| Literature DB >> 34622224 |
Felix Paolo J Lizarondo1, Mia Katrina R Gervasio1, Charmaine Vanessa S Chamberlin1, Charissa Mia S Gnilo1, Claudine Y Silva1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) has been postulated to be an autoimmune disease affecting the hair follicles. Because vitamin D receptors are present in the immune system and hair follicles, vitamin D has been hypothesized to affect the disease.Entities:
Keywords: AA, alopecia areata; Philippines; SALT, severity of alopecia tool; alopecia areata; cross-sectional; serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D; vitamin D; vitamin D deficiency; vitamin D levels
Year: 2021 PMID: 34622224 PMCID: PMC8484040 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdin.2021.07.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JAAD Int ISSN: 2666-3287
Baseline characteristics of alopecia areata patients and healthy controls∗
| Epidemiologic factors | Alopecia areata patients | Healthy controls | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 31.48 ± 10.82 | 31.86 ± 10.51 | .89 |
| Age range | 19-65 | 19-64 | |
| Sex | Males: 10 | Males: 10 | 1 |
| Average time of sun exposure per wk | <30 min: 16 | <30 min: 16 | 1 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 23.41 | 24.07 | .30 |
| Skin phototype | III: 5 | III: 3 | .48 |
| Photoprotection practices | Present: 21 | Present: 13 | .06 |
The patients were matched based on age, sex, and sun exposure per day. The other noted factors included body mass index, skin phototype, and photoprotection practices apart from sunscreen use.
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in alopecia areata patients and healthy controls
| Alopecia areata patients | Healthy controls | |
|---|---|---|
| 24.41 ± 6.87 | 24.68 ± 6.68 | .88 |
Percentage of Vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL), insufficiency (21-29 ng/mL), and sufficiency (30-100 ng/mL) in alopecia areata patients and healthy controls
| Vitamin D status | Alopecia areata patients | Healthy controls | Fisher's exact test |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency | 34.48% (10/29) | 17.24% (5/29) | .42 |
| Insufficiency | 44.83% (13/29) | 58.62% (17/29) | |
| Sufficiency | 20.69% (6/29) | 24.14% (7/29) |
Characteristics of alopecia areata patients and corresponding mean vitamin D levels
| AA parameter | Number of AA patients | Mean vitamin D level ± SD (ng/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical type | Patchy | 25 | 24.69 ± 7.22 |
| Ophiasis | 2 | 22.6 ± 6.9 | |
| Totalis | 1 | 20.92 | |
| Universalis | 1 | 24.68 | |
| SALT score | S1 | 20 | 25.95 ± 6.80 |
| S2 | 5 | 21.02 ± 7.82 | |
| S3 | 2 | 19.14 ± 5.18 | |
| S4 | 2 | 22.8 ± 2.66 | |
| Disease activity | Active | 28 | 24.67 ± 6.85 |
| Inactive | 1 | 17.12 | |
| Duration of current episode of hair loss | <3 mo | 13 | 24.05 ± 6.12 |
| 3-12 mo | 11 | 24.74 ± 7.70 | |
| 12-24 mo | 3 | 27.56 ± 10.25 | |
| 2-5 y | 1 | 19.52 | |
| >5 y | 1 | 20.92 | |
SALT, Severity of alopecia tool.
Fig 1Scatter plots of vitamin D levels seen in various clinical parameters noted in AA patients. A, There was no correlation seen between the different clinical types of AA and vitamin D levels, with an rs of −0.0875 (P = .65). B, There was a weakly negative correlation between SALT score and vitamin D levels, with an rs of −0.3277 (P = .09). C, There was no correlation seen between AA duration and vitamin D levels, with an rs of −0.0511 (P = .79). AA, Alopecia areata; r, Spearman correlation coefficient; SALT, severity of alopecia tool.
Epidemiologic characteristics of alopecia areata patients and corresponding mean vitamin D levels
| Epidemiologic factors | Number of AA patients | Mean vitamin D level ± SD (ng/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 29 | See note | |
| Sex | Male | 10 | 27.81 ± 8.35 |
| Female | 19 | 22.63 ± 5.37 | |
| Body mass index | 29 | See note | |
| Sun exposure | <30 min per d | 16 | 22.13 ± 5.64 |
| ≥ 30 min per d | 13 | 27.22 ± 7.40 | |
| Skin phototype | III | 3 | 23.35 ± 4.10 |
| IV | 24 | 24.62 ± 7.02 | |
| V | 2 | 31.59 ± 1.15 | |
| Photoprotection practices (apart from sunscreen use) | Present (umbrella, caps or hats, and clothing) | 22 | 24.98 ± 7.34 |
| Absent | 7 | 22.61 ± 5.17 | |
AA, Alopecia areata; BMI, body mass index.
The stratification of age and BMI into groups was not done because both were continuous variables. Hence, the mean vitamin D level is the same as that of AA patient group. The correlation of age and BMI with vitamin D level was analyzed using the Pearson correlation.
Fig 2Scatter and box plots of vitamin D levels seen for the various epidemiologic parameters noted in AA patients. A, There was a moderately positive correlation between age and vitamin D levels, with an r of 0.4922 (P = .007). B, The vitamin D levels in females were borderline significantly lower than those in males (P = .05). C, There was a very weak negative correlation between BMI and vitamin D levels, with an r of −0.1743 (P = .37). D, The vitamin D levels in AA patients who had <30 minutes of sun exposure per day were significantly lower than those of AA patients who had ≥30 minutes per day (P = .04). E, There was a weakly positive correlation between skin phototype and vitamin D levels, with an rs of 0.3166 (P = .09). F, The vitamin D levels of AA patients who had practiced photoprotection measures apart from sunscreen use were not different from those of AA patients who did not practice any form of photoprotection. AA, Alopecia areata; BMI, body mass index; r, Pearson correlation coefficient; r, Spearman correlation coefficient.