| Literature DB >> 34616570 |
Mirong Tang1, Yan Chen2, Fuqing Sun3, Liangliang Yan1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study tends to assess the dose-dependent effects of spironolactone on TGF-β1 expression, atrial fibrosis, and the vulnerability to atrial fibrillation in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) and tries to clarify the association of atrial fibrosis with the vulnerability to atrial fibrillation.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34616570 PMCID: PMC8490048 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9924381
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiol Res Pract ISSN: 2090-0597 Impact factor: 1.866
Comparison of blood pressure, heart rate, LA size, and serum potassium in rats (M±SD).
| Group | Rat (number) | SBP (mmHg) | DBP (mmHg) | MBP (mmHg) | HR (bpm) | LA (mm) | K+ (mmol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Group SL | 10 | 186.5 ± 7.3 | 107.2 ± 6.6 | 130.2 ± 5.7 | 338.1 ± 15.6 | 3.7 ± 0.3 | 4.0 ± 0.4 |
| Group SM | 10 | 182.6 ± 8.1 | 108.5 ± 7.1 | 132.2 ± 5.2 | 342.2 ± 13.8 | 3.4 ± 0.3 | 4.1 ± 0.3 |
| Group SH | 10 | 185.2 ± 5.2 | 106.2 ± 6.4 | 130.2 ± 8.4 | 333.6 ± 18.6 | 3.7 ± 0.2 | 3.9 ± 0.4 |
| Group H | 10 | 189.2 ± 8.3 | 108.5 ± 8.6 | 138.6 ± 5.5 | 340.1 ± 14.7 | 3.8 ± 0.1# | 4.2 ± 0.2 |
| Group C | 10 | 125.2 ± 6.4 | 80.3 ± 5.2 | 91.4 ± 6.3 | 342.8 ± 16.9 | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 3.9 ± 0.5 |
|
| |||||||
| Group SL | 10 | 188.2 ± 6.4 | 111.3 ± 7.6 | 132.6 ± 6.8 | 346.5 ± 12.4 | 5.2 ± 0.1 | 4.0 ± 0.5 |
| Group SM | 10 | 185.6 ± 5.3 | 110.2 ± 6.4 | 134.2 ± 5.7 | 348.2 ± 10.6 | 5.1 ± 0.9 | 3.9 ± 0.3 |
| Group SH | 10 | 186.2 ± 8.2 | 108.3 ± 6.2 | 133.2 ± 5.2 | 342.2 ± 11.5 | 5.0 ± 0.4 | 3.9 ± 0.4 |
| Group H | 10 | 193.6 ± 10.4 | 110.2 ± 9.4 | 140.2 ± 7.8 | 350.2 ± 9.4 | 5.9 ± 0.3# | 3.0 ± 0.4 |
| Group C | 10 | 123.6 ± 5.6 | 82.2 ± 6.4 | 92.5 ± 5.4 | 341.2 ± 13.4 | 4.9 ± 0.1 | 3.9 ± 0.3 |
Blood pressure comparison with group C, p < 0.01 and p < 0.05; LA size comparison with group C, #p < 0.01. SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure, MBP: mean arterial pressure; HR: heart rate; LA: left atrial.
Myocardial cell size and interstitial collagen volume fraction (M±SD).
| Group | Rat (number) | HE staining myocardial cell size (um2) | Masson staining interstitial collagen volume fraction (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Group SL | 10 | 21016.25 ± 1604.41& | 16.40 ± 1.65& |
| Group SM | 10 | 29564.25 ± 2962.66# | 21.30 ± 2.80## |
| Group SH | 10 | 46453.67 ± 8480.74 | 23.10 ± 3.08 |
| Group H | 10 | 48224.75 ± 4657.69 | 23.40 ± 3.69 |
| Group C | 10 | 21783.75 ± 1730.17 | 15.40 ± 1.21 |
Compared with group C, p < 0.01; compared with group H, #p < 0.01 and ##p < 0.05; compared with group SM, &p < 0.05.
Figure 1HE staining of atrial tissue.
Figure 2Masson staining of atrial tissue.
The expression of TGF-β1 in atrial tissue detected by immunohistochemistry and western blot (M±SD).
| Group | Rat (number) | Immunohistochemistry TGF- | Western blot TGF- |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Group SL | 10 | 9.1 ± 1.4& | 0.91 ± 0.08& |
| Group SM | 10 | 11.2 ± 1.6## | 1.20 ± 0.06## |
| Group SH | 10 | 13.1 ± 1.4 | 1.43 ± 0.05 |
| Group H | 10 | 15.2 ± 3.1 | 1.91 ± 0.16 |
| Group C | 10 | 8.9 ± 1.2 | 0.81 ± 0.06 |
Compared with group C, p < 0.01; compared with group H, #p < 0.01 and ##p < 0.05; compared with group SM, &p < 0.05.
Figure 3Immunohistochemical staining of TGF-β1 in atrial tissue.
Figure 4Expression of TGF-β1 protein by western blot.
Electrophysiological test results (M±SD) (unit: ms).
| Group | Rat (number) | P-wave duration (ms) | PR interval (ms) | AERP (CL 150 ms) | AERP (CL 120 ms) | Inducibility of AF (%) | Duration of AF (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28-week-old | |||||||
| Group SL | 10 | 34.0 ± 2.0& | 54.3 ± 1.6& | 57.9 ± 2.3 | 57.8 ± 1.9 | 30 (3/10)& | 5.1 ± 1.6& |
| Group SM | 10 | 36.3 ± 1.8## | 55.6 ± 2.1## | 57.5 ± 1.9 | 57.4 ± 2.7 | 60 (6/10)## | 6.5 ± 1.7# |
| Group SH | 10 | 38.4 ± 1.9 | 57.4 ± 2.0 | 56.4 ± 1.7 | 56.8 ± 3.1 | 80 (8/10) | 8.9 ± 2.2. |
| Group H | 10 | 38.9 ± 1.3 | 57.2 ± 1.8 | 56.2 ± 1.4 | 56.2 ± 1.7 | 90 (9/10) | 11.5 ± 5.8 |
| Group C | 10 | 33.2 ± 1.2 | 54.0 ± 1.4 | 57.2 ± 1.7 | 56.8 ± 1.8 | 40 (4/10) | 4.7 ± 1.2 |
Compared with group C, p < 0.01 and p < 0.05; compared with group H, #p < 0.01 and ##p < 0.05; compared with group SM, &p < 0.05. AERP: atrial effective refractory period, CL: cycle length, AF: atrial fibrillation.
Figure 5(a) Electrophysiological examination: the optimal position of atrial wave amplitude higher than ventricular wave amplitude. (b) AF turns into sinus rhythm. (c) Atrial Burst stimulation (S1S1 20 ms): continuous stimulation for 30 s was used to induce AF, which was repeated 3 times. The disappearance of the P-wave and the occurrence of a typical F-wave were the markers of AF. (d) Atrial effective refractory period (AERP): AERP is defined as the longest s1-S2 interval without atrial capture.