| Literature DB >> 34616199 |
Jun Qiu1,2, Cang Ma3, Ying-Hui Jia4, Jin-Zhao Wang3, Shou-Kai Cao3, Fang-Fang Li1,4.
Abstract
Plateau pikas (Ochotonacurzoniae) are regarded as one of the main causes of the degradation of alpine meadows in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP). The population density of plateau pikas is directly related to the degree of grassland damage. In this study, field observation was conducted for one week in the southeastern QTP in August 2019. A random encounter model (REM) was used to estimate the population density of plateau pikas from photographs and videos, and the frequencies of different behaviors were calculated. In addition, the effects of water-source distance and terrain on the distribution of plateau pikas and the frequencies of different pika behaviors under different population densities were explored. The observations and knowledge derived from this study provide a reference for the population control of plateau pikas. Jun Qiu, Cang Ma, Ying-Hui Jia, Jin-Zhao Wang, Shou-Kai Cao, Fang-Fang Li.Entities:
Keywords: Dari County; Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP); field observations; population density; random encounter model (REM)
Year: 2021 PMID: 34616199 PMCID: PMC8455508 DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1059.63581
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Zookeys ISSN: 1313-2970 Impact factor: 1.546
Figure 1.Infrared camera locations.
Figure 2.Schematic diagram of the REM parameters.
Classification of plateau pika behavior.
| Behavior | Description |
|---|---|
| Foraging | Consuming food while in place or collecting food while moving |
| Traveling | Moving quickly from one place to another |
| Being vigilant | Siting on the ground with neck extended or standing with the forefeet off the ground |
| Fighting | Aggressively grabbing and biting another pika |
| Grooming | Cleaning the body with the paws or mouth |
Figure 3.Classification of plateau pika behavior a foraging b traveling c being vigilant d fighting; and e grooming.
Population density of plateau pikas estimated by REM at different locations.
| Location | Number of camera working days | Number of independent images | Number of plateau pikas per |
|---|---|---|---|
| Riverbank | 5 | 161 | 142 |
| 100 m from riverbank | 6 | 271 | 200 |
| 300 m from riverbank | 7 | 270 | 171 |
| 600 m from riverbank | 4 | 130 | 144 |
| Sunny side of gentle slope | 7 | 201 | 127 |
| Sunny side of steep slope | 6 | 105 | 77 |
|
|
|
Figure 4.Frequencies of the five behaviors defined in Table 1 and Fig. 3a percentages of occurrence of the different behaviors and b total number of occurrences of different behaviors in different locations.
Figure 5.Total number of occurrences of different behaviors during different time periods.
Figure 6.Total number of occurrences of different behaviors under different temperature gradients.
Figure 7.The area of barren land in the study area a original remote sensing images of the study area, and b images processed to identify the area of barren land.