Literature DB >> 34622357

Effect of co-positivity for brucellosis and tuberculosis on milk yield and fertility of Holstein cows.

M Mellado1, N Treviño1, F G Véliz2, U Macías-Cruz3, L Avendaño-Reyes3, A de Santiago2, J E García4.   

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether cows detected as tuberculosis (bTB) reactors and seropositive to brucellosis (bBR), as well as co-positive to bBR and bTB (bBR-bTB) and with a complete lactation before slaughter, were associated with reduced milk production and fertility. A total of 8068 productive and reproductive records of high-yielding Holstein cows from a single large dairy herd with a high prevalence of bTB and bBR were collected from 2012 to 2015. Lactation derived either from calving (n = 6019) or hormonally induced lactation (n = 2049), and all cows received growth hormone throughout lactation. For cows not induced into lactation, pregnancy rate to first service for healthy cows (C; 26.6%) was higher (P < 0.01) than bBR (15.2%), bTB (15.8%), and bBR-bTB (1.3%) cows. For induced cows, pregnancy rate to first service did not differ significantly among C, bBR, and bTB (14.5-17.3%) cows, but the percentage success of first service was extremely low (1.3%; P < 0.01) in bBR-bTB cows. Services per pregnancy (only pregnant cows) were lowest for C (3.3 ± 2.9; P < 0.01) and highest (6.4 ± 3.4) for bBR-bTB non-induced cows. This variable was lowest for C (2.9 ± 2.5; P < 0.01) and highest for bBR-bTB non-induced cows (6.3 ± 3.1). Pregnancy rate to all services did not differed for C (79.5%), bBR (76.7%), and bTB (75.9%) but was lower (58.9%; P < 0.01) for bBR-bTB non-induced cows. For induced cows this variable was highest for bBR (53.3%) and lowest for bBR-bTB (34.1%; P < 0.01) non-induced cows. 305-d milk production was increased by 4%, and total milk yield by 7% in TB-positive cows compared to that of the negative cows non-induced hormonally into lactation. This study showed the negative impact of the co-positivity for bTB and bBR on the reproductive efficiency of Holstein cows, although positive bTB and bBR tests enhanced milk yield.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion rate; Bovine brucellosis; Bovine tuberculosis; Pregnancy rate; Services per pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34622357     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-021-02952-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  3 in total

1.  Descriptive study of human and bovine tuberculosis in Querétaro, México.

Authors:  F Milián; L M Sánchez; P Toledo; C Ramírez; M A Santillán
Journal:  Rev Latinoam Microbiol       Date:  2000 Jan-Mar

2.  Immune Response of Calves Vaccinated with Brucella abortus S19 or RB51 and Revaccinated with RB51.

Authors:  Elaine M S Dorneles; Graciela K Lima; Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho; Márcio S S Araújo; Olindo A Martins-Filho; Nammalwar Sriranganathan; Hamzeh Al Qublan; Marcos B Heinemann; Andrey P Lage
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Zoonotic tuberculosis in human beings caused by Mycobacterium bovis-a call for action.

Authors:  Francisco Olea-Popelka; Adrian Muwonge; Alejandro Perera; Anna S Dean; Elizabeth Mumford; Elisabeth Erlacher-Vindel; Simona Forcella; Benjamin J Silk; Lucica Ditiu; Ahmed El Idrissi; Mario Raviglione; Ottorino Cosivi; Philip LoBue; Paula I Fujiwara
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 25.071

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.