Hanadi Rafii1,2, Irina Ionescu3, Annalisa Ruggeri4,5, Federico Garnier3, Caroline Ballot6, Danièle Bensoussan7, Christian Chabannon8, Bernard Dazey9, John De Vos10, Eric Gautier11, Christine Giraud12, Jérome Larghero13, Audrey Cras13, Valérie Mialou14, Virginie Persoons15, Fabienne Pouthier16, Jean-Baptiste Thibert17, Jean-Hugues Dalle18, Gerard Michel19, Mahamadou Sinayoko3, Chantal Kenzey4,20, Fernanda Volt4,20, Vanderson Rocha4,21, Jacques-Olivier Bay22, Marie-Thérèse Rubio23, Marie Robin24, Catherine Faucher3, Evelyne Marry3, Eliane Gluckman4,20. 1. Eurocord, Hopital Saint Louis APHP, Institut de Recherche de Saint-Louis (IRSL) EA3518, Université de Paris, Paris, France. hanadi.rafii-elayoubi@aphp.fr. 2. Monacord, International Observatory on Sickle Cell Disease, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, Monaco, Monaco. hanadi.rafii-elayoubi@aphp.fr. 3. Agency of Biomedecine, La Plaine, Saint-Denis, France. 4. Eurocord, Hopital Saint Louis APHP, Institut de Recherche de Saint-Louis (IRSL) EA3518, Université de Paris, Paris, France. 5. Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. 6. Laboratoire de Thérapie Cellulaire, Etablissement Français du Sang Hauts de France Normandie, site de LILLE - Belfort, Lille, France. 7. Tissue Engineering and Cell Therapy unit, Regional University hospital, Nancy, France. 8. Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Departement of Cancer Biology, Inserm CBT1409, Marseille, France. 9. Cell Therapy unit, Etablissement Français du Sang, Bordeaux, France. 10. Cell Therapy unit, University hospital, Montpellier, France. 11. Cell Therapy unit, Etablissement Français du Sang, Créteil, France. 12. Department of Hematology and Cell Therapy, Etablissement Français du Sang, University hospital, Poitiers, France. 13. Cell Therapy Unit and Cord Blood Bank, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Louis, 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, F-75010, Paris, France. 14. Cell Therapy unit, Etablissement Français du Sang, hopital E. Herriot, Lyon, France. 15. Cell Therapy and Tissue Engineering unit, Etablissement Français du Sang, Grenoble, France. 16. Cell and Tissue Engineering unit, Etablissement Francais du Sang, Besançon, France. 17. Cell Therapy unit, Etablissement Français du Sang, Rennes, France. 18. Hopital Robert Debré, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. 19. Aix-Marseille University and La Timone Children's Hospital, Marseille, France. 20. Monacord, International Observatory on Sickle Cell Disease, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, Monaco, Monaco. 21. Department of Hematology, Clinics Hospital, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil. 22. Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Clermont University, Clermont-Ferrand, France. 23. Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, regional university hospital, Nancy, France. 24. Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Louis, 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, Paris, France.
The emergence of COVID-19 as a pandemic in early 2020 has impacted different aspects of stem cell transplant practice around the world. Transplant physicians were forced to face major challenges to maintain access to urgent transplants [1-5].National lockdown, international frontiers closing, flight and train circulation restrictions, internationaly as well as within France, were established to control COVID-19 spread, making more challenging stem cells procurement from international and national donors. In addition, transplant teams had to tackle unpredicted situations related to donor and harvest staff exposure to the virus, which were likely to have an impact in stem cell clearance for donation.Due to the emergence of COVID-19, the World Marrow Donor Association (WMDA) [6], the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) [7, 8] and all national and international registries published recommendations to maintain safe access to urgent hematopoietic stem cell transplants [9-11]. They recommended to cryopreserve all grafts and give preference to domestic donors and cord blood over international ones.This study aims to retrospectively review the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the collection and utilization of unrelated umbilical cord blood units (UCB) facilitated by the French Cord Blood Banks (CBB) Network during 2020 in comparison to 2019.From January to December 2020, 4392 UCB were collected by the French CBB Network, compared to 7989 units in 2019; there was a 45% decrease in the collection activity in 2020. The impact was most prominent during the 2-month lockdown period in France (March 17th through May 10th, 2020) when UCB harvesting activity was totally stopped (Fig. 1a).
Fig. 1
Numbers of UCB units in 2020 and 2019.
(a) UCB collected (b) UCB released for international recipients (c) UCB released for national recipients.
Numbers of UCB units in 2020 and 2019.
