Literature DB >> 34627002

Serum GFAP and NfL levels in benign relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Marja Niiranen1, Aleksi Kontkanen2, Olli Jääskeläinen2, Hanna-Mari Tertsunen2, Tuomas Selander3, Päivi Hartikainen4, Nadine Huber5, Eino Solje6, Annakaisa Haapasalo5, Tarja Kokkola2, Tarja Lohioja4, Sanna-Kaisa Herukka6, Sakari Simula7, Anne M Remes8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels as potential discriminative biomarkers between benign relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (BRRMS) and aggressive relapsing-remitting MS (ARRMS).
METHODS: Serum GFAP and NfL levels were analyzed in patients with BRRMS (n = 34), ARRMS (n = 29), and healthy controls (n = 14) by using Single Molecule Array (Simoa). Patients with ARRMS had been treated with highly effective disease-modifying treatments (DMT) (fingolimod or natalizumab).
RESULTS: Serum GFAP levels in both BRRMS (median 210.19 pg/ml, IQR 163.69-287.19) and in ARRMS (median 188.60 pg/ml, IQR39.23-244.93) were significantly higher (p = 0.035 and p = 0.034, respectively) compared to healthy controls (median 117.93 pg/ml, IQR 60.28-183.83). Serum GFAP levels did not differ between BRRMS and ARRMS. There were no statistical differences in NfL levels between BRRMS, ARRMS and healthy controls. GFAP level was significantly higher (p = 0.04) in BRRMS without DMT (median 216.04 pg/ml, IQR 188.60-274.79) than in those BRRMS patients who had used DMT (median 196.26 pg/ml, IQR 133.33-325.54).
CONCLUSIONS: We found elevated levels of serum GFAP in both BRRMS and ARRMS compared to healthy controls, reflecting astrocytic activation. Serum NfL did not differ between BRRMS and ARRMS, probably due to the stable inflammatory phase of the disease and effective DMT use in ARRMS. Single serum NfL and GFAP measurements cannot separate a patient with BRRMS from effectively treated ARRMS after a long history of the disease, thus consecutive samples are needed in the follow-up.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benign multiple sclerosis; Biomarker; GFAP; Multiple sclerosis; Neurofilament

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34627002     DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mult Scler Relat Disord        ISSN: 2211-0348            Impact factor:   4.339


  4 in total

1.  Minocycline treatment in clinically isolated syndrome and serum NfL, GFAP, and metalloproteinase levels.

Authors:  Carlos Camara-Lemarroy; Luanne Metz; Jens Kuhle; David Leppert; Eline Willemse; David Kb Li; Anthony Traboulsee; Jamie Greenfield; Graziela Cerchiaro; Claudia Silva; V Wee Yong
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 5.855

Review 2.  An Update on Diagnostic Laboratory Biomarkers for Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Marwa Kaisey; Ghazal Lashgari; Justyna Fert-Bober; Daniel Ontaneda; Andrew J Solomon; Nancy L Sicotte
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 6.030

3.  Neurofilament light chain in blood as a diagnostic and predictive biomarker for multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liangxia Ning; Bin Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  Emerging Biomarkers of Multiple Sclerosis in the Blood and the CSF: A Focus on Neurofilaments and Therapeutic Considerations.

Authors:  Tamás Biernacki; Zsófia Kokas; Dániel Sandi; Judit Füvesi; Zsanett Fricska-Nagy; Péter Faragó; Tamás Zsigmond Kincses; Péter Klivényi; Krisztina Bencsik; László Vécsei
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.