Literature DB >> 34613668

Acceptability of Vaccines Against Preventable Infections Including Coronavirus Disease 2019 Among Patients With Rheumatic Disease.

Sara K Tedeschi1, Jack Ellrodt1, Jacklyn Stratton1, Leah Santacroce1, Paulette D Chandler1, Ellen M Gravallese1, Daniel H Solomon1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Vaccination against preventable infections is widely recommended for patients with systemic rheumatic disease. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted variability in attitudes toward vaccination, particularly with the use of novel vaccine platforms. We studied attitudes toward vaccination against COVID-19 and other preventable infections among patients with systemic rheumatic disease and compared these against the general population.
METHODS: We surveyed patients treated at Brigham and Women's Hospital for systemic rheumatic disease using a secure web-based survey or paper survey in English or Spanish, from December 2020 to April 2021. We included survey questions used in the nationwide Harris Poll (October 2020 and February 2021), allowing the comparison of responses with those from the general population. Response frequencies were estimated and compared using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: Of 243 participants (25% response rate), the mean age was 56 years, 82% were women, and 33% were nonwhite. Rheumatoid arthritis (50%) and systemic lupus erythematosus (28%) were the most common diagnoses. Thirty percent had been hospitalized previously for any infection. Seventy-six percent worried a lot or somewhat about contracting COVID-19. Attitudes toward vaccination were very favorable, with 92% having received a flu shot in the past year and 84% desiring a COVID-19 vaccine as soon as possible compared with 30% to 40% of Harris Poll respondents (P < 0.001). Physician recommendation to receive a vaccine and desire to avoid infection were the most common reasons for desiring vaccinations.
CONCLUSION: Vaccine acceptability, including toward COVID-19 vaccines, was high among this population of patients with systemic rheumatic disease seen at an academic medical center cohort. Physician recommendation is a key factor for vaccine uptake.
© 2021 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34613668      PMCID: PMC8652709          DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACR Open Rheumatol        ISSN: 2578-5745


Eighty‐four percent of patients with systemic rheumatic diseases expressed willingness to receive a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccine as soon as possible, compared with 30% to 40% of general population respondents in nationwide Harris Polls. Many patients (76%) with systemic rheumatic disease who were using immunomodulators expressed concern about contracting COVID‐19. Patients rated their physician’s recommendation as the most important factor in deciding whether receipt of a vaccine was acceptable.

INTRODUCTION

Vaccine‐preventable illnesses such as influenza, pneumococcal pneumonia, herpes zoster, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pose a serious risk to patients with systemic rheumatic disease, leading to hospitalizations, increased costs of care, and disability (1, 2). Vaccination against preventable illness is generally recommended for patients with systemic rheumatic diseases; exceptions include the use of live‐virus vaccines with particular immunomodulator therapies (3). Despite the availability and general safety of vaccines against these pathogens, uptake of influenza, pneumococcal, herpes zoster, and human papillomavirus vaccines in patients with rheumatic disease is variable (2). Vaccination rates during the COVID‐19 pandemic highlight the variability in attitudes toward vaccination, particularly using novel vaccine platforms that have undergone accelerated development and testing (4, 5). Preventing COVID‐19 in patients with systemic rheumatic disease is paramount for protecting individual patients and promoting public health, as immunosuppressed patients may serve as a reservoir for COVID‐19, with prolonged viral shedding and increased opportunity for the development of viral variants (6). The American College of Rheumatology recently recommended vaccination against COVID‐19 for the vast majority of patients with systemic rheumatic disease (7). Phase 3 clinical trial data in nonrheumatic populations demonstrate excellent safety and efficacy of COVID‐19 vaccines for preventing severe COVID‐19 illness (8, 9). Moreover, limited data in patients with systemic rheumatic disease suggest similar safety profiles, with reduced immunogenicity in the context of certain immunomodulators (10, 11). Because of the paucity of safety and efficacy data on the COVID‐19 vaccine in patients with systemic rheumatic disease, as well as the special concerns related to immunomodulator use, there may be important differences in attitudes toward COVID‐19 vaccination between patients with systemic rheumatic disease and the general population. Little is known about vaccine attitudes in patients with systemic rheumatic disease and about their attitudes compared with those of the general population, specifically regarding COVID‐19 vaccination. We aimed to identify attitudes toward infections and vaccination against COVID‐19 and other preventable illnesses among patients with systemic rheumatic disease and to compare these with those of the general population.

