| Literature DB >> 34625663 |
Shinichi Kobayashi1, Yoshinobu Kanda2, Takaaki Konuma3, Yoshihiro Inamoto4, Kimikazu Matsumoto5, Naoyuki Uchida6, Kazuhiro Ikegame7, Toshihiro Miyamoto8, Noriko Doki9, Hirohisa Nakamae10, Yuta Katayama11, Satoshi Takahashi12, Souichi Shiratori13, Shoji Saito14, Toshiro Kawakita15, Junya Kanda16, Takahiro Fukuda4, Yoshiko Atsuta17,18, Fumihiko Kimura19.
Abstract
Relapsed acute leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is associated with poor prognosis. In a subset of patients, durable remissions can be achieved with a second allo-HSCT (allo-HSCT2). However, many patients experience relapse after allo-HSCT2 and they may be considered for a third allo-HSCT (allo-HSCT3). Nevertheless, the benefit of allo-HSCT3 remains unconfirmed. Thus, herein a retrospective analysis of 253 allo-HSCT3s in patients with relapsed/refractory acute leukemia was carried out. In total, 29 (11.5%) survived at a median follow-up of 794 days (range: 87-4 619). The 3-year leukemia-free survival and overall survival (OS) rates were 9.7% and 10.9%, respectively. Patients who maintained remission for ≥2 years after allo-HSCT2 had a significantly better 3-year OS (35.8%) than those who experienced early relapse (<1 year, 7.8%; 1-2 years, 14.0%; P = 0.004). Complete remission at allo-HSCT3, performance status score of 0-1 at allo-HSCT3, grade I acute graft-versus-host disease after allo-HSCT2, and relapse ≥2 years after allo-HSCT2 were associated with better survival in patients who received allo-HSCT3. The prognosis after allo-HSCT3 in patients with relapsed/refractory acute leukemia is generally unfavorable. However, given the lack of alternative treatment options, allo-HSCT3 may be considered in a group of patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34625663 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-021-01485-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant ISSN: 0268-3369 Impact factor: 5.483