Iraklis E Tseregounis1, Daniel J Tancredi1,2, Susan L Stewart3, Aaron B Shev4, Andrew Crawford4, James J Gasper5, Garen Wintemute4, Brandon D L Marshall6, Magdalena Cerdá7, Stephen G Henry1,8. 1. Center for Healthcare Policy and Research. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, Sacramento. 3. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis. 4. Violence Prevention Research Program, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento. 5. Department of Family and Community Medicine, National Clinician Consultation Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. 6. Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI. 7. Department of Population Health, Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY. 8. Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tools are needed to aid clinicians in estimating their patients' risk of transitioning to long-term opioid use and to inform prescribing decisions. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop and validate a model that predicts previously opioid-naive patients' risk of transitioning to long-term use. RESEARCH DESIGN: This was a statewide population-based prognostic study. SUBJECTS: Opioid-naive (no prescriptions in previous 2 y) patients aged 12 years old and above who received a pill-form opioid analgesic in 2016-2018 and whose prescriptions were registered in the California Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP). MEASURES: A multiple logistic regression approach was used to construct a prediction model with long-term (ie, >90 d) opioid use as the outcome. Models were developed using 2016-2017 data and validated using 2018 data. Discrimination (c-statistic), calibration (calibration slope, intercept, and visual inspection of calibration plots), and clinical utility (decision curve analysis) were evaluated to assess performance. RESULTS: Development and validation cohorts included 7,175,885 and 2,788,837 opioid-naive patients with outcome rates of 5.0% and 4.7%, respectively. The model showed high discrimination (c-statistic: 0.904 for development, 0.913 for validation), was well-calibrated after intercept adjustment (intercept, -0.006; 95% confidence interval, -0.016 to 0.004; slope, 1.049; 95% confidence interval, 1.045-1.053), and had a net benefit over a wide range of probability thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: A model for the transition from opioid-naive status to long-term use had high discrimination and was well-calibrated. Given its high predictive performance, this model shows promise for future integration into PDMPs to aid clinicians in formulating opioid prescribing decisions at the point of care.
BACKGROUND: Tools are needed to aid clinicians in estimating their patients' risk of transitioning to long-term opioid use and to inform prescribing decisions. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop and validate a model that predicts previously opioid-naive patients' risk of transitioning to long-term use. RESEARCH DESIGN: This was a statewide population-based prognostic study. SUBJECTS: Opioid-naive (no prescriptions in previous 2 y) patients aged 12 years old and above who received a pill-form opioid analgesic in 2016-2018 and whose prescriptions were registered in the California Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP). MEASURES: A multiple logistic regression approach was used to construct a prediction model with long-term (ie, >90 d) opioid use as the outcome. Models were developed using 2016-2017 data and validated using 2018 data. Discrimination (c-statistic), calibration (calibration slope, intercept, and visual inspection of calibration plots), and clinical utility (decision curve analysis) were evaluated to assess performance. RESULTS: Development and validation cohorts included 7,175,885 and 2,788,837 opioid-naive patients with outcome rates of 5.0% and 4.7%, respectively. The model showed high discrimination (c-statistic: 0.904 for development, 0.913 for validation), was well-calibrated after intercept adjustment (intercept, -0.006; 95% confidence interval, -0.016 to 0.004; slope, 1.049; 95% confidence interval, 1.045-1.053), and had a net benefit over a wide range of probability thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: A model for the transition from opioid-naive status to long-term use had high discrimination and was well-calibrated. Given its high predictive performance, this model shows promise for future integration into PDMPs to aid clinicians in formulating opioid prescribing decisions at the point of care.
Authors: Richard A Deyo; Sara E Hallvik; Christi Hildebran; Miguel Marino; Eve Dexter; Jessica M Irvine; Nicole O'Kane; Joshua Van Otterloo; Dagan A Wright; Gillian Leichtling; Lisa M Millet Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Stephen F Butler; Kathrine Fernandez; Christine Benoit; Simon H Budman; Robert N Jamison Journal: J Pain Date: 2008-01-22 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Stephen F Butler; Simon H Budman; Kathrine C Fernandez; Brian Houle; Christine Benoit; Nathaniel Katz; Robert N Jamison Journal: Pain Date: 2007-05-09 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Aditya V Karhade; Thomas D Cha; Harold A Fogel; Stuart H Hershman; Daniel G Tobert; Andrew J Schoenfeld; Christopher M Bono; Joseph H Schwab Journal: Spine J Date: 2019-12-31 Impact factor: 4.166