METHODS

We invited a convenience sample of patients to participate if they had been previously diagnosed with systemic rheumatic disease and had two or more virtual or in‐person visits to Brigham and Women’s Hospital Arthritis Center from 2019 to 2020. Patients who previously provided permission to receive emails about research opportunities were invited to complete a secure, web‐based REDCap survey in English or Spanish. Other patients were invited to participate via mailed letters. Efforts were made to over‐recruit Spanish‐speakers and nonwhite patients, given the disproportionate burden of COVID‐19 in these populations. Surveys were distributed from December 2020 to January 2021; responses were accepted through April 2021. The survey included questions about demographics, socioeconomic status, rheumatic disease diagnoses and treatments, comorbidities relevant to the risk of severe COVID‐19, prior infections, prior vaccination, COVID‐19 infection, and vaccination against COVID‐19. We summarized responses with descriptive statistics. Survey responses were compared with general population responses from the nationwide Harris Poll Survey Wave 36 (October 2020, n = 1954 respondents) and Wave 50 (February 2021, n = 2043 respondents), which included questions similar to those asked on our survey, using χ2 tests (12). The Partners HealthCare Institutional Review Board approved all aspects of this study (protocol 2020P003229).

RESULTS

We invited 968 patients to participate and received 243 completed surveys (25.1% response rate). Participants had a mean age of 56.0 years, 81.5% were women, and 33.3% were nonwhite; 6.6% completed the survey in Spanish (Table 1). Three‐quarters of participants had a college degree or higher. Rheumatoid arthritis was the most common rheumatic disease (49.8%), followed by systemic lupus erythematosus (27.6%) and psoriatic arthritis (13.2%); the remainder of patients (9.5%) had inflammatory myositis (n = 7), scleroderma (n = 7), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 4), giant cell arteritis (n = 4), or polymyalgia rheumatica (n = 1). Of respondents, 87.6% were using a disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) and/or glucocorticoids. Among the comorbidities associated with increased risk for severe COVID‐19, hypertension was most common (34.6%), followed by lung disease (20.2%) and obesity (15.2%). Current smoking was rare (2.5%).
Table 1

Characteristics of 243 survey respondents

CharacteristicsResults
Age, mean (SD), y56.0 (14.5)
Gender, %
Man18.1
Woman81.5
Transgender0.4
Race, %
White66.7
Black10.3
Asian15.6
Other or choose not to answer9.5
Latinx a 12.5
Primary language, %
English91.8
Spanish6.6
Other1.7
Living situation, b %
Alone17.7
Roommates2.9
Partner/spouse64.6
Children34.6
Other family13.6
Assisted living or skilled nursing facility0.4
Total annual household income, a %
<$50 00014.2
$50 000 to $100 00024.3
$100 000 to >$200 00057.7
Choose not to answer17.2
Highest level of education, a %
High school graduate or less7.4
Some college16.5
College graduate34.3
Postcollege degree41.7
Systemic rheumatic disease, %
Rheumatoid arthritis49.8
Systemic lupus erythematosus27.6
Psoriatic arthritis13.2
Other c 9.5
Rheumatic disease treatment, b %
None12.4
Conventional synthetic DMARD60.1
TNF inhibitor18.5
Other biologic14.0
JAK inhibitor9.9
Glucocorticoid16.5
Self‐reported comorbidities, %
Cancer11.9
Lung disease20.2
Chronic kidney disease9.9
Coronary artery disease4.1
Diabetes9.5
Heart failure2.9
Hypertension34.6
Obesity15.2
Stroke5.8
Current smoker, %2.5
Has a primary care doctor, a %97.5
Always wears sunscreen, a %51.3
Always wears a seatbelt, %98.4

DMARD, disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug; JAK, Janus kinase; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.

Data were missing for Latinx (n = 3), income (n = 4), education (n = 1), primary care doctor (n = 1), and sunscreen (n = 5).

