| Literature DB >> 34629080 |
Huan Zhao1, Xi Li1, Junhua Wang1, Wen Wang2, Chunyan Yang2, Jingjuan Li2, Xiuling Li2, Rui Pu2, Lulu Chen1, Xiao Zhang1, Jun Zhang1, Peng Luo3,4,5, Jiangping Zhang6.
Abstract
Men who have sex with men (MSM) are potentially at high risk for HIV infection, their HIV prevalence far exceeds the national prevalence rate. There are also a number of MSM who have sex with women, mostly unprotected, which can transmit HIV to their female sexual partners and even to the next generation. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the prevalence of heterosexual behaviors in Chinese men who have sex with men and the status of condom utilization as well as HIV infection among MSM with heterosexual behaviors, so as to further improve the investigation and prevention and control of AIDS in MSM population. We systematically searched China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Calligraphy (VIP), Pubmed, and Embase following certain retrieval strategies to find relevant articles published from January 1, 2015 to November 18, 2019, The useful information extracted from qualified articles, Stata 15.1 and Review Manager 5.3 were employed for further meta analysis. The estimated prevalence of heterosexual behaviors among MSM in the past year was 19.0% (95% CI 17.0%, 22.0%). The estimated condom utilization rate of the last heterosexual behavior among MSM and condom adherence rate of heterosexual behaviors among MSM were 51.0% (95% CI 44.0%, 58.0%) and 31.0% (95% CI 25.0%, 38.0%), respectively. And the pooled HIV prevalence in MSM with heterosexual behaviors was 9% (95% CI 6%, 13%). The sensitivity analysis showed that the results were stable. No publication bias was found by Egger's test. There is a high proportion of MSM with heterosexual behaviors and low condom utilization in China. HIV prevalence in MSM with heterosexual behaviors is also high. Therefore, adequate attention should be given to this particular group and measures should be taken in order to reduce the risk of transmission of HIV from subpopulations to the general population.Entities:
Keywords: Condom use; HIV prevalence; Heterosexual behavior; Men who have sex with men; Meta-analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34629080 PMCID: PMC8504059 DOI: 10.1186/s12981-021-00392-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS Res Ther ISSN: 1742-6405 Impact factor: 2.250
Fig. 1Flow chart of articles section for systematic review
The descriptive characteristics of included studies
| First author and Publication year | Study year | Study locations | Setting | Sampling method | Survey method | Recall windows(months) | Sample size | AHRQ score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhu, 2019-1[ | 2015 | Guangdong | VCT | Not reported | Face-to-face | 6 | 520 | 5 |
| Zhu, 2019-2 [ | 2016 | Guangdong | VCT | Not reported | Face-to-face | 6 | 516 | 5 |
| Zhu, 2019-3 [ | 2014 | Guangdong | VCT | Not reported | Face-to-face | 6 | 163 | 5 |
| Zhu, 2019-4 [ | 2015 | Guangdong | VCT | Not reported | Face-to-face | 6 | 357 | 5 |
| Zhu, 2019-5 [ | 2016 | Guangdong | VCT | Not reported | Face-to-face | 6 | 344 | 5 |
| Yu, 2019-1 [ | 2017 | Sichuan | Multiple recruitment methods | Not reported | Face-to-face | 6 | 410 | 5 |
| Yu, 2019−2 [ | 2017 | Sichuan | Multiple recruitment methods | Snowball sampling | Face-to-face | 6 | 460 | 5 |
