Katina C Calakos1,2, Ansel T Hillmer2,3,4, Gustavo A Angarita2, Stephen R Baldassarri5, Soheila Najafzadeh4, Paul R Emery4, David Matuskey2,3,4,6, Yiyun Huang3,4, Kelly P Cosgrove2,3,7. 1. Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. 3. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. 4. Yale PET Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care Medicine, & Sleep Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. 6. Department of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. 7. Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Chronic nicotine exposure desensitizes dopamine responses in animals, but it is not known if this occurs in human tobacco smokers. Deficits in dopamine function are likely to make smoking cessation difficult. We used positron emission tomography (PET) brain imaging with the dopamine D2/3 receptor agonist radioligand [11C]-(+)-PHNO to determine if abstinent smokers exhibit less amphetamine-induced dopamine release in the ventral striatum than nonsmokers, and whether this was associated with clinical correlates of smoking cessation. METHODS: Baseline [11C]-(+)-PHNO scans were acquired from smokers (n = 22, 7 female, abstinent 11 ± 9 days) and nonsmokers (n = 20, 7 female). A subset of thirty-seven participants (18 smokers) received oral amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg) three hours before a second [11C]-(+)-PHNO scan. Binding potential (BPND) (i.e., D2/3 receptor availability) was estimated at baseline and postamphetamine in the ventral striatum. Amphetamine-induced percent change in BPND was calculated to reflect dopamine release. Subjects also completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). RESULTS: There were no group differences in baseline BPND. Amphetamine-induced percent change in BPND in the ventral striatum was significantly lower in abstinent smokers compared to nonsmokers (p=0.019; d=0.82). Higher CES-D scores were significantly associated with lower ventral striatal percent change in BPND for abstinent smokers (rs=-0.627, p=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, abstinent smokers exhibited significantly less amphetamine-induced dopamine release in the ventral striatum than nonsmokers. In abstinent smokers, worse mood was significantly associated with less striatal dopamine release. Our findings highlight a potential neural mechanism that may underlie negative mood symptoms during early abstinence. IMPLICATIONS: This study combined quantitative PET imaging and an amphetamine challenge to examine striatal dopamine function during early smoking cessation attempts. The findings demonstrate that recently abstinent tobacco smokers exhibit significant, mood-associated striatal dopamine dysfunction compared to nonsmokers. This study advances our knowledge of the neurobiology underlying early quit attempts, and bridges novel neural findings with clinically relevant symptoms of smoking cessation. These results may explain the challenge of maintaining long-term abstinence from smoking, and can lend insight into the development of treatment strategies for smoking cessation.
INTRODUCTION: Chronic nicotine exposure desensitizes dopamine responses in animals, but it is not known if this occurs in human tobacco smokers. Deficits in dopamine function are likely to make smoking cessation difficult. We used positron emission tomography (PET) brain imaging with the dopamine D2/3 receptor agonist radioligand [11C]-(+)-PHNO to determine if abstinent smokers exhibit less amphetamine-induced dopamine release in the ventral striatum than nonsmokers, and whether this was associated with clinical correlates of smoking cessation. METHODS: Baseline [11C]-(+)-PHNO scans were acquired from smokers (n = 22, 7 female, abstinent 11 ± 9 days) and nonsmokers (n = 20, 7 female). A subset of thirty-seven participants (18 smokers) received oral amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg) three hours before a second [11C]-(+)-PHNO scan. Binding potential (BPND) (i.e., D2/3 receptor availability) was estimated at baseline and postamphetamine in the ventral striatum. Amphetamine-induced percent change in BPND was calculated to reflect dopamine release. Subjects also completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). RESULTS: There were no group differences in baseline BPND. Amphetamine-induced percent change in BPND in the ventral striatum was significantly lower in abstinent smokers compared to nonsmokers (p=0.019; d=0.82). Higher CES-D scores were significantly associated with lower ventral striatal percent change in BPND for abstinent smokers (rs=-0.627, p=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, abstinent smokers exhibited significantly less amphetamine-induced dopamine release in the ventral striatum than nonsmokers. In abstinent smokers, worse mood was significantly associated with less striatal dopamine release. Our findings highlight a potential neural mechanism that may underlie negative mood symptoms during early abstinence. IMPLICATIONS: This study combined quantitative PET imaging and an amphetamine challenge to examine striatal dopamine function during early smoking cessation attempts. The findings demonstrate that recently abstinent tobacco smokers exhibit significant, mood-associated striatal dopamine dysfunction compared to nonsmokers. This study advances our knowledge of the neurobiology underlying early quit attempts, and bridges novel neural findings with clinically relevant symptoms of smoking cessation. These results may explain the challenge of maintaining long-term abstinence from smoking, and can lend insight into the development of treatment strategies for smoking cessation.
Authors: Philip H Smith; Andrew J Bessette; Andrea H Weinberger; Christine E Sheffer; Sherry A McKee Journal: Prev Med Date: 2016-07-26 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Jean-Dominique Gallezot; Ming-Qiang Zheng; Keunpoong Lim; Shu-fei Lin; David Labaree; David Matuskey; Yiyun Huang; Yu-Shin Ding; Richard E Carson; Robert T Malison Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2014-04-14 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Katina C Calakos; Aleksandra Rusowicz; Brian Pittman; Jean-Dominique Gallezot; Marc N Potenza; Kelly P Cosgrove; David Matuskey Journal: Neurosci Lett Date: 2022-01-17 Impact factor: 3.046