Categories are not mutually exclusive.

Inflammatory myositis (n = 7), scleroderma (n = 7), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 4), giant cell arteritis (n = 4), or polymyalgia rheumatica (n = 1).

Characteristics of 243 survey respondents DMARD, disease‐modifying antirheumatic drug; JAK, Janus kinase; TNF, tumor necrosis factor. Data were missing for Latinx (n = 3), income (n = 4), education (n = 1), primary care doctor (n = 1), and sunscreen (n = 5). Categories are not mutually exclusive. Inflammatory myositis (n = 7), scleroderma (n = 7), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 4), giant cell arteritis (n = 4), or polymyalgia rheumatica (n = 1). Thirty percent of respondents had previously been hospitalized for any type of infection. Attitudes toward vaccination were positive, with 90.5% indicating they were “very in favor” or “pretty much in favor” of vaccines in general (Table 2). The uptake of the influenza vaccine in the past year was very high (92.4%). Prior pneumococcal vaccination (71.2%) was more frequent than vaccination against herpes zoster (48.2%). Recommendation by a doctor (89.7%) and the desire to avoid infection (70.4%) were the most common reasons for previously receiving vaccines. Among the 10.7% of respondents who had declined a vaccine in the past, reasons included concerns about the possible flare of rheumatic disease (n = 5), concerns about safety (n = 4), not believing in getting vaccines (n = 4), previous adverse reaction to vaccines (n = 4), and allergy (n = 3).
Table 2

Vaccination history and attitudes toward vaccination

Percentage
Vaccines in general
Where would you consider yourself on the following spectrum regarding vaccines in general? a
I am strongly against vaccines0
I am pretty much against vaccines1.7
Neutral7.9
I’m pretty much in favor17.8
I am very in favor of vaccines72.7
Received flu shot last year a 92.4
Previous vaccines (ever)
Flu97.5
Pneumonia71.2
Shingles48.2
Tdap51.9
Yellow fever7.0
Hepatitis A19.8
Hepatitis B30.5
HPV10.7
Reasons for receiving previous vaccines
Doctor advised me to get it89.7
Important for community health45.3
Easy to do36.6
Wanted to avoid infection70.4
International travel18.1
Cost was covered by health insurance20.6
Family encouraged me to get it7.0
Other c 6.6
Ever declined a vaccine that your doctor recommended for you to get10.7
COVID‐19 vaccine b
When there is a coronavirus vaccine, will you get vaccinated?
Yes91.4
No1.7
Not sure7.0
When would you want to get the coronavirus vaccine? a
As soon as possible84.1
Within the first year that it’s available but not as soon as possible10.0
I would want to wait until other people have been getting it for at least 1 year5.9
Features of a coronavirus vaccine rated “important” or “very important” a
Safety95.4
How well it works94.9
Cost to me27.7
If I have to stop my medicines61.5
Only one dose (versus several doses) required24.7

COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019; HPV, human papillomavirus.

N = 243.

Data were missing for general attitude toward vaccines (n = 1), flu shot last year (n = 5), timing of COVID vaccine (n = 4), vaccine safety (n = 2), how well it works (n = 7), cost (n = 8), stopping medications (n = 12), and number of doses (n = 8).

Survey distribution began before any COVID‐19 vaccine had received United States Food and Drug Administration Emergency Use Authorization.

Required by employer or school (n = 7) was most common.

