Michael Haber1, Jacqueline E Tate2, Benjamin A Lopman2,3, Wenrui Qi1, Kylie E C Ainslie4, Umesh D Parashar2. 1. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 4. Mrc Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Vaccination has significantly reduced morbidity and mortality resulting from rotavirus infection worldwide. However, rotavirus vaccine efficacy (VE) appears to wane over the first 2 years since vaccination, particularly in developing countries. Statistical methods for detecting VE waning and estimating its rate have been used in a few studies, but comparisons of methods for evaluating VE waning have not yet been performed. In this work we present and compare three methods - Durham's method, Tian's method, and time-dependent covariate (TDC) method - based on generalizations of the Cox proportional hazard model. METHODS: We developed a new stochastic agent-based simulation model to generate data from a hypothetical rotavirus vaccine trial where the protective efficacy of the vaccine may vary over time. Input parameters to the simulation model were obtained from studies on rotavirus infections in four developing countries. We applied each of the methods to four simulated datasets and compared the type-1 error probabilities and the powers of the resulting statistical tests. We also compared estimated and true values of VE over time. RESULTS: Durham's method had the highest power of detecting true VE waning of the three methods. This method also provided quite accurate estimates of VE in each period and of the per-period drop in VE. CONCLUSIONS: Durham's method is somewhat more powerful than the other two Cox proportional hazards model-based methods for detecting VE waning and provides more information about the temporal behavior of VE.
INTRODUCTION: Vaccination has significantly reduced morbidity and mortality resulting from rotavirus infection worldwide. However, rotavirus vaccine efficacy (VE) appears to wane over the first 2 years since vaccination, particularly in developing countries. Statistical methods for detecting VE waning and estimating its rate have been used in a few studies, but comparisons of methods for evaluating VE waning have not yet been performed. In this work we present and compare three methods - Durham's method, Tian's method, and time-dependent covariate (TDC) method - based on generalizations of the Cox proportional hazard model. METHODS: We developed a new stochastic agent-based simulation model to generate data from a hypothetical rotavirus vaccine trial where the protective efficacy of the vaccine may vary over time. Input parameters to the simulation model were obtained from studies on rotavirus infections in four developing countries. We applied each of the methods to four simulated datasets and compared the type-1 error probabilities and the powers of the resulting statistical tests. We also compared estimated and true values of VE over time. RESULTS: Durham's method had the highest power of detecting true VE waning of the three methods. This method also provided quite accurate estimates of VE in each period and of the per-period drop in VE. CONCLUSIONS: Durham's method is somewhat more powerful than the other two Cox proportional hazards model-based methods for detecting VE waning and provides more information about the temporal behavior of VE.
Authors: Elizabeth T Rogawski; James A Platts-Mills; E Ross Colgate; Rashidul Haque; K Zaman; William A Petri; Beth D Kirkpatrick Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Venkata Raghava Mohan; Ramanujam Karthikeyan; Sudhir Babji; Monica McGrath; Sanjaya Shrestha; Jasmin Shrestha; Estomih Mdumah; Caroline Amour; Amidou Samie; Emanuel Nyathi; Rashidul Haque; Shahida Qureshi; Pablo Peñataro Yori; Aldo A M Lima; Ladaporn Bodhidatta; Erling Svensen; Pascal Bessong; Tahmeed Ahmed; Jessica C Seidman; Anita K M Zaidi; Margaret N Kosek; Richard L Guerrant; Jean Gratz; James A Platts-Mills; Dennis R Lang; Michael Gottlieb; Eric R Houpt; Gagandeep Kang Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Andrew Clark; Kevin van Zandvoort; Stefan Flasche; Colin Sanderson; Julie Bines; Jacqueline Tate; Umesh Parashar; Mark Jit Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 25.071