Budget Impact Analysis of an Epigenetic Test Used for Diagnosing Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder from the Perspective of a Laboratory Budget Holder in Manitoba, Canada.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) is a condition that results from prenatal alcohol exposure. Though diagnosis is important for individuals with FASD to receive appropriate care, diagnosis can be difficult to obtain. Accurate diagnoses can be impeded because of an inability to confirm prenatal alcohol exposure. This is particularly problematic in instances when family cannot confirm prenatal alcohol exposure. DNA methylation testing represents a novel approach to identifying prenatal alcohol exposure via epigenetic biomarkers. The objective was to assess the impact on laboratory expenditures from adopting DNA methylation additively to the diagnostic workup for patients suspected of having FASD for whom prenatal alcohol exposure cannot be otherwise confirmed.
METHODS: A budget impact model was developed that incorporates laboratory cost data, population data for Manitoba Canada, literature, and expert opinion. Probabilistic analysis was conducted for the primary analysis and deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the sensitivity of the budget impact to changes in model parameters. The perspective of the present study is that of the laboratory budget holder at a centralized laboratory in Manitoba, Canada.
RESULTS: Over a 5-year period, it was estimated that there would be 500 DNA methylation tests and the predicted budget impact to the laboratory budget holder was $207,574 (95% credible interval: 70,208-408,161) in Canadian dollars (CAD). Over a 10-year period, it was estimated that there would be 1017 DNA methylation tests and the predicted budget impact to the laboratory budget holder was CAD$439,470 (95% credible interval: 148,902-867,328).
CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide insight into the impact that DNA methylation testing would have on laboratory budgets if used in the diagnostic workup for FASD in individuals for whom prenatal alcohol exposure cannot be confirmed otherwise.

Key Points for Decision Makers

Introduction

Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) is a pattern of physical, mental, behavioral, and/or learning disabilities in individuals that results from prenatal alcohol exposure [1]. Children with FASD typically experience functional limitations in memory, attention, visual–spatial abilities, executive functioning, processing speed, intelligence, academic achievement, and language [2]. The burden of FASD is large and the average annual cost of FASD has been estimated at $21,642 in 2006 Canadian dollars (CAD) per individual when considering direct costs (medical, education, social services, out-of-pocket costs) and indirect costs (productivity losses), with estimates varying depending on age and the severity of a patient’s condition [3, 4].

Receiving a FASD diagnosis is a critical step in ensuring individuals receive appropriate interventions and care to improve outcomes [5]; however, diagnosis can be difficult to obtain [6]. Diagnosis requires a battery of tests conducted by a range of healthcare professionals and typically includes a physical examination, dysmorphology assessment, neurobehavioral assessment, and prenatal exposure to alcohol confirmation. However, accurate diagnoses can be impeded in some children because of an inability to confirm prenatal alcohol exposure. Confirmation of prenatal alcohol exposure represents an important component of diagnosis for many children, as the presentation of FASD can resemble other conditions [7]. This is particularly problematic for adopted children and in other instances when family members are not available or unwilling to confirm prenatal alcohol exposure.

DNA methylation testing represents a novel approach to identifying prenatal alcohol exposure that does not require confirmation of exposure by family members [8]. Briefly, this technique identifies prenatal alcohol exposure through epigenetic changes that occur at the molecular level in individuals exposed to alcohol before birth [8]. As a result, DNA methylation testing could be advantageous, if used additively to the standard diagnostic workup to aid in the identification of FASD in children for whom prenatal alcohol exposure cannot be otherwise confirmed. Another advantage of DNA methylation testing is that it can be used across a wide range of ages compared with other biomarkers such as meconium or umbilical cord blood testing, which are generally only applicable at or near the time of birth due to the need to have the biological material available for testing. Consideration of the economic impact, specifically the impact on operating budgets, of DNA methylation is an important step in assessing the technology for adoption into the clinical setting.

This study evaluated implications to a laboratory budget holder of the addition of DNA methylation testing to the conventional diagnostic workup for children with suspected FASD for whom prenatal alcohol exposure cannot be otherwise confirmed. Implementing DNA methylation testing is of interest in Manitoba, Canada, so this analysis focused on the cost and resource use in this province, recognizing similar analyses could be conducted in different jurisdictions. Careful planning that takes into consideration the likely cost and resource use implications of adopting a test is important for effective budgetary planning, particularly for new genetic tests that can be more expensive than other types of tests [9]. When combined with additional information regarding the costs and benefits of the technology, findings will be of use to laboratory budget holders for budget forecasting and for decision makers assessing whether or not to adopt DNA methylation testing into the clinical setting.

