Literature DB >> 34618727

Potential Value of Presepsin Guidance in Shortening Antibiotic Therapy in Septic Patients: a Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Trial.

Hongli Xiao1, Guoxing Wang1, Yan Wang1, Zhimin Tan1, Xuelian Sun1, Jie Zhou1, Meili Duan2, Deyuan Zhi2, Ziren Tang3, Chenchen Hang3, Guoqiang Zhang4, Yan Li4, Caijun Wu5, Fengjie Li6, Haiyan Zhang7, Jing Wang8, Yun Zhang9, Xinchao Zhang10, Wei Guo11, Wenjie Qi12, Miaorong Xie1, Chunsheng Li1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Long-term use of antibiotics for septic patients leads to bacterial resistance, increased mortality, and hospital stay. In this study, we investigated an emerging biomarker presepsin-guided strategy, which can be used to evaluate the shortening of antibiotic treatment in patients with sepsis without risking a worse outcome.
METHODS: In this multicenter prospective cohort trial, patients were assigned to the presepsin or control groups. In the presepsin group, antibiotics were ceased based on predefined cut-off ranges of presepsin concentrations. The control group stopped antibiotics according to international guidelines. The primary endpoints were the number of days without antibiotics within 28 days and mortality at 28 and 90 days. Secondary endpoints were the percentage of patients with a recurrent infection, length of stay in ICU and hospital, hospitalization costs, days of first episode of antibiotic treatment, percentage of antibiotic administration and multidrug-resistant bacteria, and SOFA score.
RESULTS: Overall, 656 out of an initial 708 patients were eligible and assigned to the presepsin group (n = 327) or the control group (n = 329). Patients in the presepsin group had significantly more days without antibiotics than those in the control group (14.54 days [SD 9.01] vs. 11.01 days [SD 7.73]; P < 0.001). Mortality in the presepsin group showed no difference to that in the control group at days 28 (17.7% vs. 18.2%; P = 0.868) and 90 (19.9% vs. 19.5%; P = 0.891). Patients in the presepsin group had a significantly shorter mean length of stay in the hospital and lower hospitalization costs than control subjects. There were no differences in the rate of recurrent infection and multidrug-resistant bacteria and the SOFA score tendency between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Presepsin guidance has potential to shorten the duration of antibiotic treatment in patients with sepsis without risking worse outcomes of death, recurrent infection, and aggravation of organ failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR, ChiCTR1900024391. Registered 9 July 2019-Retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn.
Copyright © 2021 by the Shock Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34618727     DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shock        ISSN: 1073-2322            Impact factor:   3.454


  4 in total

Review 1.  Antibiotic stewardship in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Richard R Watkins
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2022-06-21

2.  Account of Deep Learning-Based Ultrasonic Image Feature in the Diagnosis of Severe Sepsis Complicated with Acute Kidney Injury.

Authors:  Yi Lv; Zhijia Huang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.238

3.  Prediction of Postoperative Sepsis Based on Changes in Presepsin Levels of Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury after Abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Chang Hwan Kim; Eun Young Kim
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-09

Review 4.  Antimicrobial Stewardship Using Biomarkers: Accumulating Evidence for the Critically Ill.

Authors:  Evdoxia Kyriazopoulou; Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.