DB >> 34631566 |
Harsh N Dongre1,2,3, Hilde Haave4,5, Siren Fromreide2,3, Fredrik A Erland4,5, Svein Erik Emblem Moe4,5, Sophia Manueldas Dhayalan1, Rasmus Kopperud Riis1, Dipak Sapkota6, Daniela Elena Costea1,2,3, Hans Jorgen Aarstad4,5, Olav K Vintermyr1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly applied in clinical oncology to advance personalized treatment. Despite success in many other tumour types, use of targeted NGS panels for assisting diagnosis and treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) is still limited. AIM: The focus of this study was to establish a robust NGS panel targeting most frequent cancer mutations in long-term preserved formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples of HNSCC from routine diagnostics.Entities:
Keywords: actionable mutation; head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC); inflammation; next-generation sequencing (NGS); pathological parameters; stromal desmoplasia
Year: 2021 PMID: 34631566 PMCID: PMC8497964 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.734134
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Clinical parameters of patients.
| Characteristics | All patients n = 104 (%) | HPV-positive n = 43 (%) | HPV-negative n = 57 (%) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis | 63 | 59 | 64 | 0.381 |
| Median | (38-87) | (38-87) | (39-84) | |
| Sex: | 0.230 | |||
| Male | 82 (78.8) | 36 (83.7) | 42 (73.7) | |
| Female | 22 (21.2) | 07 (16.3) | 15 (26.3) | |
| Tumour site: |
| |||
| Oral cavity | 33 (31.7) | 01 (2.3) | 32 (56.1) | |
| Oropharynx | 63 (60.6) | 41 (95.4) | 22 (38.7) | |
| Hypopharynx | 03 (2.9) | 01 (2.3) | 01 (1.7)$ | |
| Larynx | 02 (1.9) | 00 | 02 (3.5) | |
| Metastasis | 03 (2.9) | – | – | |
| Smoking: | 0.137 | |||
| Yes | 71 (68.3) | 25 (58.1) | 42 (73.7) | |
| No | 33 (31.7) | 18 (41.9) | 15 (26.3) | |
| T stage: | 0.289 | |||
| T1 and T2 | 64 (61.5) | 25 (58.1) | 39 (68.4) | |
| T3 and T4 | 37 (35.6) | 18 (41.9) | 19 (31.6) | |
| Unknown | 03 (2.9) | – | – | |
| N stage: |
| |||
| N0 | 44 (42.3) | 9 (20.9) | 35 (61.4) | |
| N+ | 57 (54.8) | 34 (79.1) | 23 (38.6) | |
| Unknown | 03 (2.9) | – | – | |
| M stage: | 0.127 | |||
| M0 | 98 (94.2) | 43 (100) | 55 (94.7) | |
| M+ | 03 (2.9) | 0 | 03 (5.3) | |
| Unknown | 03 (2.9) | – | – | |
| Stage grouping# | – | |||
| Stage I | 12 (11.5) | 01 (2.3) | 10 (17.5) | |
| Stage II | 19 (18.3) | 03 (6.9) | 16 (28.1) | |
| Stage III | 11 (10.6) | 05 (11.7) | 06 (10.6) | |
| Stage IV | 59 (56.7) | 34 (79.1) | 25 (43.8) | |
| Unknown | 03 (2.9) |
p-value is based on Chi-square test.
*Correlation between oral cavity and oropharynx based on HPV status. #Based on AJCC 6th edition. $HPV DNA test was inconclusive for one patient. Significant values are denoted in bold.
Figure 1Clinico-pathological correlations depicting an extensive (scores 3&4) stromal reaction, an aggressive (scores 3&4) invasive front and a poor (scores 3&4) inflammatory infiltrate in HPV-negative HNSCC as compared to the HPV-positive cases (A), and associations between extensive stromal reaction and bigger size tumours, an aggressive invasive front, and a poor inflammatory infiltrate (B).
Figure 2(A) Mutational burden and (B) mutational spectrum of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas as detected by targeted sequencing. Samples were stratified according to HPV status followed by smoking status. Gene list is shown on the left whereas the corresponding frequency of mutation is shown on the right. Pos- positive; Neg- negative.
Figure 3Mutational signature in the HNSCC samples stratified with respect to HPV status for (A) variant classification and (B) variant type. (C) Comparison of number of patients with two or more mutations in the same gene. Mutational profile based on C:G>T:A transitions in (D) HPV-negative and (E) HPV-positive samples.
Figure 4Mutational signature associated with smokers and non-smokers based on (A) variant classification, and (B) variant type. (C) Comparison of number of patients with two or more mutations in the same gene based on smoking status. Mutational profile based on C:G>T:A transitions in (D) smokers and (E) non-smokers.
Figure 5Pictorial representation of single nucleotide variant distribution on domain structure of FGFR3, FAT1 and NSD1.
Figure 6Correlations of mutational landscape with histopathological parameters. (A) Bar graph showing distribution of cases with at least one mutation and without mutations in the genes targeted by the NGS panel according to histopathological parameters. (B) Histological picture of a tumour with at least one mutation detected by targeted NGS panel, and an extensive stromal desmoplastic response (solid arrows), an aggressive invasive tumour front (solid arrowheads), a less differentiated phenotype and a poor inflammatory response. (C) Histological representation of a tumour with no mutations detected by targeted NGS panel and a little stromal desmoplastic response, non-aggressive invasive tumour front (solid arrowheads), a more differentiated phenotype and an intense inflammatory response (solid arrows). Scale bar = 100 μm.
Figure 7Kaplan-Meier curves showing significant associations between the mutational score based on seven cancer-specific genes found most frequently mutated in HNSCC and further stratified based on HPV-status using the targeted NGS panel and disease-free survival (5 years) and overall survival (5 years).