| Literature DB >> 34626350 |
Chelsea Cheng1, Hilary Humphreys2,3, Bridget Kane4,5.
Abstract
In recent years, telemedicine has been increasingly incorporated into medical practice, a process which has now been accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. As telemedicine continues to progress, it is necessary for medical institutions to incorporate telemedicine into their curricula, and to provide students with the necessary skills and experience to effectively carry out telemedicine consultations. The purposes of this study are to review the involvement of medical students with telemedicine and to determine both the benefits and the challenges experienced. A literature review on the MEDLINE; CINAHL Plus; APA PsychInfo; Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts; and Health Business Elite databases was performed on September 7, 2020, yielding 561 results. 33 manuscripts were analysed, with the main benefits and challenges experienced by medical students summarized. In addition to increasing their understanding of the importance of telemedicine and the acquisition of telemedicine-specific skills, students may use telemedicine to act as a valuable workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic. Challenges that students face, such as discomfort with carrying out telemedicine consults and building rapport with patients, may be addressed through the incorporation of telemedicine teaching into the medical curricula through experiential learning. However, other more systemic challenges, such as technical difficulties and cost, need to be examined for the full benefits of telemedicine to be realized. Telemedicine is here to stay and has proven its worth during the COVID-19 pandemic, with medical students embracing its potential in assisting in medical clinics, simulation of clinical placements, and online classrooms.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Medical education; Medical students; Telehealth; Telemedicine
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34626350 PMCID: PMC8501374 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-021-02720-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ir J Med Sci ISSN: 0021-1265 Impact factor: 2.089
Fig. 1Flow of information through the phases of this review
Category 1: Studies evaluating telemedicine theory education with associated clinical telemedicine healthcare delivery, continued in next Table
| Article | Objectives | Method | Population | Major Findings | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abraham, HN et al [ | – a clerkship for students during COVID-19 | Cross-sectional qualitative study | 20 third-year medical students at Medical Centre, USA | – Provided diverse clinical experiences | No data on patient satisfaction with model |
| – increase student skill & confidence in telehealth with online modules | – Improved student confidence & appreciation of telehealth | ||||
| – participate in weekly telehealth clinic | – High student satisfaction | ||||
| – Learned to adapt to overcome challenges | |||||
| Bulik, RJ & GS Shokar [ | To implement & evaluate a primary care telemedicine elective for fourth-year medical students | Qualitative study | 7 fourth-year medical students at US University | – Telemedicine elective a valuable experience | Participation in the elective was self-determined |
| – “Very educational & inspiring” | |||||
| – “Look forward to incorporating electronic health into my medical practice” | |||||
| – “The advantages of telemedicine to the field of pathology in particular far outweigh any disadvantages” | |||||
| Holubová, A et al [ | To give medical students insight into current diabetes care technologies | Cross-sectional study | 28 medical students at University, Czech Republic | 77% evaluated the practical part as very suitable to be included in lectures | Limited results available |
| Iancu, AM et al [ | To discuss telehealth opportunities for medical students during & beyond COVID-19 | Viewpoint | Medical Students | – Telemedicine skills eg communication, physical exam, professionalism, technological literacy, should be incorporated into medical school curricula | |
| – Education through clinical e-visits & virtual consults | |||||
| – Difficulties: Technical challenges, patient discomfort, impaired provider-patient relationships | |||||
| Knight, P et al [ | To support the use of telehealth consultations for medical education | Mixed methods prospective cohort study | 2 medical student cohorts (n = 74, n = 76) at Australian University | - Respondents agreed/strongly agreed that the interpersonal aspects were satisfactory | – Short study timeframe |
| – Educational opportunities specific to mental health consulting | – Financial incentive payments through Medicare | ||||
| – Improved job readiness | |||||
| – Clinical benefits: Continuity of care, timely access to specialists, quicker referrals & follow-ups | |||||
| – Poor picture & sound quality |
Category 1 continued: Studies evaluating telemedicine theory education with associated clinical telemedicine healthcare delivery
