Ramiro Sánchez1, Elísabet Martín-Tornero2, Jesús Lozano3,4, Antonio Fernández1, Patricia Arroyo3, Félix Meléndez3, Daniel Martín-Vertedor1,4. 1. Technological Institute of Food and Agriculture CICYTEX-INTAEX. Junta of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain. 2. Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering, School of Agrarian Engineering, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain. 3. Industrial Engineering School, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain. 4. Research Institute of Agricultural Resources (INURA), Campus Universitario, Badajoz, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Olive oil continues to be the main destination for olives. The production of table olives is increasing. 'Californian-style' processes are among the most frequently employed to produce oxidized olives. Sensory evaluation requires the development of an instrumental detection method that can be used as an adjunct to traditional tasting panels. RESULTS: An electronic nose (E-nose) was used to classify two varieties of olives following exposure to different sterilization. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that both varieties had different volatile profiles. Sensory panel evaluations were similar for both. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) obtained from the E-nose was able to separate the two varieties and explained 82% of total variance. Moreover, volatile profiles correctly classified olives according to sterilization times recorded up to 121 °C . The only exception was at F0 ≥ 22 min, at which a plot of PCA outcomes failed to differentiate scores. E-nose data showed similar results to those produced from the volatile analysis when grouping samples were sterilized to F0 ≥ 18 min, at the same time distinguishing these samples from those subjected to less intense thermal treatments. A partial least squares (PLS) chemometric approach was evaluated for quantifying important olive quality parameters. With regards to validation parameters, R P 2 pertaining to perceived defect was 0.88, whilst R P 2 pertaining to overall assessment was 0.78. CONCLUSIONS: E-nose offers a fast, inexpensive and non-destructive method for discriminating between varieties and thermal treatments up to a point at which cooking defects are highly similar (from F0 = 18 onwards).
BACKGROUND: Olive oil continues to be the main destination for olives. The production of table olives is increasing. 'Californian-style' processes are among the most frequently employed to produce oxidized olives. Sensory evaluation requires the development of an instrumental detection method that can be used as an adjunct to traditional tasting panels. RESULTS: An electronic nose (E-nose) was used to classify two varieties of olives following exposure to different sterilization. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that both varieties had different volatile profiles. Sensory panel evaluations were similar for both. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) obtained from the E-nose was able to separate the two varieties and explained 82% of total variance. Moreover, volatile profiles correctly classified olives according to sterilization times recorded up to 121 °C . The only exception was at F0 ≥ 22 min, at which a plot of PCA outcomes failed to differentiate scores. E-nose data showed similar results to those produced from the volatile analysis when grouping samples were sterilized to F0 ≥ 18 min, at the same time distinguishing these samples from those subjected to less intense thermal treatments. A partial least squares (PLS) chemometric approach was evaluated for quantifying important olive quality parameters. With regards to validation parameters, R P 2 pertaining to perceived defect was 0.88, whilst R P 2 pertaining to overall assessment was 0.78. CONCLUSIONS: E-nose offers a fast, inexpensive and non-destructive method for discriminating between varieties and thermal treatments up to a point at which cooking defects are highly similar (from F0 = 18 onwards).