Literature DB >> 34631298

Interventions for Distal Radius Fractures: A Meta-analysis of Comparison Studies.

Julia Beyer1, Emily Wynkoop1, Jiayong Liu1, Nabil A Ebraheim1.   

Abstract

Background  Distal radius fractures are one of the most frequent orthopaedic injuries. There are many effective treatment methods, such as volar plate, dorsal plate, percutaneous pins, external fixation, and casting; however, comparison of the treatment outcomes has not been thoroughly investigated. Our purpose is to determine if volar plating is the superior treatment method for distal radius fractures. We will address this through the following questions: First, is volar plating superior to dorsal plating, percutaneous pins, external fixation, or casting in terms of reported complications? Second, does volar plating produce superior functional outcomes to dorsal plating, percutaneous pins, external fixation, or casting? Third, are the radiographic outcomes superior for volar plating when compared with dorsal plating, percutaneous pins, external fixation, or casting? Methods  MEDLINE, Academic Search Ultimate, Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Plus, and JSTOR databases, as well as manual search, were used to identify papers comparing complications and functional results of volar plating to other treatment methods for distal radius fractures published after the year 2000. Complication data and function scores were recorded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and data was analyzed for meta-analysis using Cochrane ReviewManager software. Results  Compared with dorsal plate, volar plate performed significantly better in Gartland and Werley score. Volar plating outperformed percutaneous pins for loss of reduction, infection, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and ulnar deviation. Loss of reduction, malunion, Patient Related Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score, DASH score, grip strength, ulnar deviation, and supination were significantly better for volar plating when compared with casting. When compared with external fixation, volar plating had significantly less cases of infection, lower QuickDASH score, and higher range of motion for flexion, pronation, and supination. All other complication and functional outcomes were not significantly different. Conclusions  Distal radius fractures treated with volar plating showed relatively better measures of complications, function scores, and range of motion than other treatment methods; however, there was no significant difference in healing time when compared with percutaneous pins. More studies are needed to compare the rest of the treatment methods with each other. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  casting; distal radial fracture; external fixation; percutaneous pins; volar or dorsal plate

Year:  2021        PMID: 34631298      PMCID: PMC8489996          DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1723793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wrist Surg        ISSN: 2163-3916


  39 in total

1.  Volar Locking Plates Versus Augmented External Fixation of Intra-Articular Distal Radial Fractures: Functional Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ola-Lars Hammer; Ståle Clementsen; Joakim Hast; Jūratė Šaltytė Benth; Jan Erik Madsen; Per-Henrik Randsborg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  External Fixation Versus Volar Locking Plate for Unstable Dorsally Displaced Distal Radius Fractures-A 3-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Jenny Saving; Anders Enocson; Sari Ponzer; Cecilia Mellstrand Navarro
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.230

3.  Volar Plate Fixation Versus Plaster Immobilization in Acceptably Reduced Extra-Articular Distal Radial Fractures: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Marjolein A M Mulders; Monique M J Walenkamp; Susan van Dieren; J Carel Goslings; Niels W L Schep
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Volar locking plate versus K-wire-supported external fixation in the treatment of AO/ASIF type C distal radius fractures: A comparison of functional and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Altuğ Duramaz; Mustafa Gökhan Bilgili; Evren Karaali; Berhan Bayram; Nezih Ziroğlu; Cemal Kural
Journal:  Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2018-05

5.  Dorsal and volar 2.4-mm titanium locking plate fixation for AO type C3 dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures.

Authors:  Ying-Chao Chou; Alvin Chao-Yu Chen; Chun-Ying Chen; Yung-Heng Hsu; Chi-Chuan Wu
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  The treatment of displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Christoph Bartl; Dirk Stengel; Thomas Bruckner; Florian Gebhard
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Non-bridging external fixation employing multiplanar K-wires versus volar locked plating for dorsally displaced fractures of the distal radius.

Authors:  Georg Gradl; Gertraud Gradl; Martina Wendt; Thomas Mittlmeier; Guenther Kundt; Jesse B Jupiter
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Comparison between cast immobilization versus volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures in active elderly patients, the Asian perspective.

Authors:  Ying-Ho Chan; Tun-Lin Foo; Chong-Jin Yeo; Winston Yoon-Chong Chew
Journal:  Hand Surg       Date:  2014

9.  Outcomes and financial implications of intra-articular distal radius fractures: a comparative study of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with volar locking plates versus nonoperative management.

Authors:  Dong Hao Toon; Rex Antony Xavier Premchand; Jane Sim; Rajaratnam Vaikunthan
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-02-02

10.  Comparison of radiographic and functional results of die-punch fracture of distal radius between volar locking plating (VLP) and external fixation (EF).

Authors:  Yanqing Zhou; Yanbin Zhu; Xiong Zhang; Dehu Tian; Bing Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.