Yuanhang Liu1, Massimo Raimondo2, Michael B Wallace2, Kabir Mody3, John A Stauffer4, Lizhi Zhang5, Baoan Ji6, Yan Bi2. 1. From the Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 2. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 3. Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology. 4. Division of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL. 5. Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 6. Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (ACC) is a rare pancreatic cancer. The advancement of treatment is hampered because of the limited knowledge of its molecular mechanism. METHODS: Whole-exome sequencing was performed on DNA extracted from 11 pure ACC surgical samples. Potential germline variants were removed on the basis of polymorphic databases, alternative allele frequency, coverage depth, and Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) annotations after variant calling procedure. Mutation profiles and signatures were assessed through the Mutational Patterns package. RESULTS: A median of 34 somatic mutations were detected (range, 19-60). Three novel recurrent small deletions were identified. Common pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma mutations or neuroendocrine tumor mutants were not found. FAT atypical cadherin 4, mucin 5B, titin, and zinc finger homeobox 3 were consistently mutated across 4 independent ACC studies. A high contribution of COSMIC mutational signature 1 was seen in ACC, indicating deamination of 5-methylcytosine. The majority of the patients had COSMIC signatures 6, 15, or 20, relating to defective DNA mismatch repair. Six patients showed COSMIC mutational signature 10 because of the altered activity of DNA polymerase epsilon. CONCLUSIONS: Distinct mutational signatures pathways were found in ACC and targeting them may improve clinical outcome.
OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (ACC) is a rare pancreatic cancer. The advancement of treatment is hampered because of the limited knowledge of its molecular mechanism. METHODS: Whole-exome sequencing was performed on DNA extracted from 11 pure ACC surgical samples. Potential germline variants were removed on the basis of polymorphic databases, alternative allele frequency, coverage depth, and Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) annotations after variant calling procedure. Mutation profiles and signatures were assessed through the Mutational Patterns package. RESULTS: A median of 34 somatic mutations were detected (range, 19-60). Three novel recurrent small deletions were identified. Common pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma mutations or neuroendocrine tumor mutants were not found. FAT atypical cadherin 4, mucin 5B, titin, and zinc finger homeobox 3 were consistently mutated across 4 independent ACC studies. A high contribution of COSMIC mutational signature 1 was seen in ACC, indicating deamination of 5-methylcytosine. The majority of the patients had COSMIC signatures 6, 15, or 20, relating to defective DNA mismatch repair. Six patients showed COSMIC mutational signature 10 because of the altered activity of DNA polymerase epsilon. CONCLUSIONS: Distinct mutational signatures pathways were found in ACC and targeting them may improve clinical outcome.
Authors: Srdan Verstovsek; Ruben A Mesa; Jason Gotlib; Richard S Levy; Vikas Gupta; John F DiPersio; John V Catalano; Michael Deininger; Carole Miller; Richard T Silver; Moshe Talpaz; Elliott F Winton; Jimmie H Harvey; Murat O Arcasoy; Elizabeth Hexner; Roger M Lyons; Ronald Paquette; Azra Raza; Kris Vaddi; Susan Erickson-Viitanen; Iphigenia L Koumenis; William Sun; Victor Sandor; Hagop M Kantarjian Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Roeland F de Wilde; Niki A Ottenhof; Marnix Jansen; Folkert H M Morsink; Wendy W J de Leng; G Johan A Offerhaus; Lodewijk A A Brosens Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2011-05-13 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Frank Bergmann; Sebastian Aulmann; Bence Sipos; Matthias Kloor; Anja von Heydebreck; Johannes Schweipert; Andreas Harjung; Philipp Mayer; Werner Hartwig; Gerhard Moldenhauer; David Capper; Gerhard Dyckhoff; Kolja Freier; Esther Herpel; Anja Schleider; Peter Schirmacher; Gunhild Mechtersheimer; Günter Klöppel; Hendrik Bläker Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: G Rigaud; P S Moore; G Zamboni; S Orlandini; D Taruscio; S Paradisi; N R Lemoine; G Klöppel; A Scarpa Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2000-12-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Yuchen Jiao; Raluca Yonescu; G Johan A Offerhaus; David S Klimstra; Anirban Maitra; James R Eshleman; James G Herman; Weijie Poh; Lorraine Pelosof; Christopher L Wolfgang; Bert Vogelstein; Kenneth W Kinzler; Ralph H Hruban; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Laura D Wood Journal: J Pathol Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Catherine S Grasso; Yi-Mi Wu; Dan R Robinson; Xuhong Cao; Saravana M Dhanasekaran; Amjad P Khan; Michael J Quist; Xiaojun Jing; Robert J Lonigro; J Chad Brenner; Irfan A Asangani; Bushra Ateeq; Sang Y Chun; Javed Siddiqui; Lee Sam; Matt Anstett; Rohit Mehra; John R Prensner; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Gregory A Ryslik; Fabio Vandin; Benjamin J Raphael; Lakshmi P Kunju; Daniel R Rhodes; Kenneth J Pienta; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Scott A Tomlins Journal: Nature Date: 2012-07-12 Impact factor: 49.962