| Literature DB >> 34630613 |
Zhou Feng1, Xiaoying Hu1, Weiying Qu1, Xiaoqin Zhu1, Jiaying Lu1, Zhongdi Huang1, Lin Zhao1, Pei Chen1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical efficacy and mechanism of compound Shenlu granule (SLG) treatment in patients with aplastic anemia (AA).Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34630613 PMCID: PMC8497100 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6655848
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Comparison of clinical efficacy of two groups (n (%)).
| Basically cured | Remission | Improved | Invalid | Disease control rate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A ( | 3 (7.69) | 19 (48.72) | 9 (23.08) | 8 (20.51) | 79.49 |
| Group B ( | 3 (7.32) | 7 (17.07) | 18 (43.90) | 13 (31.71) | 68.29 |
P=0.007; χ2 = 7.36.
Comparison of hemograms between two groups.
| Time | WBC (109/L) | RBC | Hb (g/L) | PLT (109/L) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Baseline | 3.31 (0.25) | 2.49 (0.13) | 87.90 (4.16) | 31.61 (4.83) |
| After treatment | 4.32 (0.21) | 3.01 (0.14) | 109.30 (4.63) | 49.13 (7.05) | |
|
| 3.20 | 2.73 | 3.48 | 2.09 | |
|
| 0.002 | 0.008 | 0.001 | 0.041 | |
| Group B | Baseline | 3.40 (0.19) | 2.31 (0.09) | 81.20 (3.89) | 34.33 (4.43) |
| After treatment | 3.89 (0.28) | 2.81 (0.10) | 96.76 (3.58) | 44.13 (5.26) | |
|
| 1.446 | 3.71 | 2.95 | 1.423 | |
|
| 0.153 | <0.000 | 0.004 | 0.159 |
WBC, white blood cell; RBC, red blood cell; Hb, hemoglobin; PLT, platelet. P < 0.05; P < 0.01.
Figure 1TCM syndrome scores of the two groups evaluated before and after treatment (P < 0.05; P < 0.01).
Figure 2Representative chromatogram of plasma samples of the SLG group derived from UPLC-Q-Exactive. (a) ESI positive mode and (b) ESI negative mode.
Figure 3OPLS-DA scores and model parameters before and after treatment in group B. (a) Score scatter plot and (b) the model parameters (R2X = 0.22, R2Y = 0.87, and Q2 = 0.49).
Identification results of potential biomarkers after SLG intervention.
| Name | HMDB | Formula | Trend | VIP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tryptophan | HMDB00929 | C11H12N2O2 | Up | 1.21 |
| Glutamate | HMDB00161 | C5H9NO4 | Up | 1.39 |
| Serine | HMDB00187 | C3H7NO3 | Up | 1.15 |
| Methionine | HMDB00696 | C5H11NO2S | Up | 1.42 |
| Ornithine | HMDB0000214 | C5H12N2O2 | Up | 2.03 |
| PA 16:0 | HMDB00674 | C39H73O8P | Up | 2.13 |
| PC 22:5 | HMDB08680 | C48H84NO8P | Up | 1.70 |
| PC 14:0 | HMDB07867 | C37H69O8P | Up | 1.61 |
| Propionylcarnitine | HMDB00824 | C10H20ClNO4 | Up | 2.85 |
| Palmitic acid | HMDB00220 | C19H38O4 | Up | 2.17 |
| Acetylspermidine | HMDB01276 | C9H21N3O | Down | 1.06 |
| Sphingosine | HMDB00252 | C18H37NO2 | Down | 1.47 |
| 5-HETE | HMDB11134 | C20H32O3 | Down | 1.08 |
| Azelaic acid | HMDB00784 | C9H16O4 | Down | 1.35 |
Figure 4The main metabolic pathways based on potential biomarkers.