| Article | Objectives | Method | Population | Major Findings | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pathipati, AS et al [ | To propose a model for incorporation of telemedicine training into medical school curricula | Viewpoint | Medical Students in all years | – Formal telemedicine training should be incorporated into medical schools | |
| – Consider “digital call” & “digital health rotations” | |||||
| – Challenges include carrying out physical exams, technology (blood pressure), pain management | |||||
| Rolak, S. et al. [ | To discuss current challenges in medical student education due to COVID-19, responses that have been adopted, and future directions | Opinion review | Medical students in all years | – Benefits: reduces face-to-face contact, reduce risk for viral transmission & need for travel | – Small sample size |
| – Can help with routine outpatient telemedicine visits & patient education | Not blinded | ||||
| – Challenges include administrative barriers, payment discrepancies | |||||
| – Future suggestions include supervised telemedicine visits, curriculum on virtual etiquette & remote physical exam skills | |||||
| Shawagfeh, A. & E. Shanina [ | To develop a formal Tele-Neurology training program for medical students during their neurology Clerkship | Pilot study | 97 medical students (41 fourth year, 56 third year) at US University | – Gained knowledge on telemedicine basics & principles | |
| – Improved interprofessional communication, ability to interpret common tests & explain them to the patient | |||||
| – Biggest challenge is taking initiative & providing orientation | |||||
| Waseh, S. & A. P. Dicker [ | To discuss current experiences & learnings from medical schools implementing telemedicine into medical education | Mixed methods review | 9 texts meeting inclusion criteria; 70 institutions | – > 60 allopathic medical schools in the USA provide some form of telemedicine experience in their clerkship offerings | - Small sample size |
| – 53% (9/17) medical schools utilize patient encounters to develop telemedicine competencies in medical students | – Need further studies on efficacy of telemedicine implementation | ||||
| Yaghobian, S., et al. [ | To examine the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of telemedicine education and training | Cross-sectional study | 3312 medical students (69.8%) and residents in France | – > 50% felt telemedicine could improve medical practice | - Low participation rates |
| – 82.8% believed telemedicine improved access to care | – Overrepresentation of informed students (participation bias) | ||||
| – 84.7% who had not practised telemedicine wanted to before the end of their studies |
Category 2: Studies solely evaluating clinical telemedicine healthcare delivery, continued in the next Table
| Article | Objectives | Method | Population | Major Findings | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annis, T et al. [ | To evaluate a remote patient monitoring system for patients with COVID-19 symptoms | Mixed methods cross-sectional study | 300 patients with COVID-19 symptoms in the USA | – Developed an effective COVID-19 remote monitoring pathway staffed by medical students, residents, & supervising physicians | Requires stronger analysis of patient experience & factors influencing patient participation in pathway |
| – High patient satisfaction | |||||
| Berwick, KL & L Applebee [ | To discuss concerns relating to telephone consultations and how these may lessen the positive impacts of placements in general practice | Letter to the editor | Fourth-year medical students at University in England | – Telephone consultations limit opportunities to elicit full histories & perform physical exams | |
| – Lifestyle advice less frequently provided, restricting holistic approach to patient management | |||||
| Chao, TN et al. [ | To develop a virtual surgical rotation curriculum during COVID-19 | Implement virtual elective | Medical students enrolled in virtual Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery elective at US University | – Provided direct patient contact | – Limited evaluation of medical students’ non-cognitive domains |
| – One-on-one engagement with attendings & faculty | – Not a true replacement for clinic & OR experience | ||||
| – Exposure to telehealth | – Limited acquisition of exam, procedural & technical skills | ||||
| Chen, P et al. [ | Determine attitudes & telehealth use in China among medical professionals & patients; identify factors affecting use | Cross-sectional study | Medical professionals, medical students & patients at 3 large hospitals in China | – 86.91% agree telehealth offered “prompt engagement in self-care” | Respondents all literate; excluded those with little education |
| – 72% agree telehealth “reduces healthcare costs” | |||||
| – Concerns: data reliability, privacy, fragmentation of care |
Category 2 continued: Studies solely evaluating clinical telemedicine healthcare delivery, continued in the next Table
| Article | Objectives | Method | Population | Major Findings | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| de Araújo Novaes, M, et al. [ | To improve medical student education through telehealth | Experiment field study | 9 medical students in Brazil | – High satisfaction | Data not provided |
| – Enriched learning | |||||
