Literature DB >> 34619446

Participants of a mail delivery syringe services program are underserved by other safe sources for sterile injection supplies.

Benjamin T Hayes1, Jamie Favaro2, Dan Coello2, Czarina N Behrends3, Andrea Jakubowski4, Aaron D Fox4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the United States, accessing sterile injection supplies remains challenging for many people who inject drugs (PWID). Although women are less likely to inject drugs than men, women who do inject are disproportionately affected by IDU-related complications. Needle Exchange Technology (NEXT), the first formal online accessed mail delivery syringe services program (SSP) in the US, may overcome access barriers. We evaluated whether NEXT was reaching women participants and people without access to other safe sources of sterile injection supplies.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study examined NEXT participants who enrolled in the mail-delivery SSP from February 2018 through March 2021. All NEXT participants completed an online questionnaire during enrollment, which included sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and injection-related risk factors (including prior sources of sterile injection supplies). Multivariable logistic regression (MVR) was used to examine associations between gender and prior use of safe sources of injection supplies (i.e., SSPs or pharmacies).
RESULTS: 1,032 participants received injection supplies. Median age was 34 and participants were mostly cis-gendered women (55%) and white (93%). 34% reported infection with HCV; women were more likely to report HCV infection than men (38% vs 28%; p < 0.01). 68% of participants acquired injection supplies from less safe sources. Few participants exclusively used safe sources for injection supplies (26%). In adjusted MVR analysis, women participants had significantly lower odds than men of having exclusively used safe sources for injection supplies (adjusted OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52, 0.98).
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that NEXT services are utilized by women and people without prior access to sterile injection supplies. Women participants were less likely than men to have exclusively used safe sources for sterile injection supplies. Future research should explore women's preference for mail-delivery over in-person SSPs and determine whether online accessed mail delivery services can reach other underserved populations of PWID.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Harm reduction; Mail delivery; Syringe services program; Women

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34619446      PMCID: PMC8755579          DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Drug Policy        ISSN: 0955-3959


  44 in total

1.  The damage done: a study of injection drug use, injection related abscesses and needle exchange regulation.

Authors:  Christina M Tomolillo; Linda J Crothers; Christopher L Aberson
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.164

2.  The Everyday Violence of Hepatitis C Among Young Women Who Inject Drugs in San Francisco.

Authors:  Philippe Bourgois; Bridget Prince; Andrew Moss
Journal:  Hum Organ       Date:  2004-09

3.  The roles of law, client race and program visibility in shaping police interference with the operation of US syringe exchange programs.

Authors:  Leo Beletsky; Lauretta E Grau; Edward White; Sarah Bowman; Robert Heimer
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Nationwide increase in hospitalizations for heroin-related soft tissue infections: Associations with structural market conditions.

Authors:  Daniel Ciccarone; George Jay Unick; Jenny K Cohen; Sarah G Mars; Daniel Rosenblum
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Exchange Sex and HIV Infection Among Women Who Inject Drugs-20 US Cities, 2009.

Authors:  Lina M Nerlander; Kristen L Hess; Charles E Rose; Catlainn Sionean; Anna Thorson; Dita Broz; Gabriela Paz-Bailey
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.731

6.  Nonprescription syringe sales: a missed opportunity for HIV prevention in California.

Authors:  Robin A Pollini; Abby E Rudolph; Patricia Case
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

7.  HIV Infection Linked to Injection Use of Oxymorphone in Indiana, 2014-2015.

Authors:  Philip J Peters; Pamela Pontones; Karen W Hoover; Monita R Patel; Romeo R Galang; Jessica Shields; Sara J Blosser; Michael W Spiller; Brittany Combs; William M Switzer; Caitlin Conrad; Jessica Gentry; Yury Khudyakov; Dorothy Waterhouse; S Michele Owen; Erika Chapman; Jeremy C Roseberry; Veronica McCants; Paul J Weidle; Dita Broz; Taraz Samandari; Jonathan Mermin; Jennifer Walthall; John T Brooks; Joan M Duwve
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Estimating HIV prevalence and risk behaviors of transgender persons in the United States: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Herbst; Elizabeth D Jacobs; Teresa J Finlayson; Vel S McKleroy; Mary Spink Neumann; Nicole Crepaz
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2007-08-13

9.  Increasing Infectious Endocarditis Admissions Among Young People Who Inject Drugs.

Authors:  Alysse G Wurcel; Jordan E Anderson; Kenneth K H Chui; Sally Skinner; Tamsin A Knox; David R Snydman; Thomas J Stopka
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.835

10.  Harm Reduction, By Mail: the Next Step in Promoting the Health of People Who Use Drugs.

Authors:  Benjamin T Hayes; Jamie Favaro; Corey S Davis; Gregg S Gonsalves; Leo Beletsky; David Vlahov; Robert Heimer; Aaron D Fox
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 5.801

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.