| Literature DB >> 34614475 |
Farah Deeba1, Caitlin Schneider2, Shahed Mohammed2, Mohammad Honarvar3, Julio Lobo3, Edward Tam4, Septimiu Salcudean2, Robert Rohling5.
Abstract
Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) offers a non-invasive and objective way to quantify tissue health. We recently presented a spatially adaptive regularization method for reconstruction of a single QUS parameter, limited to a two dimensional region. That proof-of-concept study showed that regularization using homogeneity prior improves the fundamental precision-resolution trade-off in QUS estimation. Based on the weighted regularization scheme, we now present a multiparametric 3D weighted QUS (3D QUS) method, involving the reconstruction of three QUS parameters: attenuation coefficient estimate (ACE), integrated backscatter coefficient (IBC) and effective scatterer diameter (ESD). With the phantom studies, we demonstrate that our proposed method accurately reconstructs QUS parameters, resulting in high reconstruction contrast and therefore improved diagnostic utility. Additionally, the proposed method offers the ability to analyze the spatial distribution of QUS parameters in 3D, which allows for superior tissue characterization. We apply a three-dimensional total variation regularization method for the volumetric QUS reconstruction. The 3D regularization involving N planes results in a high QUS estimation precision, with an improvement of standard deviation over the theoretical 1/N rate achievable by compounding N independent realizations. In the in vivo liver study, we demonstrate the advantage of adopting a multiparametric approach over the single parametric counterpart, where a simple quadratic discriminant classifier using feature combination of three QUS parameters was able to attain a perfect classification performance to distinguish between normal and fatty liver cases.Entities:
Keywords: Attenuation coefficient estimate; Backscatter coefficient; Effective scatterer diameter; Hepatic steatosis; Quantitative ultrasound
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34614475 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102245
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Image Anal ISSN: 1361-8415 Impact factor: 8.545