Methods

Study Design

An economic model was constructed to estimate the budget impact for a hypothetical cohort of children at risk for FASD. A probabilistic analysis (PA) was conducted for the reference case. Deterministic one-way and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the uncertainty associated with the analysis. The reference case analysis consisted of estimates of costs to the laboratory budget holder in Manitoba, Canada and 95% credible intervals for 5- and 10-year periods. Analysis was conducted in accordance with the recommendations of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomic Outcomes Research (ISPOR) guidelines for budget impact analysis (BIA) where applicable [10].

Model Structure

The study used a cohort-level condition-specific analytic model. The study modeled a scenario where DNA methylation is adopted additively to the standard diagnostic workup for patients suspected of FASD for whom prenatal alcohol exposure cannot be otherwise confirmed.

Historical birth rates and population projections from Statistics Canada were used to simulate the projected Manitoba, Canada cohort of children with FASD born between 2016/2017 and 2025/2026. To predict the number of FASD tests requiring DNA methylation, an estimate of the incidence of FASD in Manitoba was applied to the number of births occurring in each year from fiscal 2016/2017 to fiscal 2025/2026 and the simulated cohort of children was moved forward in time. To account for mortality, Statistics Canada Life Tables with inflated mortality to account for increased death rates in FASD were applied. An estimate for the percentage of children for whom prenatal alcohol exposure cannot be otherwise confirmed was applied to the number of children remaining in the cohort at age five to estimate the number of children that would receive DNA methylation testing as part of their diagnostic workup for FASD (10%, see Table 2). Five years old was chosen as the age when diagnostic testing would occur, as in many cases cognitive deficits resulting from prenatal alcohol exposure do not become apparent until after infancy and most interventions begin after 5 years of age [11]. Commencing primary school education can serve as a signalling event for the possible presence of FASD [8].

Table 2

Parameters included in analysis

Model parameter	Parameter value estimate (dispersion parameter)	Distribution (if included in PA)	References
Epidemiological parameters
FASD incidence rate in Manitoba	29/1000 (0.005)	Beta	[16]
Multiplier accounting for patients testing negative for FASD	1.6 (0.15)	Beta	[17]
Multiplier to adjust predicted births	1.0 (0.01)	Normal	[13]
Mortality in FASD (SMR)	3.15 (1.6)	Normal	[19]
Sensitivity of DNA metalation testing	91.7% (5.5%)	Beta	[8]
% of children who benefit from DNA methylation	10% (range: 5–20)	Uniform	Expert opinion
Cost parameters
Inflation rate	1.02 (0.005)	Normal	[25]
Cost of DNA methylation	CAD$387 (38.7)	Gamma	[21]
Historical and projected births in Manitoba
Historical births in Manitoba
2011/2012a	15,983	NA	[13]
2012/2013a	16,488	NA	[13]
2013/2014a	16,334	NA	[13]
2014/2015a	16703	NA	[13]
2015/2016a	16747	NA	[13]
2016/2017	16,967	NA	[13]
2017/2018	17,218	NA	[13]
2018/2019	17,477	NA	[13]
Projected future births in Manitobab
2019/2020	17,400	NA	[14]
2020/2021	17,500	NA	[14]
2021/2022	17,600	NA	[14]
2022/2023	17,700	NA	[14]
2023/2024	17,700	NA	[14]
2024/2025	17,800	NA	[14]
2025/2026	17,800	NA	[14]

CAD Canadian dollars, DNA deoxyribonucleic acid, FASD fetal alcohol spectrum disorder, PA probability analysis, SA sensitivity analysis, SMR standardized mortality ratio

aThe corresponding value was used for a deterministic scenario analysis but not for the reference case analysis

bThe parameters for projected future births were not varied independently in probabilistic analysis but instead were varied based on a single multiplier. For example, if this multiplier was set to 1.05 than the number of projected births in each year would be increased by 1.05

Since applying the incidence of FASD to the number of births per year would only account for positive cases, the number of children remaining in the cohort at 5 years old was inflated to reflect children who would receive testing but test negative. In addition, the model assumed that patients with FASD who test negative (false negatives) will go on to receive a second test in the following year. The cost of a DNA methylation test was applied to this group of patients. Costs were assumed to occur at the beginning of the year and mortality at the end of the year. Figure 1 provides a display of the cohort development process.

