Literature DB >> 34628562

Factors affecting diagnostic yield in stereotactic biopsy for brain lesions: a 5-year single-center series.

Bik Liang Lau1, Kugan Vijian2, Donald Ngian San Liew2, Albert Sii Hieng Wong2.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine the factors that are associated with the diagnostic yield of stereotactic brain biopsy. A retrospective analysis was performed on 50 consecutive patients who underwent stereotactic brain biopsies in a single institute from 2014 to 2019. Variables including age, gender, lesion topography and characteristics, biopsy methods, and surgeon's experience were analyzed along with diagnostic rate. This study included 31 male and 19 female patients with a mean age of 48.4 (range: 1-76). Of these, 25 underwent frameless brain-suite stereotactic biopsies, 15 were frameless Portable Brain-lab® stereotactic biopsies and 10 were frame-based CRW® stereotactic biopsies. There was no statistical difference between the diagnostic yield of the three methods. The diagnostic yield in our series was 76%. Age, gender, and biopsy methods had no impact on diagnostic yield. Periventricular and pineal lesion biopsies were significantly associated with negative diagnostic yield (p = 0.01) whereas larger lesions were significantly associated with a positive yield (p = 0.01) with the mean volume of lesions in the positive yield group (13.6 cc) being higher than the negative yield group (7 cc). The diagnostic yields seen between senior and junior neurosurgeons in the biopsy procedure were 95% and 63%, respectively (p = 0.02). Anatomical location of the lesion, volume of the lesion, and experience of the surgeon have significant impacts on the diagnostic yield in stereotactic brain biopsy. There was no statistical difference between the diagnostic yield of the three methods, age, gender, and depth of lesion.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain biopsy; Brain lesion; Diagnostic yield; Factors; Stereotactic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34628562     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01671-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  3 in total

1.  Accuracy of true frameless stereotaxy: in vivo measurement and laboratory phantom studies. Technical note.

Authors:  N L Dorward; O Alberti; J D Palmer; N D Kitchen; D G Thomas
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Failed stereotactic biopsy in a series of 518 cases.

Authors:  T M Soo; M Bernstein; J Provias; R Tasker; A Lozano; A Guha
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.875

3.  Stereotactic biopsy of brain tumors.

Authors:  C B Ostertag; H D Mennel; M Kiessling
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1980-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.