| Wu, 2019 [ | Not reported | Guangdong | VCT | Snowball sampling + RDS | Face-to-face | 6 | 434 | 8 |
| Pan, 2019-1 [ | 2015 | Guizhou | Multiple recruitment methods | Not reported | Face-to-face | 6 | 248 | 5 |
| Pan, 2019-2 [ | 2016 | Guizhou | Multiple recruitment methods | Not reported | Face-to-face | 6 | 250 | 5 |
| Pan, 2019-3 [ | 2017 | Guizhou | Multiple recruitment methods | Not reported | Face-to-face | 6 | 252 | 5 |
| Pan, 2019-4 [ | 2018 | Guizhou | Multiple recruitment methods | Not reported | Face-to-face | 6 | 253 | 5 |
| Duan, 2019 [ | 2016 | Shandong | Multiple recruitment methods | Snowball sampling | Face-to-face | 6 | 1306 | 5 |
| Ding, 2019 [ | 2014 | Henan | MSM venues | Snowball sampling | Not reported | 6 | 205 | 5 |
| Zeng, 2019 [ | 2016 | Guangxi | Social organization | Convenience sampling | Face-to-face | 6 | 375 | 6 |
| Wu, 2019 [ | 2016–2017 | Hunan | Social organization | Not reported | Web based | 6 | 556 | 5 |
| Tang, 2018 [ | 2013 | Zhejiang | Multiple recruitment methods | Convenience sampling | Face-to-face | 3 | 238 | 5 |
| Sun, 2018 [ | 2015–2016 | Guangdong | Multiple recruitment methods | Snowball sampling | Self-administered | 6 | 334 | 6 |
| Hu, 2018 [ | 2017 | Chongqing | MSM venues | Not reported | Face-to-face | 12 | 300 | 6 |
| Guo, 2018 [ | 2013–2015 | Jiangsu | Multiple recruitment methods | Snowball sampling | Face-to-face | 6 | 1895 | 6 |
| Lin, 2017 [ | 2013–2015 | Zhejiang | MSM venues | Convenience sampling | Face-to-face | 6 | 1399 | 5 |
| Guo, 2017 [ | 2013–2015 | Jiangsu | Not reported | Snowball sampling | Face-to-face | 6 | 2377 | 6 |
| Wang, 2016 [ | Not reported | Yunnan | NGO | Snowball sampling + RDS | Face-to-face | 6 | 557 | 5 |
| Qiu, 2016 [ | 2012–2015 | Hubei | Not reported | Snowball sampling | Face-to-face | 6 | 1559 | 5 |
| Li 2016 [ | 2014–2016 | Guangdong | MSM venues | TLS + Snowball sampling | Not reported | 6 | 801 | 5 |
| Lei, 2016 [ | 2014 | Hunan | NGO | Snowball sampling RDS | Not reported | 6 | 604 | 6 |
| Gong, 2016 [ | 2011–2015 | Shandong | MSM venues | Not reported | Face-to-face | 6 | 1350 | 6 |
| Du, 2016 [ | Not reported | Jiangxi | Not reported | Not reported | Self-administered | 6 | 117 | 5 |
| Ding, 2016 [ | 2014–2015 | Zhejiang | Working group | Snowball sampling + RDS | Face-to-face | 3 | 351 | 5 |
| Zhao, 2015 [ | 2012–2014 | Liaoning | Not reported | Snowball sampling | Face-to-face | 6 | 1208 | 5 |
| Zhang, 2015 [ | 2009 | Yunnan | Not reported | Snowball sampling | Face-to-face | 6 | 453 | 6 |
| Zhang, 2015 [ | Not reported | Shanghai | Social organization | Snowball sampling | Face-to-face | 6 | 673 | 5 |
| Wang, 2015 [ | 2013 | Liaoning | Not reported | RDS | Face-to-face | 6 | 900 | 5 |
| Wang, 2015 [ | 2013–2014 | Shandong | Not reported | Not reported | Face-to-face | 6 | 408 | 5 |
| Tang, 2015 [ | Not reported | Zhejiang | Multiple recruitment methods | RDS | Not reported | 3 | 238 | 5 |
| Sun, 2015 [ | 2014 | Not reported | working group | non-probability sampling | Face-to-face | 6 | 524 | 5 |
| Ren, 2015 [ | 2008–2009 | Shaanxi | Not reported | Snowball sampling | Not reported | 6 | 1365 | 5 |
| Peng, 2015 [ | 2013–2014 | Guangdong | Not reported | Convenience sampling | Face-to-face | 6 | 369 | 6 |
