Literature DB >> 34621051

Rapid neural reorganization during retrieval practice predicts subsequent long-term retention and false memory.

Liping Zhuang1,2, Jingyi Wang1,2, Bingsen Xiong1,2, Cheng Bian1,2, Lei Hao1,2,3, Peter J Bayley4,5, Shaozheng Qin6,7,8.   

Abstract

Active retrieval can alter the strength and content of a memory, yielding either enhanced or distorted subsequent recall. However, how consolidation influences these retrieval-induced seemingly contradictory outcomes remains unknown. Here we show that rapid neural reorganization over an eight-run retrieval practice predicted subsequent recall. Retrieval practice boosted memory retention following a 24-hour (long-term) but not 30-minute delay, and increased false memory at both delays. Long-term retention gains were predicted by multi-voxel representation distinctiveness in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) that increased progressively over retrieval practice. False memory was predicted by unstable representation distinctiveness in the medial temporal lobe (MTL). Retrieval practice enhanced the efficiency of memory-related brain networks, through building up PPC and MTL connections with the ventrolateral and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex that predicted long-term retention gains and false memory, respectively. Our findings indicate that retrieval-induced rapid neural reorganization together with consecutive consolidation fosters long-term retention and false memories via distinct pathways.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34621051     DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01188-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Hum Behav        ISSN: 2397-3374


  49 in total

Review 1.  Memory traces revisited.

Authors:  L Nadel; C Land
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Andrew C Butler
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  The critical importance of retrieval for learning.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Karpicke; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Neural Differentiation Tracks Improved Recall of Competing Memories Following Interleaved Study and Retrieval Practice.

Authors:  J C Hulbert; K A Norman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 5.  The role of engram cells in the systems consolidation of memory.

Authors:  Susumu Tonegawa; Mark D Morrissey; Takashi Kitamura
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Retrieval as a Fast Route to Memory Consolidation.

Authors:  James W Antony; Catarina S Ferreira; Kenneth A Norman; Maria Wimber
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Testing enhances subsequent learning in older adults.

Authors:  Bernhard Pastötter; Karl-Heinz T Bäuml
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2018-10-18

8.  Competitive Trace Theory: A Role for the Hippocampus in Contextual Interference during Retrieval.

Authors:  Michael A Yassa; Zachariah M Reagh
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Retrieval induces adaptive forgetting of competing memories via cortical pattern suppression.

Authors:  Maria Wimber; Arjen Alink; Ian Charest; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Neurogenesis-mediated forgetting minimizes proactive interference.

Authors:  Jonathan R Epp; Rudy Silva Mera; Stefan Köhler; Sheena A Josselyn; Paul W Frankland
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.