Literature DB >> 34625482

Guide sheath versus non-guide sheath method for endobronchial ultrasound-guided biopsy of peripheral pulmonary lesions: a multicentre randomised trial.

Masahide Oki1, Hideo Saka2, Tatsuya Imabayashi3, Daisuke Himeji4, Yoichi Nishii5, Harunori Nakashima6, Daisuke Minami7, Shotaro Okachi8, Yasuyuki Mizumori9, Masahiko Ando10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guide sheaths (GSs) have been widely used during radial probe endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy (rEBUS-TBB) of peripheral pulmonary lesions. However, it remains unknown whether a GS enhances the diagnostic yield. We compared the diagnostic yields of small peripheral pulmonary lesions between rEBUS-TBB with and without a GS.
METHODS: In eight institutions, patients with peripheral pulmonary lesions ≤30 mm in diameter were enrolled and randomised to undergo rEBUS-TBB with a GS (GS group) or without a GS (non-GS group) using a 4.0-mm thin bronchoscope, virtual bronchoscopic navigation and fluoroscopy. The primary end-point was the diagnostic yield of the histology specimens.
RESULTS: A total of 605 patients were enrolled; ultimately, data on 596 (300 in the GS group and 296 in the non-GS group) with peripheral pulmonary lesions having a longest median diameter of 19.6 mm were analysed. The diagnostic yield of histological specimens from the GS group was significantly higher than that from the non-GS group (55.3% versus 46.6%; p=0.033). Interactions were evident between the diagnostic yields, procedures, lobar locations (upper lobe versus other regions; p=0.003) and lesion texture (solid versus part-solid nodules; p=0.072).
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic yield for small peripheral pulmonary lesions afforded by rEBUS-TBB using a GS was higher than that without a GS.
Copyright ©The authors 2022. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34625482     DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01678-2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   33.795


  3 in total

1.  Use of a highly sensitive lung cancer compact panel to detect KRAS G12D in the wash fluid from a lung tumor: A case report.

Authors:  Daisuke Minami; Nagio Takigawa; Yasuhiro Nakajima; Nobuaki Miyahara; Yasuyuki Mizumori; Mitsuhiro Ueda; Seiji Nakamura; Fumihiko Suzuki; Yoshiharu Sato; Kei Morikawa; Arihiko Kanehiro
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.223

2.  Comparison of the analytical performance of the Oncomine dx target test focusing on bronchoscopic biopsy forceps size in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Tadashi Sakaguchi; Yoichi Nishii; Akemi Iketani; Seiya Esumi; Maki Esumi; Kazuki Furuhashi; Yuki Nakamura; Yuta Suzuki; Kentaro Ito; Kentaro Fujiwara; Koji Katsuta; Osamu Taguchi; Osamu Hataji
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 3.  Advanced Bronchoscopic Technologies for Biopsy of the Pulmonary Nodule: A 2021 Review.

Authors:  Micah Z Levine; Sam Goodman; Robert J Lentz; Fabien Maldonado; Otis B Rickman; James Katsis
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.