Fig. 1

Cohort development diagram. Calculations reported in Fig. 1 are deterministic and reflect the expected values using point estimates. DNA deoxyribonucleic acid, FASD fetal alcohol spectrum disorder

Perspective

The perspective of this analysis was that of a single centralized laboratory budget holder within Manitoba, Canada [12]. Given that the impact of a FASD diagnosis on healthcare utilization is not currently known, BIA on DNA methylation testing for FASD from the perspective of the broader healthcare system is not possible. From the perspective of the laboratory payer, the incremental cost associated with the addition of DNA methylation is the cost of tests alone. There are no alternative diagnostic tests likely to be displaced and it is not anticipated that laboratory costs would differ between diagnosed and undiagnosed patients with FASD.

Patient Population

The patient population investigated was patients in Manitoba, Canada suspected of FASD for whom prenatal alcohol exposure cannot be otherwise confirmed born between 2016/2017 to fiscal 2025/2026. In the reference case, it was assumed that 100% of children for whom prenatal alcohol exposure could not be otherwise confirmed would receive the test in the first year it becomes available. This assumption is tested in scenario analysis.

Time Horizon

The time horizon for the BIA was 10 years ranging from fiscal year 2020/2021 to fiscal year 2029/2030 for the reference case and all scenario and sensitivity analyses. For all scenarios it was assumed that DNA methylation testing is adopted into the clinical setting in fiscal year 2020/2021.

Budget Scenarios

The present study assessed the budget impact to the laboratory budget holder that would result from adopting DNA methylation testing additively into the diagnostic workup for patients undergoing testing for FASD for whom prenatal alcohol exposure cannot be otherwise confirmed. Budget impacts are reported annually and also aggregated over 5- and 10-year periods. Credible intervals are provided for the 5- and 10-year budget impacts.

Manitoba Birth Rates

Historical births per year in Manitoba between fiscal 2016/2017 and 2018/2019 were taken from Statistics Canada [13]. For projected birth rates, Statistics Canada provides multiple projection scenarios that are formulated using different assumptions. A medium growth scenario was used, which was based on the following national level assumptions:

the fertility rate reaches 1.59 children per woman in fiscal 2042/2043 and remains constant thereafter;

Canada’s life expectancy at birth reaches 87.0 years for males and 89.0 years for females in fiscal 2067/2068;

interprovincial migration within Canada is based on the trends observed between fiscal 2003/2004 and fiscal 2008/2009;

the immigration rate reaches 0.83% in fiscal 2042/2043 and remains constant thereafter;

the annual number of non-permanent residents reaches 1,397,060 in 2043 and remains constant thereafter; AND

net emigration reaches 0.15% in fiscal 2042/2043 and remains constant thereafter [14].

Incidence of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) in Manitoba

Though estimates of fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) in Manitoba exist, no estimates for the incidence of FASD are known [15]. The median value from the range of values reported by Thanh et al. (2014) in Alberta, Canada was used as an approximation of the incidence of FASD in Manitoba. This corresponded to 29 cases of FASD per 1000 births [16].

Children Requiring DNA Methylation

Children who undergo diagnostic testing for FASD and would benefit from the addition of DNA methylation to their diagnostic workup was estimated to be 10%. Clinical experts in the diagnostic process for FASD in Canada were consulted to arrive at this estimate. Given the uncertainty associated with this parameter, the implications of alternative values were assessed in sensitivity analysis.

Negative Cases

To account for those who undergo diagnostic testing for FASD but test negative, the present study used literature-based estimates to inflate the number of tests that would be performed in a given year. McLachlan et al. [17] conducted a chart review to investigate resource use in a group of 70 children assessed for FASD in Alberta, Canada. Of these children, 45 received a diagnosis of FASD, nine had their diagnosis deferred, and FASD was not diagnosed in 16. A deferred diagnosis indicates that FASD could not be confirmed but the diagnostic team was unwilling to rule out the condition and future reassessment is recommended [17]. The findings of McLachlan et al. suggest that the number of children receiving testing is likely to be 1.6 times greater than the number of children who receive a diagnosis. The 1.6 was calculated by dividing the 70 patients undergoing evaluation by the 45 who received a diagnosis.