(a) UCB collected (b) UCB released for international recipients (c) UCB released for national recipients.A total of 154 UCB units were facilitated by the French CBB Network in 2020 to transplant both national (96 units) and international recipients (58 units). No significant difference in indications for UCB transplantation (UCBT) was observed between national and international patients. Median age at UCBT was 31.8 years (0.2–70) and was lower for national recipients (median of 14.3 years) compared to international ones (median of 44.8 years). Fifty-five national recipients and 49 international recipients of UCBT were children (<18 years). Fifty-eight units provided by international CBB were imported to transplant national recipients and 58 units provided by French CBB Network were exported for international patients. Most countries involved in UCB exchange activity with the French CBB Network in 2020 were in Europe (44%) and USA (36%). There was 24% decrease in unit exchange with the American CBB (42 units in 2020 vs. 55 in 2019) but we did not observe an impact on the global exchange activity in Europe (51 units both in 2020 and 2019).Release activity from the French CBB Network inventory involved a total 96 units in 2020 (vs 105 in 2019). Fifty-eight units (60%) were released to transplant international recipients with a 21% reduction compared to the previous year (58 in 2020 vs 73 units in 2019) due to international borders closures that severely impacted the export of stem cell products to recipients outside of France (Fig. 1b). Thirty-eight units (40%) were used to transplant national recipients (Fig. 1c) which corresponds to a 19% increase in utilization of domestic UCB units by French transplant centers in 2020 (38 units vs 32 units in 2019). However, there was a 50% increase in global UCB release activity (39 units vs 26 in 2019) between March and May 2020, coinciding with the COVID-19 lockdown period in several countries, with high number of units released by the French CBB Network for both international (23 vs 18 in 2019) and national (16 vs 8 in 2019) recipients (Fig. 1b, c).Import activity was not affected and involved 58 units that were imported in 2020 from international CBB to transplant national recipients (58 in 2019). Most (95%) units were imported from countries in Europe (37 units in 2020 vs 27 in 2019), USA (14 units in 2020 vs 24 in 2019) and UK (4 units in 2020 and 2019). However, there was a 37% increase in UCB units imported from Europe in 2020 and 42% decrease in units imported from USA.Overall, the utilization rate of UCB for recipients in France increased 7% in 2020 (96 vs 90 units in 2019). Fifty-eight units (60%) were provided by international CBB and 38 (40%) were provided by the French CBB Network. Indications for UCBT were acute leukemia in majority (>60%) of cases (71 AML and 31 ALL in 2020 vs 68 AML and 34 ALL in 2019). Other indications included myelodysplastic syndrome (13 vs 21 in 2019), lymphoproliferative disorders (5 vs 9 in 2019), severe aplastic anemia (16 vs 11 in 2019), primary immunodeficiency (8 vs 9 in 2019) and metabolic disorders (6 as in 2019).There was no statistically significant difference in cell doses of the UCB used for transplantation (collected TNC x107/kg of 4.3 in 2020 vs 5.9 in 2019, p = 0.44).Of the 1429 requests issued in 2020 for harvesting unrelated donor (bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell) grafts, 392 were canceled resulting in a cancellation rate of 26% of the harvesting requests issued in 2020 compared to 28% (405/1454) of those issued in 2019. The donor-related causes represented 46% of the reasons for cancellation in 2020 and 54% of those in 2019. However, we do not have the information if the cancellation was directly related to COVID 19.Finally, of the 170 adult donor transplants unexpectedly canceled for donor-related causes in 2020, 13 (8%) transplants were performed using UCB as stem cell source (in comparison to 9 UCBT (4%) of the 222 adult donor transplants unexpectedly canceled in 2019).The use of UCB for transplantation decreased worldwide in recent years with the development of haploidentical transplants. However, UCB remains a valuable stem cell source especially for ethnic minorities. UCB is a major resource during emergency situations (nuclear accidents, epidemics..) impacting the collection of blood and marrow as the units are typed, cryopreseved and ready for immediate use. UCB proved to be of critical importance during the current Covid-19 pandemic, mainly in its early phase due to strict lockdown in many countries, international border closures and uncertainty related to COVID-19-delays in adult donor cell procurement. Having UCB readily available in the CBB allowed to bypass the complexity of stem cell procurement process and helped to transplant urgent patients rapidly and with safe products that had not been exposed to SARS-CoV-2. Also important, the use of UCB is an attractive solution for skipping the adult donor work-up and collection which implicates hospital visits, consequently, increasing the potential for donor exposure to viral contamination. Moreover, hospital access is usually very restricted in times of sanitary crisis like the one we are currently experiencing with SARS-CoV-2.UCB allowed to maintain the transplant activity in France and avoid delaying urgent transplants during the pandemic. The impact was more prominent at the domestic level probably due to easier logistic for their national use. Simpler processes associated with unit procurement together with rapid unit availability and product safety may explain why the release of UCB was not slowed by the pandemic, with roughly similar number of units released by the French CBB Network in 2020 and 2019.The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic highlighted the added value of this alternative graft source in emergency situations. Our study supports the importance of maintaining cord blood banks, preserving the UCB inventories and maximizing the collection of high quality cord blood units.
Authors: Per Ljungman; Malgorzata Mikulska; Rafael de la Camara; Grzegorz W Basak; Christian Chabannon; Selim Corbacioglu; Rafael Duarte; Harry Dolstra; Arjan C Lankester; Mohamad Mohty; Silvia Montoto; John Murray; Régis Peffault de Latour; John A Snowden; Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha; Bregje Verhoeven; Nicolaus Kröger; Jan Styczynski Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Ghada Algwaiz; Mahmoud Aljurf; Mickey Koh; Mary M Horowitz; Per Ljungman; Daniel Weisdorf; Wael Saber; Yoshihisa Kodera; Jeff Szer; Dunia Jawdat; William A Wood; Ruta Brazauskas; Leslie Lehmann; Marcelo C Pasquini; Adriana Seber; Pei Hua Lu; Yoshiko Atsuta; Marcie Riches; Miguel-Angel Perales; Nina Worel; Shinichiro Okamoto; Alok Srivastava; Roy F Chemaly; Catherine Cordonnier; Christopher E Dandoy; John R Wingard; Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja; Mehdi Hamadani; Navneet S Majhail; Alpana A Waghmare; Nelson Chao; Nicolaus Kröger; Bronwen Shaw; Mohamad Mohty; Dietger Niederwieser; Hildegard Greinix; Shahrukh K Hashmi Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2020-07-24 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: David S Allan; Meagan Green; Gail Morris; Jason Weiss; Nicholas Dibdin; Dena Mercer; Matthew Seftel Journal: Vox Sang Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 2.996