| Long, 2015 [ | 2014 | Guangdong | Multiple recruitment methods | Snowball sampling | Face-to-face | 6 | 421 | 5 |
| Li, 2015 [ | Not reported | Heilongjiang | Multiple recruitment methods | Snowball sampling | Face-to-face | 6 | 400 | 5 |
| Gong, 2015-1 [ | 2010 | Shandong | Multiple recruitment methods | Snowball sampling | Face-to-face | 6 | 310 | 5 |
| Gong, 2015-2 [ | 2011 | Shandong | Multiple recruitment methods | Snowball sampling | Face-to-face | 6 | 350 | 5 |
| Gong, 2015-3 [ | 2012 | Shandong | Multiple recruitment methods | Snowball sampling | Face-to-face | 6 | 402 | 5 |
| Gong, 2015-4 [ | 2013 | Shandong | Multiple recruitment methods | Snowball sampling | Face-to-face | 6 | 364 | 5 |
| Gong, 2015-5 [ | 2014 | Shandong | Multiple recruitment methods | Snowball sampling | Face-to-face | 6 | 329 | 5 |
| Chen, 2018 [ | 2010–2017 | Zhejiang | Not reported | Non-probability sampling | Not reported | 6 | 334 | 5 |
Fig. 2Forest chart of the prevalence of heterosexual behaviors among MSM
Subgroup analysis of heterosexual behavior in MSM population
| Variables | Subgroups | The number of studies | The prevalence of heterogeneity behaviors among MSM and 95% CI | I2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study locations | Northeast China | 3 | 15.3% (8.30%, 27.5%) | 98% |
| Northwest China | 1 | 19.4% (17.4%, 21.9%) | – | |
| East China | 17 | 26.5% (23.1%, 31.0%) | 96% | |
| Central China | 4 | 20.6% (9.90%, 37.9%) | 98% | |
| South China | 11 | 13.0% (8.30%, 20.0%) | 97% | |
| Southwest China | 9 | 11.5% (7.40%, 17.4%) | 97% | |
| Not reported | 1 | 26.0% (22.5%, 29.6%) | – | |
| setting | VCT | 6 | 9.10 (6.5%, 12.3%) | 79% |
| MSM venues | 5 | 37.9% (34.2%, 41.5%) | 79% | |
| Social organization | 3 | 13.0% (5.70%, 25.9%) | 97% | |
| NGO | 2 | 16.0% (13.8%, 18.0%) | 0% | |
| Working group | 2 | 25.9% (23.1%, 28.6%) | 0% | |
| Multiple recruitment methods | 18 | 15.3% (11.5%, 19.4%) | 96% | |
| Not reported | 10 | 25.4% (22.5%, 29.1%) | 92% | |
| Sampling method | Snowball sampling | 18 | 22.5% (18.7%, 25.9%) | 96% |
| RDS | 2 | 23.1% (12.3%, 38.7%) | 94% | |
| Snowball sampling + RDS | 4 | 17.4% (13.8%, 22.5%) | 86% | |
| Convenience sampling | 4 | 22.5% (13.0%, 36.3%) | 97% | |
| Not reported or other | 18 | 13.8% (9.9%, 19.4%) | 97% | |
| Survey method | Face-to-face | 37 | 17.4% (15.3%, 20.0%) | 97% |
| Self-administered | 21 | 27.5% (23.7%, 32.0%) | 0% | |
| Web based | 1 | 5.70% (3.80%, 8.30%) | – | |
| Not reported | 6 | 27.5% (18.7%, 38.3%) | 97% | |
| Recall windows | 3 momths | 3 | 20.6% (18.0%, 23.7%) | 79% |
| 6 months | 42 | 35.1% (23.7%, 24.8%) | 97% | |
| 12 months | 1 | 35.1% (29.6%, 40.5%) | - | |
| Sample size | < 500 | 29 | 17.4% (13.8%, 21.3%) | 96% |
| 500–1000 | 9 | 16.7% (11. 5%, 23.7%) | 97% | |
| 1000–1500 | 5 | 25.9% (18.7%, 34.6%) | 98% | |
| > 1500 | 3 | 23.1% (18.7% , 28.6%) | 95% | |
| Study year | 2016 ago | 26 | 25.9% (25.4% , 26.5% ) | 97% |
| Since 2016 | 11 | 16.7% (16.0% , 18.0%) | 97% | |
| Not reported or others | 9 | 25.4% (23.7 , 27.0%) | 96% |
Fig. 3Sensitivity analysis diagram of the prevalence of heterosexual behaviors among MSM
Fig. 4Funnel plot of ES, seES
Fig. 5Forest chart of the condom utilization rate of the last heterosexual behavior among MSM
Fig. 6Forest chart of condom adherence rate of heterosexual behaviors among MSM
Fig. 7Forest chart of HIV pevalence in MSM with heterosexual behaviors