| Literature DB >> 34627274 |
Bhaswati Roy1, Marlyn S Woo2, Susana Vacas1, Patricia Eshaghian3, Adupa P Rao4, Rajesh Kumar5,6,7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) patients present with a variety of symptoms, including mood and cognition deficits, in addition to classical respiratory, and autonomic issues. This suggests that brain injury, which can be examined with non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is a manifestation of this condition. However, brain tissue integrity in sites that regulate cognitive, autonomic, respiratory, and mood functions in CF patients is unclear. Our aim was to assess regional brain changes using high-resolution T1-weighted images based gray matter (GM) density and T2-relaxometry procedures in CF over control subjects.Entities:
Keywords: Cognition; Gray matter density; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mood; T2-relaxometery
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34627274 PMCID: PMC8502335 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-021-03092-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Demographics and other variables of CF and control subjects
| Variables | CF (n = 5) | Controls (n = 15) | p-values |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 29.7 ± 3.7 | 33.9 ± 4.5 | 0.08 |
| Sex [male] (%) | 3 (60%) | 10 (67%) | 0.79 |
| BMI (kg/m2, mean ± SD) | 22.0 ± 0.8 | 23.8 ± 3.9 | 0.33 |
| BAI | 7.8 ± 4.4 | 1.7 ± 4.2 | 0.02 |
| BDI-II | 5.0 ± 3.0 | 1.3 ± 2.8 | 0.03 |
| Total MoCA scores | 26.5 ± 1.5 | 28.2 ± 1.4 | 0.04 |
| MoCA: visuospatial | 4.1 ± 0.6 | 4.8 ± 0.5 | 0.02 |
| MoCA: naming | 3.0 ± 0.0 | 3.0 ± 0.0 | – |
| MoCA: attention | 5.9 ± 0.8 | 5.5 ± 0.8 | 0.34 |
| MoCA: language | 2.4 ± 0.5 | 2.8 ± 0.4 | 0.17 |
| MoCA: abstraction | 1.6 ± 0.5 | 2.0 ± 0.4 | 0.13 |
| MoCA: delayed recall | 4.1 ± 1.0 | 4.2 ± 1.0 | 0.85 |
| MoCA: orientation | 5.7 ± 0.4 | 5.9 ± 0.3 | 0.30 |
SD standard deviation, BMI body mass index, BDI-II Beck depression inventory II, BAI Beck anxiety inventory, MoCA Montreal cognitive assessment
Regional brain gray matter density (mean ± SE, mm3/voxel) of CF patients and control corrected for age and sex
| Brain areas | CF (n = 5) | Controls (n = 15) | p-values |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SE (95% confidence interval) | Mean ± SE (95% confidence interval) | ||
| L Prefr Cor | 0.44 ± 0.013 (0.42–0.47) | 0.38 ± 0.007 (0.37–0.40) | 0.001 |
| R Prefr Cor | 0.47 ± 0.012 (0.44–0.49) | 0.41 ± 0.007 (0.40–0.43) | 0.001 |
| R Vent Med Prefr Cor | 0.57 ± 0.012 (0.54–0.59) | 0.52 ± 0.006 (0.50–0.53) | 0.002 |
| L basal forebrain | 0.49 ± 0.011 (0.47–0.52) | 0.44 ± 0.006 (0.42–0.45) | < 0.001 |
| R basal forebrain | 0.45 ± 0.012 (0.43–0.48) | 0.39 ± 0.007 (0.38–0.41) | 0.001 |
| R amygdala | 0.38 ± 0.009 (0.36–0.40) | 0.34 ± 0.005 (0.33–0.35) | 0.001 |
| R hippocampus | 0.71 ± 0.006 (0.70–0.72) | 0.68 ± 0.003 (0.68–0.69) | 0.002 |
| R parahippocampus | 0.59 ± 0.007 (0.57–0.60) | 0.55 ± 0.004 (0.54–0.56) | < 0.001 |
| R cerebellar Cor | 0.75 ± 0.010 (0.73–0.77) | 0.70 ± 0.005 (0.69–0.71) | 0.001 |
