Deena Peyser1, Robyn Sysko1, Lauren Webb2, Tom Hildebrandt1. 1. Eating and Weight Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA. 2. Department of Psychology, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The evaluation and use of treatment fidelity procedures are rare in the development and implementation of psychological interventions. This article aims to review the construct of treatment fidelity, highlight limitations to currently available measures, and introduce a conceptual framework for studying and adapting fidelity measures in clinical research and practice using eating disorders as an example. METHOD: As treatment fidelity assesses whether an intervention was delivered as intended, we operationalized this construct as: (a) treatment adherence, (b) therapist competence, and (c) treatment differentiation. RESULTS: There is a significant gap in the literature assessing and documenting treatment fidelity. Available studies indicate that existing adherence measures can be time consuming, costly, and are not widely used in the field. Furthermore, therapist competence is a complex and context-dependent construct that is challenging to measure. Finally, treatment differentiation is often inferred by ensuring adherence. DISCUSSION: The development of simplified formal tests of treatment fidelity would help draw conclusions about treatment efficacy and improve the dissemination and implementation of interventions to promote optimal clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: The evaluation and use of treatment fidelity procedures are rare in the development and implementation of psychological interventions. This article aims to review the construct of treatment fidelity, highlight limitations to currently available measures, and introduce a conceptual framework for studying and adapting fidelity measures in clinical research and practice using eating disorders as an example. METHOD: As treatment fidelity assesses whether an intervention was delivered as intended, we operationalized this construct as: (a) treatment adherence, (b) therapist competence, and (c) treatment differentiation. RESULTS: There is a significant gap in the literature assessing and documenting treatment fidelity. Available studies indicate that existing adherence measures can be time consuming, costly, and are not widely used in the field. Furthermore, therapist competence is a complex and context-dependent construct that is challenging to measure. Finally, treatment differentiation is often inferred by ensuring adherence. DISCUSSION: The development of simplified formal tests of treatment fidelity would help draw conclusions about treatment efficacy and improve the dissemination and implementation of interventions to promote optimal clinical outcomes.
Authors: Katharine L Loeb; G Terence Wilson; Erich Labouvie; Elizabeth M Pratt; Jumi Hayaki; B Timothy Walsh; W Stewart Agras; Christopher G Fairburn Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2005-12
Authors: Mario Alvarez-Jimenez; Darryl Wade; Sue Cotton; Donna Gee; Tracey Pearce; Kingsley Crisp; Patrick D McGorry; John F Gleeson Journal: Aust N Z J Psychiatry Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 5.744
Authors: Volker Tschuschke; Aureliano Crameri; Miriam Koehler; Jessica Berglar; Katharina Muth; Pia Staczan; Agnes Von Wyl; Peter Schulthess; Margit Koemeda-Lutz Journal: Psychother Res Date: 2014-04-01
Authors: S A Wonderlich; C B Peterson; R D Crosby; T L Smith; M H Klein; J E Mitchell; S J Crow Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: S Touyz; D Le Grange; H Lacey; P Hay; R Smith; S Maguire; B Bamford; K M Pike; R D Crosby Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2013-05-03 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Christopher G Fairburn; Suzanne Bailey-Straebler; Shawnee Basden; Helen A Doll; Rebecca Jones; Rebecca Murphy; Marianne E O'Connor; Zafra Cooper Journal: Behav Res Ther Date: 2015-04-22