Jeffrey Guccione1, Moataz Soliman2, Miao Zhang3, Mouhammed Amir Habra4, Katrina Collins5, Jianping Zhao3, Khaled M Elsayes2. 1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 3. Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 4. Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 5. Department of Pathology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Adrenal adenoma with myelolipomatous degeneration (AMD) is a rarely reported and often overlooked entity. The aim of this study is to improve understanding of these lesions by characterizing the imaging findings with pathologic and clinical correlation. METHODS: In the largest series to date, we report 11 nodules in 11 patients confirmed with a pathologic diagnosis of AMD. The available cross-sectional imaging and histopathologic features were reviewed by two radiologists and two pathologists, respectively. Clinical and laboratory data for each patient were obtained from the electronic medical records, when available. RESULTS: All 11 patients had a CT prior to resection or biopsy of the adrenal nodule, with five having received an adrenal mass protocol study. An MRI was available in three patients. The median size of the nodules on imaging was 4.5 cm (range 2.8-8.7) and all but one had macroscopic fat. The largest focus of macroscopic fat had a median size of 0.7 cm (range 0.2-1.6) and on average was 14.4% the size of the tumor, using greatest dimensions. Four (36.4%) patients had a diagnosis of Cushing syndrome prior to nodule resection. CONCLUSIONS: Not all adrenal nodules with macroscopic fat on imaging are pure myelolipomas. An AMD should be considered, especially if the foci of fat are small and other features of an adenoma are present. Some may also be associated with Cushing syndrome. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Myelolipomatous degeneration within an adrenal adenoma has only rarely been previously reported with very few reports emphasizing the imaging features. There may be an association with cortisol hypersecretion and improved recognition of this entity could lead to changes in clinical management.
OBJECTIVES: Adrenal adenoma with myelolipomatous degeneration (AMD) is a rarely reported and often overlooked entity. The aim of this study is to improve understanding of these lesions by characterizing the imaging findings with pathologic and clinical correlation. METHODS: In the largest series to date, we report 11 nodules in 11 patients confirmed with a pathologic diagnosis of AMD. The available cross-sectional imaging and histopathologic features were reviewed by two radiologists and two pathologists, respectively. Clinical and laboratory data for each patient were obtained from the electronic medical records, when available. RESULTS: All 11 patients had a CT prior to resection or biopsy of the adrenal nodule, with five having received an adrenal mass protocol study. An MRI was available in three patients. The median size of the nodules on imaging was 4.5 cm (range 2.8-8.7) and all but one had macroscopic fat. The largest focus of macroscopic fat had a median size of 0.7 cm (range 0.2-1.6) and on average was 14.4% the size of the tumor, using greatest dimensions. Four (36.4%) patients had a diagnosis of Cushing syndrome prior to nodule resection. CONCLUSIONS: Not all adrenal nodules with macroscopic fat on imaging are pure myelolipomas. An AMD should be considered, especially if the foci of fat are small and other features of an adenoma are present. Some may also be associated with Cushing syndrome. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Myelolipomatous degeneration within an adrenal adenoma has only rarely been previously reported with very few reports emphasizing the imaging features. There may be an association with cortisol hypersecretion and improved recognition of this entity could lead to changes in clinical management.
Authors: Elaine M Caoili; Melvyn Korobkin; Isaac R Francis; Richard H Cohan; Joel F Platt; N Reed Dunnick; Kartik I Raghupathi Journal: Radiology Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 11.105