Vaccination history and attitudes toward vaccination COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019; HPV, human papillomavirus. N = 243. Data were missing for general attitude toward vaccines (n = 1), flu shot last year (n = 5), timing of COVID vaccine (n = 4), vaccine safety (n = 2), how well it works (n = 7), cost (n = 8), stopping medications (n = 12), and number of doses (n = 8). Survey distribution began before any COVID‐19 vaccine had received United States Food and Drug Administration Emergency Use Authorization. Required by employer or school (n = 7) was most common. The desire to receive a COVID‐19 vaccine was very high, with 91.4% wanting to get vaccinated; 7.0% were unsure, and 1.7% did not want to get vaccinated. Variation by self‐reported racial and ethnic groups was observed, with 79.2% of Black participants desiring COVID‐19 vaccination as compared with 83.3% of Latinx participants, 92.1% of Asian participants, and 93.1% of white participants (Supplemental Table). Intent to receive a COVID‐19 vaccine (yes vs no/not sure) did not differ by immunomodulator use (P = 0.99), race (P = 0.16), or Latinx ethnicity (P = 0.10). Enthusiasm for receiving a COVID‐19 vaccine as soon as possible was high (84.1%) in our cohort. The percentage of Harris Poll general population respondents indicating they were very likely to get a COVID‐19 vaccine as soon as possible was significantly lower compared with our cohort (29% in October 2020 [P < 0.001] and 42% in February 2021 [P < 0.001]). Survey participants rated safety (95.4%) and effectiveness (94.9%) as the most important features of a COVID‐19 vaccine. Of participants, 61.5% noted concerns about needing to stop their immunomodulator treatment around the time of vaccination. Eighty‐five percent of participants said they were very likely to get a COVID‐19 vaccine if it decreased their risk of infection by approximately 75%, and 91.6% were very likely to go get it if it reduced the risk by more than 90%. For comparison, 31% of respondents to the Harris Poll survey (October 2020) were very likely to get a COVID‐19 vaccine if it reduced risk by approximately 75%, and 38% were very likely if the vaccine reduced risk by more than 90%. Participants reported worrying a lot (44.0%) or somewhat (41.6%) about contracting COVID‐19; 5.8% reported prior COVID‐19 infection (Table 3). Two‐thirds reported having a family member or friend with COVID‐19 infection. Physical distancing behaviors were common, including staying home as much as possible (89.3%), wearing a mask every time outside of the house (94.7%), and avoiding public transportation (77.8%).
Table 3

Attitudes and practices related to COVID‐19

Percentage
In general, how much do you worry about having an infection that would require you to be hospitalized? a
A lot32.4
Somewhat43.2
Not at all24.5
Are you worried about getting infected with the coronavirus?
I have already had the coronavirus5.8
I worry a lot44.0
I worry somewhat41.6
I am not worried8.6
What is your best guess as to whether you will get the coronavirus in the next 6 months? a
I have already had it5.5
I don’t think I will get it63.3
I think I will get a mild case10.1
I think I will get seriously ill21.1
Friends or family member had coronavirus infection64.6
Exposed to someone with COVID‐19 a 16.2
How many times have you been tested for coronavirus using a nasal swab? a mean (SD)3.0 (6.6)
Contact with others in the workplace b
Limited contact with others43.2
Frequent contact with others11.9
Direct contact with patients with COVID‐191.7
Not currently working46.5
What types of physical distancing measures are you practicing?
I stay at home as much as I can89.3
I am working remotely36.6
I wear a mask every time I leave the house94.7
I avoid public transportation77.8
I am not interacting with anyone beyond the people I live with42.8
My school‐aged children are doing virtual learning8.2
I socialize with people outdoors46.5
I’m not taking any measures for physical distancing0.8

COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019.

Data missing for hospitalization worry (n = 2), best guess (n = 6), exposed to COVID (n = 2), and number of COVID‐19 tests (n = 8).

Categories are not mutually exclusive.

Attitudes and practices related to COVID‐19 COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019. Data missing for hospitalization worry (n = 2), best guess (n = 6), exposed to COVID (n = 2), and number of COVID‐19 tests (n = 8). Categories are not mutually exclusive.