| – Increased collaboration among students, faculty & staff | |||||
| – Learned skills necessary for future digital practices | |||||
| Dzara, K, et al. [ | To evaluate training, supervision & usefulness of telepsychiatry rotation | Cross-sectional study | 8 residents & 7 medical students in the USA | – 100% agree telepsychiatry enhances overall training | - Small sample size |
| – 86.7% believe telepsychiatry can treat variety of conditions | – No objective pre-/post-test | ||||
| – 60% had technical difficulties | – No validated survey tool | ||||
| – 60% had difficulty reading patient affect | – Did not assess if didactic or clinical preparation influenced views | ||||
| – 64.3% wanted more clinical experience | |||||
| – 80% felt more comfortable using telepsychiatry in the future | |||||
| Greisman, L., et al. [ | To evaluate feasibility & cost of a smartphone-based teledermatology consult service | Cross-sectional study | 2 fourth-year medical students in the USA; 93 cases evaluated by the consult service | – In 100% of cases, medical students provided enough information for diagnosis | - Small sample size |
| – Students became familiar with specific management recommendations | – Limited sustainability | ||||
| – Collaborative team approach | |||||
| – Poor patient follow-up | |||||
| – Fixed upfront cost | |||||
| – Students wanted greater supervision | |||||
| Heflin, KJ, et al. [ | To describe a medical student-led initiative to provide care during COVID-19 | Editorial/Case study | 16 medical students in the USA | – Tele-health services may have improved continuity of care | Lack of access to telehealth for individuals dealing with homelessness |
| – Facilitated conversations about social determinants of health | |||||
| – Patients no longer wished to continue participating once health needs met | |||||
| – Technical and access challenges |
Category 2 continued: Studies solely evaluating clinical telemedicine healthcare delivery, continued in the next Table
| Article | Objectives | Method | Population | Major Findings | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Himstead, AS, et al. [ | To determine if medical students could sufficiently use a non-mydriatic fundus camera in a teleophthalmology program | Retrospective study | Medical students participating in Floating Doctors Non-profit Org. in Panama; 126 images from 70 patients | – Most common (37.07%) photo quality was “Not ideal, but able to exclude subtle findings” | Limited results available |
| – With minimal training, medical students & GPs can use remote retinal cameras to assist with diagnosis & treatment of ophthalmic conditions | |||||
| Mukundan, S, Jr, et al. [ | To create a telemedicine system for medical students on elective study at remote locations | Experiment | 1 senior visiting British medical student; Telemedicine system between Solomon Islands & USA | – Telemedicine system provided considerable support to physicians & patients at each remote location | Full data not obtained for all referrals |
| – Allowed faculty at central site to continue to supervise students abroad | |||||
| Rallis, KS & AM Allen Tejerina [ | To discuss integration & challenges of telemedicine education & training in tele-oncology | Letter | Medical students | – Suggestions: streaming tele-oncology clinics, virtual MDTs, remote access to electronic medical records | |
| – Challenges: difficulty practising physical exams, empathy, motivational interviewing, patient discomfort | |||||
| Schmidt, S & E Sheline [ | To describe an telehealth coaching pilot for medical students to teach patient self-management skills | Cross-sectional study | 30+ medical students at Emory University, USA | – High learner satisfaction - impactful experiences & improved understanding of barriers patients face in accessing health care | – Small sample size |
| – Positive clinical outcomes for patients - 73% of patients who attended more than one Healthy Living class lost weight | – No control group | ||||
| – Selection bias |
Category 2 continued: Studies solely evaluating clinical telemedicine healthcare delivery
| Article | Objectives | Method | Population | Major Findings | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vasquez-Cevallos, LA, et al. [ | To present Telemedicine Platform (TMP) for rural healthcare services in Ecuado | Field study | 124 senior undergraduate medical students (63 completed questionnaire) & 6 faculty members in Ecuador; 262 teleconsultations | – Telemedicine Platform useful for learning (100%) | – Small sample size |
| – Advantages: increased access to specialists, enhanced practical knowledge, assistance in diagnosis & treatment | – Different student numbers in each period | ||||
| – 100% would use the platform in their rural service | |||||
| – Challenges: delays by faculty in answering, connectivity problems | |||||
| Wernhart, A, et al. [ | To assess how medical students & healthcare professionals perceive eHealth & telemedicine | Cross-sectional study | 51.6% medical students in Austria | – Participants expressed moderate knowledge of eHealth & telemedicine concepts; higher levels among employees compared to students | – Self-reported data (response bias) |
