Literature DB >> 34622932

Assessing Sex, Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation, Race, Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Mental Health Concerns in Tobacco Use Disorder Treatment Research: Measurement Challenges and Recommendations From a Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco Pre-conference Workshop.

Andrea H Weinberger1,2, Marc L Steinberg3, Sarah D Mills4,5, Sarah S Dermody6, Jaimee L Heffner7, Amanda Y Kong4, Raina D Pang8,9, Rachel L Rosen3,10.   

Abstract

This paper reports on topics discussed at a Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco pre-conference workshop at the 2019 annual Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco meeting. The goal of the pre-conference workshop was to help develop a shared understanding of the importance of several tobacco-related priority groups in tobacco use disorder (TUD) treatment research and to highlight challenges in measurement related to these groups. The workshop focused on persons with minoritized sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation identities; persons with minoritized racial and ethnic backgrounds; persons with lower socioeconomic status (SES); and persons with mental health concerns. In addition to experiencing commercial tobacco-related health disparities, these groups are also underrepresented in tobacco research, including TUD treatment studies. Importantly, there is wide variation in how and whether researchers are identifying variation within these priority groups. Best practices for measuring and reporting sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, SES, and mental health concerns in TUD treatment research are needed. This paper provides information about measurement challenges when including these groups in TUD treatment research and specific recommendations about how to measure these groups and assess potential disparities in outcomes. The goal of this paper is to encourage TUD treatment researchers to use measurement best practices in these priority groups in an effort to conduct meaningful and equity-promoting research. Increasing the inclusion and visibility of these groups in TUD treatment research will help to move the field forward in decreasing tobacco-related health disparities. Implications: Tobacco-related disparities exist for a number of priority groups including, among others, women, individuals with minoritized sexual and gender identities, individuals with minoritized racial and ethnic backgrounds, individuals with lower SES, and individuals with mental health concerns. Research on TUD treatments for many of these subgroups is lacking. Accurate assessment and consideration of these subgroups will provide needed information about efficacious and effective TUD treatments, about potential mediators and moderators, and for accurately describing study samples, all critical elements for reducing tobacco-related disparities, and improving diversity, equity, and inclusion in TUD treatment research.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34622932      PMCID: PMC8962699          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntab201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   5.825


  71 in total

Review 1.  Classification of race and ethnicity: implications for public health.

Authors:  Vickie M Mays; Ninez A Ponce; Donna L Washington; Susan D Cochran
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2002-10-23       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 2.  Community-based participatory research and smoking cessation interventions: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Jeannette O Andrews; Susan D Newman; Janie Heath; Lovoria B Williams; Martha S Tingen
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 1.208

Review 3.  Deconstructing race and ethnicity: implications for measurement of health outcomes.

Authors:  Jennifer J Manly
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  A literature review on prevalence of gender differences and intersections with other vulnerabilities to tobacco use in the United States, 2004-2014.

Authors:  Stephen T Higgins; Allison N Kurti; Ryan Redner; Thomas J White; Diann E Gaalema; Megan E Roberts; Nathan J Doogan; Jennifer W Tidey; Mollie E Miller; Cassandra A Stanton; Jack E Henningfield; Gary S Atwood
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke; Robert L Spitzer; Janet B W Williams; Patrick O Monahan; Bernd Löwe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Smoking and mental illness in the U.S. population.

Authors:  Philip H Smith; Carolyn M Mazure; Sherry A McKee
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Successful recruitment of minorities into clinical trials: The Kick It at Swope project.

Authors:  Kari Jo Harris; Jasjit S Ahluwalia; Delwyn Catley; Kolawole S Okuyemi; Matthew S Mayo; Ken Resnicow
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Naming Racism, not Race, as a Determinant of Tobacco-Related Health Disparities.

Authors:  Jennifer L Pearson; Andrew Waa; Kamran Siddiqi; Richard Edwards; Patricia Nez Henderson; Monica Webb Hooper
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  Ethnic disparities in prevalence and patterns of smoking and nicotine dependence in rural southwest China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Xu-Ming Wang; Chao Wu; Allison Rabkin Golden; Cai Le
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.