| L insula | 0.63 ± 0.015 (0.60–0.66) | 0.56 ± 0.008 (0.55–0.58) | 0.001 |
| R insula | 0.61 ± 0.013 (0.59–0.64) | 0.55 ± 0.007 (0.54–0.57) | 0.001 |
| L mid frontal Cor | 0.60 ± 0.007 (0.58–0.61) | 0.55 ± 0.004 (0.55–0.56) | < 0.001 |
| L sup frontal Cor | 0.62 ± 0.011 (0.60–0.64) | 0.57 ± 0.006 (0.55–0.58) | 0.001 |
| L sup parietal Cor | 0.69 ± 0.019 (0.65–0.73) | 0.61 ± 0.010 (0.58–0.63) | 0.002 |
| R sup parietal Cor | 0.59 ± 0.016 (0.56–0.63) | 0.51 ± 0.009 (0.49–0.53) | 0.001 |
| R sup temp Cor | 0.67 ± 0.008 (0.65–0.69) | 0.63 ± 0.005 (0.62–0.64) | 0.001 |
CF cystic fibrosis, SE standard error, L left, Prefr prefrontal, Cor cortex, R right, Vent ventral, Med medial, Mid middle, Sup superior, Temp temporal
Fig. 1Brain regions with higher gray matter density in CF patients over control subjects. Sites with increased gray matter density included the bilateral insula (a, b), left frontal cortices (c), bilateral basal forebrain (d, e), right hippocampus (f), right cerebellum (g), and right amygdala (h). All images are in neurological convention (L left; R right; M middle). Color bar indicates t-statistic values
Regional brain T2-relaxation values (mean ± SE, ms) of CF patients and control corrected for age and sex
| Brain areas | CF (n = 5) | Controls (n = 15) | p-values |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SE (95% confidence interval) | Mean ± SE (95% confidence interval) | ||
| L Prefr Cor | 139.5 ± 3.3 (132.6–146.4) | 162.5 ± 1.8 (158.7–166.3) | < 0.001 |
| R Prefr Cor | 162.6 ± 7.7 (146.2–179) | 199.2 ± 4.3 (190.2–208.3) | 0.001 |
| L cerebellum | 123.6 ± 4.3 (114.5–132.6) | 149.3 ± 2.4 (144.3–154.3) | < 0.001 |
| R cerebellum | 123.3 ± 2.4 (118.1–128.4) | 136.0 ± 1.3 (133.1–138.8) | < 0.001 |
| L cerebellar tonsil | 126.9 ± 4.8 (116.6–137.1) | 160.8 ± 2.7 (155.2–166.5) | < 0.001 |
| R cerebellar tonsil | 127.5 ± 5.1 (116.7–138.3) | 159.1 ± 2.8 (153.1–165) | < 0.001 |
| R insula | 157.6 ± 5.5 (146–169.1) | 182.7 ± 3.0 (176.4–189.1) | 0.001 |
| Brainstem | 138.1 ± 6.5 (124.4–151.8) | 168.2 ± 3.6 (160.6–175.7) | 0.001 |
| L frontal Cor | 133.8 ± 3.3 (126.9–140.8) | 155.4 ± 1.8 (151.6–159.3) | < 0.001 |
| L parietal Cor | 152.4 ± 6.2 (139.2–165.6) | 182.6 ± 3.4 (175.3–189.8) | 0.001 |
| R parietal Cor | 128.0 ± 4.6 (118.4–137.7) | 148.9 ± 2.5 (143.6–154.3) | 0.001 |
| L Sup Temp Cor | 142.6 ± 4.8 (132.4–152.8) | 166.0 ± 2.7 (160.4–171.6) | 0.001 |
| R Sup Temp Cor | 132.1 ± 3.2 (125.3–138.9) | 153.6 ± 1.8 (149.9–157.3) | < 0.001 |
| Corpus callosum | 121.3 ± 7.0 (106.4–136.2) | 154.5 ± 3.9 (146.3–162.8) | 0.001 |
| L frontal WM | 119.7 ± 2.4 (114.7–124.7) | 134.2 ± 1.3 (131.5–137) | < 0.001 |
CF cystic fibrosis, ms millisecond, SE standard error, L left, Prefr prefrontal, Cor cortex, R right, Sup superior, Temp temporal, WM white matter
Fig. 2Brain sites with decreased T2 relaxation values in CF patients over control subjects. Reduced T2 relaxation values appeared in multiple regions and included in the right insula (a), bilateral prefrontal cortices (b, d), bilateral cerebellum (c, f), right corpus callosum (e), and left frontal cortices (g)