James Tod Olin1, Monica Shaffer2, Emily Nauman2, Catherine S Durso3, Elizabeth M Fan4, Herman Staudenmayer5, Kent L Christopher6, Jackie Gartner-Schmidt7. 1. Department of Pediatrics, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo; Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo. Electronic address: olint@njhealth.org. 2. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo. 3. Department of Computer Science, University of Denver, Denver, Colo. 4. Department of Pediatrics, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo. 5. Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo. 6. Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo. 7. Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) causes exertional dyspnea and is important for its effect on quality of life, diagnostic confusion with exercise-induced asthma, and health care resource utilization. There is no validated patient-reported outcome measure specific to EILO. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop, validate, and define a minimal clinically important difference for a patient-reported outcome measure to be used with adolescents and young adults with EILO. METHODS: A multidisciplinary group created a preliminary measure, modified by a 10-member participant focus group, with 20 items scored along a 5-point Likert scale. A subsequent cohort of participants recruited from a clinic, aged 12 to 21 years, with confirmed EILO by continuous laryngoscopy during exercise testing (1) completed the measure at 3 points in time over 28 days and (2) provided anchoring data in the form of a daily exercise log and categorical self-assessments of clinical improvement. Thirty additional participants without exertional dyspnea served as controls. RESULTS: Two hundred nineteen subjects with mild to severe EILO participated in the exploratory factor analysis, which identified 7 factors within the preliminary outcome measure. After a process of item reduction, a 12-item metric with a total score ranging from 0 to 48 was developed. Mean scores of patients with EILO and healthy controls at baseline were 28.8 ± 7.4 and 4.5 ± 7.4, respectively. A minimal clinically important difference of 6 was determined by comparison of index change with changes in categorical self-assessments of improvement. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first patient-reported outcome measure specifically designed for adolescents and young adults with EILO.
BACKGROUND: Exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) causes exertional dyspnea and is important for its effect on quality of life, diagnostic confusion with exercise-induced asthma, and health care resource utilization. There is no validated patient-reported outcome measure specific to EILO. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop, validate, and define a minimal clinically important difference for a patient-reported outcome measure to be used with adolescents and young adults with EILO. METHODS: A multidisciplinary group created a preliminary measure, modified by a 10-member participant focus group, with 20 items scored along a 5-point Likert scale. A subsequent cohort of participants recruited from a clinic, aged 12 to 21 years, with confirmed EILO by continuous laryngoscopy during exercise testing (1) completed the measure at 3 points in time over 28 days and (2) provided anchoring data in the form of a daily exercise log and categorical self-assessments of clinical improvement. Thirty additional participants without exertional dyspnea served as controls. RESULTS: Two hundred nineteen subjects with mild to severe EILO participated in the exploratory factor analysis, which identified 7 factors within the preliminary outcome measure. After a process of item reduction, a 12-item metric with a total score ranging from 0 to 48 was developed. Mean scores of patients with EILO and healthy controls at baseline were 28.8 ± 7.4 and 4.5 ± 7.4, respectively. A minimal clinically important difference of 6 was determined by comparison of index change with changes in categorical self-assessments of improvement. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first patient-reported outcome measure specifically designed for adolescents and young adults with EILO.
Authors: Hege Havstad Clemm; J Tod Olin; Cameron McIntosh; Martin Schwellnus; Nicola Sewry; James H Hull; Thomas Halvorsen Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2022-02-22 Impact factor: 18.473