| Literature DB >> 34620941 |
Thanongsak Chaiyaso1,2, Pornchai Rachtanapun1,2,3, Nanthicha Thajai4, Krittameth Kiattipornpithak1, Pensak Jantrawut5, Warintorn Ruksiriwanich5, Phisit Seesuriyachan1,2,3, Noppol Leksawasdi1,2,3, Yuthana Phimolsiripol1,2,3, Charin Techapun1, Sarana Rose Sommano2,6, Toshiaki Ougizawa7, Kamon Yakul1, Kittisak Jantanasakulwong8,9,10.
Abstract
Cassava starch was blended with glycerol to prepare thermoplastic starch (TPS). Thermoplastic starch was premixed with sericin (TPSS) by solution mixing and then melt-blended with polyethylene grafted maleic anhydride (PEMAH). The effect of sericin on the mechanical properties, morphology, thermal properties, rheology, and reaction mechanism was investigated. The tensile strength and elongation at break of the TPSS10/PEMAH blend were improved to 12.2 MPa and 100.4%, respectively. The TPS/PEMAH morphology presented polyethylene grafted maleic anhydride particles (2 μm) dispersed in the thermoplastic starch matrix, which decreased in size to approximately 200 nm when 5% sericin was used. The melting temperature of polyethylene grafted maleic anhydride (121 °C) decreased to 111 °C because of the small crystal size of the polyethylene grafted maleic anhydride phase. The viscosity of TPS/PEMAH increased with increasing sericin content because of the chain extension. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy confirmed the reaction between the amino groups of sericin and the maleic anhydride groups of polyethylene grafted maleic anhydride. This reaction reduced the interfacial tension between thermoplastic starch and polyethylene grafted maleic anhydride, which improved the compatibility, mechanical properties, and morphology of the blend.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34620941 PMCID: PMC8497493 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99417-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic model of the TPSS/PEMAH blend through reaction mechanism of sericin/PEMAH.
Figure 2Tensile properties of thermoplastic starch (TPS) and TPS with sericin (TPSS) blending with polyethylene grafted maleic anhydride (PEMAH) (a) stress–strain curve and (b) maximum tensile strength and elongation at break (n = 5). Means with different lowercase letters of maximum tensile strength and uppercase letters of elongation at break are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Figure 3Scanning electron micrographs of (a) TPS/PEMAH, (b) TPSS1/PEMAH, (c) TPSS2.5/PEMAH, (d) TPSS5/PEMAH, and (e) TPSS10/PEMAH.
Figure 4Water contact angle at 3 min of the thermoplastic starch (TPS), TPS with sericin (TPSS) 1–10 phr blending with polyethylene grafted maleic anhydride (PEMAH).
Figure 5Differential scanning calorimetry curves (2nd scan) of thermoplastic starch (TPS), TPS with sericin (TPSS), and TPSS 1–10 phr blending with polyethylene grafted maleic anhydride (PEMAH).
Figure 6Melt-viscosity of TPS and TPSS 1–10 phr blending with polyethylene grafted maleic anhydride (PEMAH) at 160 °C.
Figure 7Fourier transform infrared spectra of sericin, thermoplastic starch (TPS), TPS with sericin (TPSS), polyethylene grafted maleic anhydride (PEMAH), TPS/PEMAH, and TPSS/PEMAH.
Figure 8Suggested reactions and interactions (a) interaction of cassava starch/sericin and cassava starch/glycerol, (b) TPS/PEMAH reaction, and (c) TPSS/PEMAH reaction.
Composition and codes of thermoplastic starch (TPS) and thermoplastic starch with sericin blending with polyethylene grafted maleic anhydride (PEMAH).
| Samples | Composition | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| TPS | PEMAH | Sericin | |
| TPS | 80 | – | – |
| TPS/PEMAH | 80 | 20 | – |
| TPSS1/PEMAH | 80 | 20 | 1 |
| TPSS2.5/PEMAH | 80 | 20 | 2.5 |
| TPSS5/PEMAH | 80 | 20 | 5 |
| TPSS10/PEMAH | 80 | 20 | 10 |