| – Students optimistic that telemedicine reduces healthcare costs | – Sampling limits generalizability | ||||
| – Doubts if telemedicine enhances doctor-patient relationship | |||||
| – Data security & privacy issues | |||||
| Whittemore, MS, et al. [ | To evaluate an insulin titration telemedicine program | Cross-sectional study | Medical students, volunteer endocrinologists & diabetes educators in the USA | – Significant decrease found between pre- & post-intervention HbA1c’s | – Limited results available |
| – Further evaluation needed |
Category 3: Studies solely evaluating telemedicine theory education, continued in the next Table
| Article | Objectives | Method | Population | Major Findings | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barth, J, et al. [ | To document & identify reasons for insecurity in medical students during emergency phone consultations | Mixed methods cross-sectional cohorts | 137 fifth-year medical students from Inst of Family Medicine, Switzerland | – Students felt most insecure during history-taking due to lack of clinical knowledge & experience, urgency of call | Limited generalizability |
| – Doubts about reliability of information from caller | |||||
| – Lack of physical examination | |||||
| Brockes, C, et al. [ | To systematically evaluate “Clinical Telemedicine/e-Health” module over 8 years | Mixed methods prospective cohorts | Second-, third- & fourth-year medical students in Switzerland (23–35 students in various years) | – In 2015, 93% of students wanted to provide telemedicine care for chronic and older patients in their homes | – Evaluations were not performed in the same way every year |
| – Increased overall satisfaction & understanding of telemedicine as a supplement in traditional medical consultations | – Number of participating students changed year-by-year | ||||
| Jonas, CE, et al. [ | To design, administer & evaluate an Introduction to Telehealth course | Cross-sectional study | 149 third-year medical students (uniformed services) in the USA | – High interest and acceptance of course | Limited generalizability (unique study pop.) |
| – 10.1% increase in knowledge is modest for time invested | |||||
| – 80% indicated future plans to practice telehealth | |||||
| Hindman, D. J., et al. [ | To report on implementation of a telephone medicine curriculum (part of paediatrics clerkship) | Prospective cohort study | 245 medical students, with 67 students receiving the intervention | – Students who received the telephone medicine curriculum had significantly higher mean overall scores on simulated OSCE telephone medicine case | – Confounding - some students completed paediatrics clerkship prior to study |
| – Convenience sampling | |||||
| – Limited generalizability |
Category 3 continued: Studies solely evaluating telemedicine theory education
| Article | Objectives | Method | Population | Major Findings | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naik, N, et al. [ | To develop a simulation program for video-based communication skills | Cross-sectional study | Fourth-year medical students in the USA | – Initial feedback for the course was positive | – Limited results available |
| – Taught students telemedicine-specific communication skills | – Further evaluation needed | ||||
| Newcomb, AB, et al. [ | To pilot a class to improve communication skills in video consults | Cross-sectional study | 5 fourth-year medical students in a surgical internship, USA | – Felt the class introduced new skills & reinforced current ones | Small sample size limiting generalizability |
| – Most reported higher self-confidence in target communication skills following the module | |||||
| – Difficulty interpreting patient distress | |||||
| – Poor lighting and body positioning | |||||
| Rienits, H, et al. [ | To develop a clinical skills lesson to prepare students for rural practice placements | Mixed methods cross-sectional study | 59 third-year medical students | – Improved understanding of the issues, procedures & confidence in conducting a telehealth consultation | Small sample size |
| Walker, C, et al. [ | To introduce an educational intervention to improve student knowledge and confidence with telemedicine | Cross-sectional study | 153 second-year medical students (93 completed questionnaire) | – Higher mean post-test scores in telemedicine knowledge & confidence | – Lack of objective measures |
| – Most improvement in equipment operation & “designing an office conducive for a telemedicine visit” | – Low response rate | ||||
| – Students want more simulation time |
Medical and surgical subspecialties using telemedicine with medical students
| Article | Specialty |
|---|---|
| Abraham, H. N., et al. | Primary Care |
| Berwick, K. L. and L. Applebee | Primary Care |
| Bulik, R. J. and G. S. Shokar | Primary Care |
| Heflin, K. J., et al. | Primary Care; Mental Health |
| Knight, P., et al. | Primary Care |
| Vasquez-Cevallos, L. A., et al. | Primary Care |
| Whittemore, M. S., et al. | Primary Care |
| Shawagfeh, A. and E. Shanina | Neurology |
| Rallis, K. S. and A. M. Allen Tejerina | Oncology |
| Dzara, K., et al. | Psychiatry |
| Greisman, L., et al. | Dermatology |
| Himstead, A. S., et al. | Ophthalmology |
| Chao, T. N., et al. | Otolaryngology |