Literature DB >> 34626319

Addressing misconceptions of flow disruption studies in "Is non-stop always better? Examining assumptions behind the concept of flow disruptions in studies of robot-assisted surgery".

Ken Catchpole1, Connor Lusk2, Matthias Weigl3, Jennifer Anger4, Tara Cohen4.   

Abstract

This letter to the editor provides a response to "Is non-stop always better? Examining assumptions behind the concept of flow disruptions in studies of robot-assisted surgery." The authors provide much needed clarification on misconceptions of flow disruption studies. The evolving methodology is not aimed at creating a "non-stop" flow, or optimizing efficiency, but understanding the clinical process from a systems perspective.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flow disruptions; Robot-assisted surgery; Systems safety

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34626319     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01318-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  4 in total

Review 1.  Interruptions in the wild: Development of a sociotechnical systems model of interruptions in the emergency department through a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicole E Werner; Richard J Holden
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  Human factors and cardiac surgery: a multicenter study.

Authors:  M R de Leval; J Carthey; D J Wright; V T Farewell; J T Reason
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Framework for direct observation of performance and safety in healthcare.

Authors:  Ken Catchpole; David M Neyens; James Abernathy; David Allison; Anjali Joseph; Scott T Reeves
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 7.035

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.