Mortality in FASD

Based on the findings of a systematic review [18], one study reported mortality in FASD. Burd et al. reported a standardized mortality ratio (SMR) for a cohort of children diagnosed with FASD of 3.15 [19]. This value was applied to Statistics Canada Life Tables to inflate mortality in the general public to reflect that of individuals with FASD [20] and was used to predict annual mortality in the cohort of children for each year between birth and age 5 years.

Diagnostic Accuracy of DNA Methylation Testing

The number of patients who would receive repeat DNA methylation testing on a subsequent occasion was informed by literature on the diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation [8]. Specifically, a value of 91.7% for the sensitivity of DNA methylation testing was used to calculate the number of false negatives expected to occur and this number was used to approximate the number of children who would receive repeat testing. This corresponds to 8.3% of children receiving a second test in the following year.

DNA Methylation Test Costing

The cost per DNA methylation test was estimated using values from Shared Health Manitoba [21]. A bottom-up costing approach was undertaken. Cost items included were the cost of equipment, disposables associated with testing, reagents required for testing, compensation to laboratory staff, and other miscellaneous costs associated with testing. Overhead costs were not included. In total, the cost per test for DNA methylation was estimated to be $386.75 (in 2019 CAD). Table 1 contains a list of cost items associated with DNA methylation testing. To adjust for future inflation over the study’s time horizon, the Bank of Canada’s target inflation rate of 2.0% per year was used [22]. Although there is a health goods and services consumer price index (CPI) in Canada, it is recommended by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, to use the general goods and services CPI. To adjust all input costs into 2019 CAD (prior to extrapolating any costs into the future), the Statistics Canada CPI for all goods and services was used [23].

Table 1

Cost items of DNA methylation on a per-test basis

Cost component	Per test (2019 CAD)
DNA collection supplies	$24.27
DNA isolation supplies	$7.47
Disposable lab supplies	$15.01
Epic methylation array	$315.00
Miscellaneous costsa	$25.00
Total	$386.75

Wages are included in the Array cost components of Table 1 and include the cost of wages, pensions, and insurance benefits

DNA deoxyribonucleic acid

aThis value was an estimate meant to capture unforeseen costs associated with the testing process that would increase costs such as spills, procedural errors, and/or the breaking or expiring of laboratory supplies prior to use

Probabilistic Analysis

For the reference case analysis, a PA was conducted to directly incorporate uncertainty into the analysis and to estimate a 95% credible interval for the budget impact. PA was chosen for the reference analysis based on the recommendation of the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) [24]. CADTH recommends PA for the reference case analysis in economic evaluations, as deterministic analyses will provide biased results in modeling studies. For a list of parameter values, dispersion parameters, and distributions see Table 2. For PA, each parameter estimate in the model was assigned a distribution to represent the uncertainty associated with the parameter. To parameterize distributions, dispersion parameters for beta distributions were calculated using the beta distribution variance formula. For the cost of DNA methylation testing, a value of 10% of the parameter value estimate was used. For the future inflation rate, the annual variation around the historical trend expressed as a standard deviation for the Canadian CPI between 2010 and 2019 was used [25]. For the expected number of births, the annual variation expressed as a standard deviation around the historic trend was used over the period fiscal 2010/2011 to fiscal 2018/2019 [20]. For the SMR and the percentage of children who would benefit from DNA methylation testing, 50% of the parameter value estimate was used to reflect a higher degree of uncertainty with respect to these parameters. Of note, a lower bound of one was placed on the SMR for FASD. The justification for applying this bound is that mortality in patients with FASD would not be less than mortality in the general public.

Values were randomly sampled from these distributions and the budget impact was calculated. This process was repeated 5000 times [24]. The 95% credible interval was calculated by taking the range of values that corresponds to the 2.5–97.5% percentiles of the 5000 budget impacts generated in PA.

Validation

Each calculation was checked twice by a single analyst (PB) for accuracy. Additionally, hypotheses were formed regarding the change in the model estimated budget impact from variation in model inputs. For example, if the mortality rate was increased, the model-predicted budget impact should decrease, as fewer individuals would receive diagnostic testing. These hypothesis were then tested to ensure the model predicted as expected.

Scenario Analysis

Due to uncertainty in parameter estimates, multiple deterministic scenario analyses were conducted. Scenario analyses were chosen in consultation with experts.

In the reference case, the number of children in the simulated cohort who undergo diagnostic testing for FASD was inflated by 1.6 to account for patients who would be expected to test negative. However, this value is likely to correspond to a conservative use of diagnostic resources. To assess the budget impact that would result from more liberal use of diagnostic testing, a scenario analysis was conducted that increased the multiplier from 1.6 to 2.0.

