Literature DB >> 34619719

Outcomes in Twins Compared With Singletons Subsequent to Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes.

Michal Fishel Bartal1, Lynda G Ugwu, William A Grobman, Jennifer L Bailit, Uma M Reddy, Ronald J Wapner, Michael W Varner, John M Thorp, Steve N Caritis, Mona Prasad, Alan T N Tita, George R Saade, Dwight J Rouse.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes after preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) from 23 to 34 weeks of gestation in twin compared with singleton gestations.
METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of an obstetric cohort of 115,502 individuals and their singleton or twin neonates born in 25 hospitals nationwide (2008-2011). Those with preterm PROM from 23 0/7 through 33 6/7 weeks of gestation were included; neonates with major fetal anomalies were excluded. The coprimary outcomes for this analysis were composite maternal morbidity (chorioamnionitis, blood transfusion, postpartum endometritis, wound infection, sepsis, venous thromboembolism, intensive care unit admission, or death) and composite major neonatal morbidity (persistent pulmonary hypertension, intraventricular hemorrhage grade III or IV, seizures, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, necrotizing enterocolitis stage II or III, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, stillbirth subsequent to admission, or neonatal death before discharge). Logistic regression was used to estimate unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs for twin compared with singleton gestations.
RESULTS: Of 1,531 (1.3%) individuals who met eligibility criteria for this analysis, 218 (14.2%) had twin gestations. The median gestational age at preterm PROM was similar between those with twins and singletons (31.2 weeks [interquartile range 27.4-32.9] vs 30.6 weeks [interquartile range 26.9-32.7], P=.23); however, those with twin gestations had a shorter median latency period (2.0 days [interquartile range 1.0-5.0] vs 3.0 days [interquartile range 2.0-8.0], P<.001). After adjustment for potential confounders, odds of experiencing composite maternal morbidity (17.9% vs 19.3%, adjusted OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.66-1.42) or composite neonatal morbidity (20.4% vs 20.5%, OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.72-1.31) did not differ between groups.
CONCLUSION: In a large, diverse cohort, the likelihood of composite maternal or neonatal morbidity per fetus after preterm PROM was similar for twin and singleton gestations.
Copyright © 2021 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34619719      PMCID: PMC8542618          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  19 in total

1.  Twin versus singleton pregnancy and preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes.

Authors:  Y Jacquemyn; L Noelmans; L Mahieu; Ph Buytaert
Journal:  Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.146

2.  Outcomes of preterm premature rupture of membranes in twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Stephanie V Trentacoste; Claudel Jean-Pierre; Rebecca Baergen; Stephen T Chasen
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2008-08

3.  The clinical outcome of preterm premature rupture of membranes in twin versus singleton pregnancies.

Authors:  A T Bianco; J Stone; R Lapinski; C Lockwood; L Lynch; R L Berkowitz
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Determinants of the competing outcomes of intrauterine infection, abruption, or spontaneous preterm birth after preterm premature rupture of membranes.

Authors:  David N Hackney; Kelly Kuo; Rebecca J Petersen; Justin R Lappen
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2015-01-07

5.  Can differences in obstetric outcomes be explained by differences in the care provided? The MFMU Network APEX study.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Jennifer L Bailit; Madeline Murguia Rice; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Jay D Iams; Alan T Tita; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Jorge E Tolosa; J Peter Van Dorsten
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Preterm premature rupture of membranes in singleton vs twin pregnancies: The latency periods and the clinical outcomes revisited.

Authors:  S Esin; A Gyimadu; Z Atak; O Özyüncü; O Deren; L Onderoglu; T Durukan
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  The natural history of preterm premature rupture of membranes in twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Mia Kibel; Jon Barrett; Carly Tward; Alex Pittini; Michael Kahn; Nir Melamed
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2016-09-02

8.  Whole-body hypothermia for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Seetha Shankaran; Abbot R Laptook; Richard A Ehrenkranz; Jon E Tyson; Scott A McDonald; Edward F Donovan; Avroy A Fanaroff; W Kenneth Poole; Linda L Wright; Rosemary D Higgins; Neil N Finer; Waldemar A Carlo; Shahnaz Duara; William Oh; C Michael Cotten; David K Stevenson; Barbara J Stoll; James A Lemons; Ronnie Guillet; Alan H Jobe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Clinical characteristics and outcome of twin gestation complicated by preterm premature rupture of the membranes.

Authors:  B M Mercer; L G Crocker; W F Pierce; B M Sibai
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth.

Authors:  Robert L Goldenberg; Jennifer F Culhane; Jay D Iams; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-01-05       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.