| Literature DB >> 34626319 |
Ken Catchpole1, Connor Lusk2, Matthias Weigl3, Jennifer Anger4, Tara Cohen4.
Abstract
This letter to the editor provides a response to "Is non-stop always better? Examining assumptions behind the concept of flow disruptions in studies of robot-assisted surgery." The authors provide much needed clarification on misconceptions of flow disruption studies. The evolving methodology is not aimed at creating a "non-stop" flow, or optimizing efficiency, but understanding the clinical process from a systems perspective.Entities:
Keywords: Flow disruptions; Robot-assisted surgery; Systems safety
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34626319 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01318-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Robot Surg ISSN: 1863-2483