DISCUSSION

Vaccine acceptability was high in this cohort of patients with systemic rheumatic disease treated at an academic medical center, in whom approximately one‐third had been previously hospitalized for an infection. Recommendation by a doctor and the desire to avoid infection were the most common reasons for previously receiving vaccines. Influenza vaccine uptake was nearly universal; by comparison, 56.8% of adults in Massachusetts were vaccinated against influenza in the 2019 to 2020 season (13). Prior vaccination against pneumococcus and herpes zoster was common among participants. Eighty‐six percent of participants were worried a lot or somewhat about contracting COVID‐19, and physical distancing measures were widely practiced. Intent to be vaccinated against COVID‐19 as soon as possible was significantly more common among patients with systemic rheumatic disease compared with the general population. A survey of 732 patients with systemic rheumatic disease in Turkey reported that half were undecided about whether to get a COVID‐19 vaccine as of January 2021 (14). Among 1266 European patients with systemic rheumatic disease surveyed in December 2020, 54% were willing to get vaccinated against COVID‐19, 32% were uncertain, and 13% were unwilling (4). Two Italian surveys of patients with systemic rheumatic disease reported that 54% (of 626) and 81% (of 202) were willing to get a COVID‐19 vaccine (5, 15). Higher educational level, older age, and male sex were associated with increased COVID‐19 vaccine willingness in those studies (5, 15). Immunosuppressive medication use was not associated with COVID vaccine acceptability among patients with systemic rheumatic disease in our study or in prior work (5). Physician recommendation has a positive impact on vaccine uptake among patients with a rheumatic disease (16). Specific to COVID‐19 vaccines, endorsement by a physician was the most important factor influencing patients with rheumatic disease to accept a COVID‐19 vaccine (15). Results from the present study confirm these prior findings. Limitations of the present study include enrolling patients from only one academic medical center; most patients were local residents, but they may not reflect a typical rheumatic disease patient cohort. The response rate of 25% is acceptable and expected to result in similar findings to a higher response rate (17). However, some of the nonresponders may not have been as enthusiastic about receiving a COVID‐19 vaccine compared with responders. Secular trends in knowledge about COVID‐19 vaccines changed during the study period and may have influenced results as well as comparability to the Harris Poll Wave 36 (October 2020). Participants were predominantly female with a high educational level and high use of preventive health measures, which limits generalizability. However, 13% of respondents identified as Latinx, and 33% were nonwhite, representing populations that are at higher risk for severe COVID‐19 in the general population. In conclusion, the acceptability of a COVID‐19 vaccine was substantially higher in our cohort of patients with systemic rheumatic disease compared with the general population. Concern about contracting COVID‐19 was very common. Physician recommendation to receive a vaccine against COVID‐19 or other preventable illnesses is the most important factor influencing vaccine uptake in this population, followed by the desire to avoid infection.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Dr. Tedeschi drafted the manuscript and all authors revised it critically for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final version to be published. Dr. Tedeschi had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study conception and design

Tedeschi, Chandler, Gravallese, Solomon.

Acquisition of data

Ellrodt, Stratton, Tedeschi.

Analysis and interpretation of data

Santacroce, Tedeschi, Solomon. Table S1 Click here for additional data file.
  15 in total

1.  2019 update of EULAR recommendations for vaccination in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Victoria Furer; Christien Rondaan; Marloes W Heijstek; Nancy Agmon-Levin; Sander van Assen; Marc Bijl; Ferry C Breedveld; Raffaele D'Amelio; Maxime Dougados; Meliha Crnkic Kapetanovic; Jacob M van Laar; A de Thurah; Robert Bm Landewé; Anna Molto; Ulf Müller-Ladner; Karen Schreiber; Leo Smolar; Jim Walker; Klaus Warnatz; Nico M Wulffraat; Ori Elkayam
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy among patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a message for rheumatologists.

Authors:  Roberta Priori; Greta Pellegrino; Serena Colafrancesco; Cristiano Alessandri; Fulvia Ceccarelli; Manuela Di Franco; Valeria Riccieri; Rossana Scrivo; Antonio Sili Scavalli; Francesca Romana Spinelli; Fabrizio Conti
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Predictors for influenza vaccine acceptance among patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Nicole Harrison; Wolfgang Poeppl; Manuel Miksch; Klaus Machold; Hans Kiener; Daniel Aletaha; Josef S Smolen; Christina Forstner; Heinz Burgmann; Heimo Lagler
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Safety of the first dose of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.

Authors:  Caoilfhionn M Connolly; Jake A Ruddy; Brian J Boyarsky; Robin K Avery; William A Werbel; Dorry L Segev; Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang; Julie J Paik
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Potential acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine in rheumatological patients: a monocentric comparative survey.