The reference case assumed that the incidence of FASD in Manitoba is 29 per 1000 births. A scenario analysis was conducted assuming that this value is equal to the upper bound reported by Thanh et al. [16] for the incidence of FASD in Alberta, Canada. This corresponds to an incidence rate of 43.8 per 1000 births.

In the reference case analysis, it was assumed that all children who would benefit from DNA methylation testing receive it as soon as the technology becomes available. However, in a scenario analysis it was assumed that after becoming available in 2020/2021, the use of DNA methylation testing would start at 25% and increase by 25% each year until reaching 100% in 4 years.

In the reference case analysis, it was assumed that diagnostic testing occurs at 5 years of age. In a scenario analysis, it was assumed that diagnostic testing occurs at 10 years of age. The older age would translate to more fatalities occurring prior to individuals receiving diagnostic testing and subsequently fewer diagnostic tests compared with the reference case scenario. Age 10 years was also used as an alternative age at which children would receive diagnostic testing in a scenario analysis in a previous economic evaluation of FASD screening [26].

One-Way Sensitivity Analysis

For deterministic one-way sensitivity analysis, uncertain parameter values were varied one at a time over intervals provided by subject matter experts or taken from literature representing the plausible range of values for the corresponding parameter (see Table 3). The resulting budget impacts are presented in a tornado diagram.

Table 3

One-way sensitivity analysis ranges

Parameter	Range	Rationale for interval
(1) Cost of DNA methylation testing	$330–$1500 CAD	The lower bound is the cost of a methylation array alone and the upper bound is the cost of a genetic test if conducted at a private lab in Manitobab
(2) FASD incidence rate in Manitoba	14.2–43.8 per 1000 births	Range of values reported in Thanh et al. [16]
(3) Multiplier accounting for patients testing negative for FASD	1.6–1.9	Mean and upper bound of 95% CI in McLachlan et al. [17] a
(4) Mortality in FASD	1.00–6.29	Lower bound is mortality in general public and upper bound reflects SMR for FAS in Burd et al. [19]
(5) Multiplier to adjust predicted births	0.97–1.03	Range of projected birth rates reported by Statistics Canada for fiscal 2018/2019 [14]
(6) Inflation rate	0.90–2.90%	Range of CPI in Canada between 2010 and 2019 [25]
(7) Sensitivity of DNA methylation testing	78.1–98.9%	95% CI reported in Lussier et al. [8]a
(8) Percentage of children who benefit from DNA methylation	5–20%	Expert opinion

CI confidence interval, CPI consumer price index, DNA deoxyribonucleic acid, FAS fetal alcohol syndrome, FASD fetal alcohol spectrum disorder, SMR standardized mortality ratio

a95% confidence intervals were calculated assuming a beta distribution for the corresponding parameter

bThis information was obtained through personal communication with Shared Health Manitoba

Results

Reference Case

Table 4 shows the predicted budget impact if DNA methylation testing were used for each of the 10 years between fiscal 2020/2021 and 2029/2030 in the diagnostic workup in children for which prenatal alcohol exposure cannot be otherwise confirmed. In the present study, all cost estimates reflect the year for which they are reported and were not adjusted to a common year prior to reporting. Costs reported for an interval (i.e. 5-years or 10-years) reflect the estimated total number of units of currency the budget holder would be required to spend over the interval. Over a 5-year period it was estimated that there would be 500 DNA methylation tests and the predicted budget impact to the laboratory budget holder was CAD$207,574 (95% credible interval 70,208–408,161). Over a 10-year period, it was estimated that there would be 1017 DNA methylation tests and the predicted budget impact to the laboratory budget holder was CAD$439,470 (95% credible interval 148,902–867,328).

