| Literature DB >> 34615820 |
Joji Muramatsu1, Kohichi Takada1, Shintaro Sugita2, Takaaki Tsuchiya3, Keisuke Yamamoto4, Masaru Takagi5, Kazuyuki Murase1, Saki Ameda1, Yohei Arihara1, Koji Miyanishi1, Koh-Ichi Sakata3, Junji Kato1.
Abstract
An 18-year-old man presented with sudden vision loss in his left eye. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a tumor that had invaded the left optic nerve, originating from the left posterior ethmoid sinus. Immunohistochemical analyses identified positive staining for NUT protein in the nuclei of tumor cells. We diagnosed locally advanced NUT carcinoma (NC) and initiated concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), consisting of chemotherapy with vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide, alternating with ifosphamide and etoposide, plus radiation therapy. The patient achieved a complete response. CCRT can be a useful treatment option for adolescent and young-adult patients with locally advanced unresectable NC.Entities:
Keywords: NUT carcinoma; VDC-IE regimen; concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34615820 PMCID: PMC9107965 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.7741-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intern Med ISSN: 0918-2918 Impact factor: 1.282
Figure 1.Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a left posterior ethmoid sinus mass (A, arrows), and positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) revealed a mass that showed an increased 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake (B).
Figure 2.Endoscopic findings of the middle nasal meatus in an operation. The tumor (asterisk) extended from the posterior ethmoid sinus into the skull base and the orbit (dotted line). lp: lamina papyracea, ms: maxillary sinus, mt: middle turbinate, sb: skull base
Figure 3.Microscopic findings of the resected tumor. Hematoxylin and Eosin staining (A, ×200). NUT staining (B, ×200).
Typical Immunohistochemical Staining Patterns of Various Small Round-cell Tumors in the Ethmoid Sinus.
| Ref. | Histology | CK5/6 | p40 | Cluster of differentiation* | S100 | Synaptophysin | INI-1 | EBER-ISH | NUT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | NC | 5/6+ | + | - | - | - | + | - | + |
| 3 | SNUC | 5/6- | - | - | - | - | + | - | - |
| 3 | Lymphoepithelial carcinoma | 5/6+ | + | - | - | - | + | + | - |
| 4 | Malignant lymphoma | 5/6- | - | + | - | - | + | ** | - |
| 5 | Olfactory neuroblastoma | 5/6- | - | - | + | + | + | - | - |
| 3 | SMARCB1(INI-1)-deficient sinonasal carcinoma | 5+ | + | - | +(focal) | - | - | - | |
| 6 | ESFT (PNET) | 5/6- | - | - | + | + | + | - | - |
| Our case | 5/6+(mild) | +(focal) | - | - | - | + | - | + |
*CD3, 4, 8, 20, 56. **generally negative, except for NK/T cell lymphoma (100% positive), Hodgkin lymphoma (40% positive), or Burkitt lymphoma (10% positive). CK5/6: cytokeratin5/6, EBER-ISH: Epstein–Barr virus-encoded small RNA insitu hybridization, ESFT (PNET): Ewing sarcoma family of tumors (peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor), INI-1: integrase interactor 1, NC: NUT carcinoma, SMARCB1: SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily b, member 1, SNUC: sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma
Figure 4.Results of a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of NUTM1 showing a NUTM1 split signal (arrows) and a fused signal (arrowhead) in the tumor.
Figure 5.Clinical course. CPA: cyclophosphamide, CR: complete response, DXR: doxorubicin, ETP: etoposide, IE: ifosphamide, and etoposide, IFO: ifosfamide, m: months, PBR: proton beam radiotherapy, RT: radiotherapy, VAC: vincristine, actinomycin D, and cyclophosphamide, VCR: vincristine, VDC: vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide, X: initiation of therapy
Figure 6.Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (A) and positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) (B) after treatment. MRI and PET-CT did not reveal any abnormalities with signs of relapse.
Efficacies of Regimens for Ewing Sarcoma in Patients with NUT Carcinoma.
| Case | Ref. | Age (y)/ | Primary | Metastasis | NUT | 1st line | 2nd line | Efficacy | OS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | 10/M | Ilium | - | BRD4 | VAI-PAI-VAI ×4 | - | CR | 13 y |
| 2 | 11 | 9/M | Sublingual | Cervical L/N | NA | Surgery | - | CR | 6 y |
| 3 | 11 | 9/M | Parotid | Cervical L/N | NA | Surgery | - | CR | 15 M |
| 4 | 12 | 49/M | Nasal | Ilium | NA | VDCx6 | CDDP | PD | 9 M |
| 5 | 13 | 15/F | Nasal | - | BRD3 | VAI-PAI-VAI ×4 | - | CR | 34 M |
| 6 | 14 | 12/F | Nasal | Vertebral body, | NA | VDC-IE ×14 | - | CR | 40 M |
| Our case | 18/M | Ethmoid | - | NA | VDC-IE ×17 | PBR | CR | 26 M |
Cases 1-3, and 5 were treated with a vincristine, doxorubicin, ifosfamide (VAI)-cisplatin, doxorubicin, ifosfamide (PAI) regimen. Cases 4 and 6 and our case were treated with a vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (VDC) or VDC-ifosfamide and etoposide (IE) regimen. CDDP: cisplatin, CR: complete response, L/N: lymph node, NA: not applicable, OS: overall survival, PD: progressive disease, PBR: proton beam radiotherapy, RBE: relative biological effectiveness, RT: radiotherapy