Literature DB >> 34631412

Smart sensor implant technology in total knee arthroplasty.

Karthikeyan P Iyengar1, Benjamin Thomas Vincent Gowers2, Vijay Kumar Jain3, Raju S Ahluwalia4, Rajesh Botchu5, Raju Vaishya6.   

Abstract

Innovations in computer technology and implant design have paved the way for the development of smart instruments and intelligent implants in trauma and orthopaedics to improve patient-related functional outcomes. Sensor technology uses embedded devices that detect physical, chemical and biological signals and provide a way for these signals to be measured and recorded. Sensor technology applications have been introduced in various fields of medicine in the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of diseases. Intelligent 'Smart' implants are devices that can provide diagnostic capabilities along with therapeutic benefits. In trauma and orthopaedics, applications of sensors is increasing because of the advances in microchip technologies for implant devices and research designs. It offers real-time monitoring from the signals transmitted by the embedded sensors and thus provides early management solutions. Smart orthopaedic implants have applications in total knee arthroplasty, hip arthroplasty, spine surgery, fracture healing, early detection of infection and implant loosening. Here we have explored the role of Smart sensor implant technology in total knee arthroplasty. Smart sensor assisted can be used intraoperatively to provide objective assessment of ligament and soft tissue balancing whilst maintaining the sagittal and coronal alignment to achieve desired kinematic targets following total knee arthroplasty. It can also provide post-implantation data to monitor implant performance in natural conditions and patient's clinical recovery during rehabilitation. The use of Smart Sensor implant technology in total knee arthroplasty appears to provide superior patient satisfaction rates and improved functional outcomes.
© 2021 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Orthopaedic surgery; Orthopaedics; Sensor; Smart implant; Total knee arthroplasty

Year:  2021        PMID: 34631412      PMCID: PMC8479248          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  28 in total

1.  Sensors 2010.

Authors:  C B Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-13

Review 2.  Implantable sensor technology: from research to clinical practice.

Authors:  Eric H Ledet; Darryl D'Lima; Peter Westerhoff; John A Szivek; Rebecca A Wachs; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Patient expectations of arthroplasty of the hip and knee.

Authors:  C E H Scott; K E Bugler; N D Clement; D MacDonald; C R Howie; L C Biant
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-07

Review 4.  Electrochemical glucose sensors in diabetes management: an updated review (2010-2020).

Authors:  Hazhir Teymourian; Abbas Barfidokht; Joseph Wang
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 54.564

5.  Smart orthopaedic implants: A targeted approach for continuous postoperative evaluation in the spine.

Authors:  Vivek A S Ramakrishna; Uphar Chamoli; Ginu Rajan; Subhas C Mukhopadhyay; B Gangadhara Prusty; Ashish D Diwan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Increased satisfaction after total knee replacement using sensor-guided technology.

Authors:  K A Gustke; G J Golladay; M W Roche; G J Jerry; L C Elson; C R Anderson
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 7.  Why knee replacements fail in 2013: patient, surgeon, or implant?

Authors:  A V Lombardi; K R Berend; J B Adams
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Implantable strain sensor to monitor fracture healing with standard radiography.

Authors:  Hunter Pelham; Donald Benza; Paul W Millhouse; Nathan Carrington; Md Arifuzzaman; Caleb J Behrend; Jeffrey N Anker; John D DesJardins
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Smart implants in orthopedic surgery, improving patient outcomes: a review.

Authors:  Eric H Ledet; Benjamin Liddle; Katerina Kradinova; Sara Harper
Journal:  Innov Entrep Health       Date:  2018-08-29

Review 10.  Recent Trends, Technical Concepts and Components of Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Systems: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Jan Kubicek; Filip Tomanec; Martin Cerny; Dominik Vilimek; Martina Kalova; David Oczka
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.576

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Restricted kinematic alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review of radiographic and clinical data.

Authors:  Salvatore Risitano; Giorgio Cacciola; Luigi Sabatini; Marcello Capella; Francesco Bosco; Fortunato Giustra; Alessandro Massè; Raju Vaishya
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-07-02

2.  Industry 5.0 technology capabilities in Trauma and Orthopaedics.

Authors:  Karthikeyan P Iyengar; Eindere Zaw Pe; Janaranjan Jalli; Madapura K Shashidhara; Vijay K Jain; Abhishek Vaish; Raju Vaishya
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-06-06

3.  Will technology drive orthopaedic surgery in the future?

Authors:  Raju Vaishya; Marius M Scarlat; Karthikeyan P Iyengar
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 4.  Bioelectronic multifunctional bone implants: recent trends.

Authors:  Marco P Soares Dos Santos; Rodrigo M C Bernardo
Journal:  Bioelectron Med       Date:  2022-09-21

5.  Sensors and digital medicine in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Géraldine Merle; Alexandre Parent-Harvey; Edward J Harvey
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2022-04-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.