Table 4

Budget impact of DNA methylation testing: reference case

Fiscal year	DNA methylation tests	Budget impact (95% credible interval)
2020/2021	94	$39,091
2021/2022	100	$40,456
2022/2023	102	$41,879
2023/2024	102	$42,526
2024/2025	102	$43,621
5-year total	500	$207,574 ($70,208–$408,161)
2025/2026	103	$44,744
2026/2027	103	$45,896
2027/2028	103	$46,812
2028/2029	104	$48,018
2029/2030	104	$46,425
10-year total	1017	$439,470 ($148,902–$867,328)

DNA deoxyribonucleic acid, FASD fetal alcohol spectrum disorder

Deterministic Scenario Analyses

When evaluated at the point parameter value estimates presented in Table 2, the model predicts 408 DNA methylation tests and a budget impact of CAD$169,539 over 5 years and 830 DNA methylation tests and a budget impact of CAD$359,087 over 10 years. If the multiplier used to account for patients who would test negative is increased from 1.6 to 2.0, over 5 years it was estimated that there would be 506 tests and a budget impact of CAD$209,794. Over 10 years, it was estimated that there would be 1029 tests and a budget impact of CAD$444,827 (see Table 5A). If the incidence of FASD in Manitoba was 43.8 per 1000 births, over 5 years it was estimated that there would be 617 tests and a budget impact of CAD$256,062. Over 10 years, it was estimated that there would be 1254 tests and a budget impact of CAD$542,346 (see Table 5B). In the reference case analysis, it was assumed that 100% of patients who would benefit from DNA methylation receive it in the year the test becomes available. However, if after becoming available in 2020/2021 its use increased by 25% each year until reaching 100% in 4 years, over 5 years it was estimated that there would be 288 tests and a budget impact of CAD$122,991. Over 10 years, it was estimated that there would be 710 tests and a budget impact of CAD$312,538 (see Table 5C). If, instead of occurring at age 5 years, diagnostic testing occurred at age 10 years, over 5 years it was estimated that there would be 387 tests and a budget impact of CAD$160,857. Over 10 years, it was estimated there would be 799 tests and a budget impact of CAD$345,755 (see Table 5D). Table 5 shows the predicted budget impact and number of tests for each scenario analysis for each year between fiscal 2020/2021 and 2029/2030.

Table 5

Scenario analysis

Fiscal year	(A) DNA methylation testing: more liberal use of diagnostic testing		(B) DNA methylation testing: inflated FASD incidence rate		(C) DNA methylation testing: gradual uptake of 25% per year		(D) DNA methylation testing: testing at 10 years of age
	DNA methylation tests	Budget impact	DNA methylation tests	Budget impact	DNA methylation tests	Budget impact	DNA methylation tests	Budget impact
2020/2021	96	$39,498	116	$48,209	19	$9182	72	$30,018
2021/2022	101	$40,884	124	$49,901	41	$17,350	78	$31,586
2022/2023	103	$42,329	126	$51,664	62	$26,085	78	$31,917
2023/2024	103	$42,986	125	$52,466	83	$34,738	79	$33,290
2024/2025	103	$44,097	126	$53,822	83	$35,636	80	$34,046
5-year total	506	$209,794	617	$256,062	288	$122,991	387	$160,857
2025/2026	104	$45,236	127	$55,213	84	$36,556	81	$35,183
2026/2027	104	$46,403	127	$56,637	84	$37,499	82	$36,417
2027/2028	104	$47,331	127	$57,770	84	$38,249	83	$37,704
2028/2029	105	$48,551	128	$59,258	85	$39,235	83	$38,289
2029/2030	105	$47,511	128	$57,407	85	$38,009	83	$37,306
10-year total	1029	$444,827	1254	$542,346	710	$312,538	799	$345,755

DNA deoxyribonucleic acid, FASD fetal alcohol spectrum disorder

Deterministic One-Way Sensitivity Analysis

The parameter representing the cost of DNA methylation testing had the most impact in both the 5- and 10-year scenarios. This was followed by the percentage of children for whom prenatal alcohol exposure cannot be otherwise confirmed; FASD incidence in Manitoba; and the projected future inflation rate. The multiplier accounting for patients who would test negative for FASD; the sensitivity of DNA methylation testing to FASD; the multiplier for projected birth rates; and FASD mortality had comparatively lower budget impacts. Figure 2 is a tornado diagram demonstrating the relative impact of uncertain parameters on the budget in the 5- and 10-year scenarios.

Fig. 2

Tornado diagram. DNA deoxyribonucleic acid, FASD fetal alcohol spectrum disorder, SMR standardized mortality ratio

Discussion

The present study assessed the budget impact to the laboratory budget holder that would result from adopting DNA methylation testing additively into the diagnostic workup for patients undergoing testing for FASD for whom prenatal alcohol exposure cannot be otherwise confirmed. At present, we are aware of no other published BIA assessing diagnostic tools for patients suspected of FASD. Given the paucity of modeling studies related to this topic, the present study will contribute to the literature.