Authors:  Corrado Campochiaro; Giorgia Trignani; Alessandro Tomelleri; Stefano Cascinu; Lorenzo Dagna
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  American College of Rheumatology Guidance for COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients With Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases: Version 1.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Sindhu R Johnson; Donald D Anthony; Reuben J Arasaratnam; Lindsey R Baden; Anne R Bass; Cassandra Calabrese; Ellen M Gravallese; Rafael Harpaz; Rebecca E Sadun; Amy S Turner; Eleanor Anderson Williams; Ted R Mikuls
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 10.995

7.  Avoidable Acute Care Use for Vaccine-Preventable Illnesses Among Medicaid Beneficiaries With Lupus.

Authors:  Candace H Feldman; Chang Xu; Karen H Costenbader
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 5.178

8.  Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine.

Authors:  Lindsey R Baden; Hana M El Sahly; Brandon Essink; Karen Kotloff; Sharon Frey; Rick Novak; David Diemert; Stephen A Spector; Nadine Rouphael; C Buddy Creech; John McGettigan; Shishir Khetan; Nathan Segall; Joel Solis; Adam Brosz; Carlos Fierro; Howard Schwartz; Kathleen Neuzil; Larry Corey; Peter Gilbert; Holly Janes; Dean Follmann; Mary Marovich; John Mascola; Laura Polakowski; Julie Ledgerwood; Barney S Graham; Hamilton Bennett; Rolando Pajon; Conor Knightly; Brett Leav; Weiping Deng; Honghong Zhou; Shu Han; Melanie Ivarsson; Jacqueline Miller; Tal Zaks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Willingness to get the COVID-19 vaccine among patients with rheumatic diseases, healthcare workers and general population in Turkey: a web-based survey.

Authors:  Berna Yurttas; Burc Cagri Poyraz; Necdet Sut; Ayse Ozdede; Mert Oztas; Serdal Uğurlu; Fehmi Tabak; Vedat Hamuryudan; Emire Seyahi
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.631

10.  Incidence and prevalence of vaccine preventable infections in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD): a systemic literature review informing the 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for vaccination in adult patients with AIIRD.

Authors:  Victoria Furer; Christien Rondaan; Marloes Heijstek; Sander van Assen; Marc Bijl; Nancy Agmon-Levin; Ferdinand C Breedveld; Raffaele D'Amelio; Maxime Dougados; Meliha Crnkic Kapetanovic; Jacob M van Laar; Annette Ladefoged de Thurah; Robert Landewé; Anna Molto; Ulf Müller-Ladner; Karen Schreiber; Leo Smolar; Jim Walker; Klaus Warnatz; Nico M Wulffraat; Ori Elkayam
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2019-09-19
View more
  4 in total

1.  COVID-19 vaccination rate and willingness of an additional dose among inflammatory bowel disease patients receiving biologic therapy: Fearless and with desire.

Authors:  Laura Ramos; Marta Carrillo-Palau; Inmaculada Alonso-Abreu; Cristina Reygosa; Noemi Hernández-Alvarez; Carla Amaral; Anjara Hernández; Federica Benítez-Zafra; Fabiola Pérez-González; Haridian Quintana-Díaz; Manuel Hernandez-Guerra
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 5.867

2.  Hesitancy for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and post-vaccination flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Chi Chiu Mok; Kar Li Chan; Sau Mei Tse
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.169

3.  Barriers and facilitators to vaccination uptake against COVID-19, influenza, and pneumococcal pneumonia in immunosuppressed adults with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: A qualitative interview study during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Amy Fuller; Jennie Hancox; Kavita Vedhara; Tim Card; Christian Mallen; Jonathan S Nguyen Van-Tam; Abhishek Abhishek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Active vaccination campaign to increase seasonal influenza vaccination coverage: a monocenter experience in a cohort of Italian patients with systemic autoimmune diseases.

Authors:  Michel Chevallard; Antonella Adinolfi; Laura Belloli; Cinzia Casu; Maria Di Cicco; Chiara Destefani; Bartolomeo Di Rosa; Maria Giovanna Gentile; Davide Antonio Filippini; Angela Luisi; Marina Muscarà; Emanuela Schito; Nicola Ughi; Elisa Verduci; Emanuela Marta Vincenti; Laura Zoppini; Oscar Massimiliano Epis
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.650

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.