| Literature DB >> 34613701 |
Raquel Ferrer-Lorente1,2, Tania Lozano-Cruz3, Irene Fernández-Carasa4, Katarzyna Miłowska5, Francisco Javier de la Mata2,3, Maria Bryszewska5, Antonella Consiglio4,6, Paula Ortega2,3, Rafael Gómez2,3, Angel Raya1,2,7.
Abstract
Accumulation of misfolded α-synuclein (α-syn) is a hallmark of Parkinson's disease (PD) thought to play important roles in the pathophysiology of the disease. Dendritic systems, able to modulate the folding of proteins, have emerged as promising new therapeutic strategies for PD treatment. Dendrimers have been shown to be effective at inhibiting α-syn aggregation in cell-free systems and in cell lines. Here, we set out to investigate the effects of dendrimers on endogenous α-syn accumulation in disease-relevant cell types from PD patients. For this purpose, we chose cationic carbosilane dendrimers of bow-tie topology based on their performance at inhibiting α-syn aggregation in vitro. Dopamine neurons were differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines generated from PD patients carrying the LRRK2G2019S mutation, which reportedly display abnormal accumulation of α-syn, and from healthy individuals as controls. Treatment of PD dopamine neurons with non-cytotoxic concentrations of dendrimers was effective at preventing abnormal accumulation and aggregation of α-syn. Our results in a genuinely human experimental model of PD highlight the therapeutic potential of dendritic systems and open the way to developing safe and efficient therapies for delaying or even halting PD progression.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34613701 PMCID: PMC8906628 DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c00884
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomacromolecules ISSN: 1525-7797 Impact factor: 6.988
Summary of Healthy Controls and Patients Used in This Study
| code | status | gender | age at biopsy | mutation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTRL1 | Control | M | 66 | no |
| CRTL2 | Control | F | 48 | no |
| LRRK2-PD1 | Parkinson’s disease | M | 66 | G2019S (LRRK2) |
| LRRK2-PD2 | Parkinson’s disease | F | 63 | G2019S (LRRK2) |
Figure 1Dendritic structures of G1Si(SNMe3I)8 (I) as a spherical dendrimer, (HOC6H4)G3Gn(SNMe3I)8 (II) as a dendron, and (IMe3NS)4G2[OC6H4O]G2(SNMe3I)4 (III) as a bow-tie system.
Figure 2(A) α-Synuclein zeta potential in the presence of carbosilane dendrimers: spherical I (red), dendron II (green), and bow-tie III (blue). (B) Determination of the number of dendritic system molecules attached to α-syn.
Figure 3CD spectra of α-synuclein (c = 1 μM) alone and in the presence of dendritic systems I–III.
Figure 4CD spectra of α-synuclein alone and in the presence of dendritic systems I–III after 48–72 h of incubation.
Figure 5(A) Schematic representation of the differentiation protocol implemented for the generation of DAns from iPSCs generated from two PD patients (LRRK2-PD) and two healthy age-matched controls (CTRL). (B) Analyses of cell viability in an acute exposure (48 h) testing two different doses of dendrimer III (1 and 3 μM). Bars represent means with SEM as error bars. (n = 4, using 2 LRRK2-PD-DAn lines from two independent experiments for each condition). (C–E) Cytoplasmic accumulation of α-syn in LRRK2-PD-DAns and LRRK2-PD-DAns treated with 1 μM III for 48 h. Quantitative analyses of α-syn intensity (n = 42–45, using 2 LRRK2-PD-DAn lines from two-independent experiments, and ****p < 0.0001) (C). Representative immunofluorescence images showing diffuse cytoplasmic accumulation of α-syn in LRRK2-PD-DAns (D) and LRRK2-PD-DAns treated with 1 μM III for 48 h (E). Scale bars, 25 μm.
Figure 6α-Syn accumulation in DAns after 30 days of differentiation. (A,B) Quantitative analyses of α-syn-positive DAn (A) and α-syn aggregates (B). Bars represent means with SEM as error bars. (n = 4, using 2 LRRK2-PD-DAn lines and 2 CTRL-DAn lines from two independent experiments). The differences in both, diffuse cytoplasmic α-syn staining and α-syn aggregates accumulation, are statistically significant (*p < 0.05) comparing LRRK2-PD-DAn + 1 μM III or CTRL-DAns to untreated LRRK2-PD-DAns. No significant differences (ns) were observed between LRRK2-PD-DAns + 1 μM III and CTRL-DAns. (C–E) Representative immunofluorescence images showing α-syn aggregates accumulation in LRRK2-PD-DAns; scale bar, 7.5 μm (C), LRRK2-PD-DAns treated with 1 μM III for 48 h; scale bar, 10 μm (D), and CTRL-DAns; scale bar, 25 μm (E).