The findings of the present study suggests that 500 children could benefit from DNA methylation testing over the first 5 years of this study’s time horizon and 1017 children could benefit over the full 10-year time horizon. Children could benefit by either receiving a FASD diagnosis or by ruling out FASD so that other diagnostic investigations can be prioritized. Research suggests that a FASD diagnosis can potentially lead to children receiving more appropriate care, and appropriate FASD care can have substantial positive impacts for a person and their family members. A modeling study by Hopkins et al. estimated that a patient receiving specialized FASD care could expect to earn an additional $32,133 (2019 CAD) per year in income compared with someone not receiving this care [27]. Providing children who have developmental disability with greater opportunities is an important policy objective from an equity standpoint, given that these individuals experience lower education attainment and poorer labor force outcomes then the general public [28]. Additionally, a FASD diagnosis can be used as a mitigating factor in criminal justice sentencing in some jurisdictions. As a result, accurately identifying people with FASD could help to avoid further penalizing an already disadvantaged patient population. However, an important distinction is that the aforementioned benefits would not fall to the laboratory budget holder.

This study highlighted several areas where future research would be beneficial. It is possible that DNA methylation could also be used as a screening tool in patients at risk for FASD. In this context, screening refers to the initial wider use of a lower cost test before a higher cost test in a group of patients at risk or suspected of being at risk for a given disease or condition. An important consideration regarding the use of DNA methylation testing in this capacity is that there exist other screening tools for FASD that may potentially be more cost effective [26]. As a result, cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) would be required to determine if DNA methylation testing would be an efficient use of resources compared with the comparatively lower cost screening tools currently available [29]. As a result, a CEA investigating the use of DNA methylation as a screening tool would represent an area where additional research on this topic would be valuable. Additionally, the impact of a FASD diagnosis on healthcare resource use and patients’ quality of life is currently unknown. An understanding of how quality of life and resource use would change following a FASD diagnosis would represent an important contribution to the literature.

The present study is subject to several limitations. The first limitation is that this study relied on expert opinion for some model components due to a lack of published literature. The large degree of uncertainty associated with some of the parameter values resulted in large credible intervals for the budget impacts presented. Furthermore, it was assumed that DNA methylation would not increase the number of tests being conducted each year but instead increase the diagnostic accuracy of tests in a select group of patients. However, it is possible that if physicians had access to a test that did not require confirmation from families to identify prenatal alcohol exposure, they may send more children for FASD diagnostic testing, as the diagnostic process would be less likely hampered by an inability to confirm prenatal alcohol exposure. If the adoption of DNA methylation results in more tests being conducted, due to the ability to identify prenatal alcohol exposure in more children, the budget impact reported in this study will be underestimated.

Furthermore, this study limited its analysis to the perspective of the laboratory payer. As a result, the findings of the present study are not able to fully justify the adoption or rejection of DNA methylation for the target patient group from other system perspectives. Consequently, additional research on the value for money of this technology will be required. This study assumed that the cost of DNA methylation will be borne completely by the laboratory budget holder. However, it is possible that all or a portion of the test will be funded by patients out of pocket or their insurers. Finally, it was anticipated that DNA methylation would be adopted in a single centralized location with a single budget holder. Should it be the case that DNA methylation is not funded in this manner and costs are divided between several laboratory budget holders distributed throughout the province, cost estimates may be inaccurate.

Conclusion

To date, there have been few modeling studies in FASD and the present study represents the first BIA assessing an epigenetic test for FASD [26, 27, 30]. Findings of the present study will be of use to laboratory budget holders in jurisdictions with a similar population to Manitoba, Canada for budget forecasting and when combined with additional evidence on other costs and benefits associated with the technology for decision makers assessing whether or not to adopt DNA methylation testing into the clinical setting.

There is a group of children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) for whom a diagnosis is difficult to obtain due to an inability to confirm prenatal alcohol exposure.

The findings of the present study suggest that 500 children could benefit from DNA methylation testing over the first 5 years of this study’s time horizon and 1017 children could benefit over the full 10-year time horizon if adopted in Manitoba, Canada.

Over a 5-year period, the predicted budget impact to the laboratory budget holder from introducing DNA methylation was CAD$207,574 (95% credible interval: 70,208–408,161). Over a 10-year period, the predicted budget impact to the laboratory budget holder from introducing DNA methylation was CAD$439,470 (95% CI: 148,902–867,328).