| Literature DB >> 34611591 |
Bahar Shahidi1, Andrew Yoo1, Christine Farnsworth2, Peter O Newton1,2, Samuel R Ward1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a condition resulting in spinal deformity and tissue adaptation of the paraspinal muscles. Although prior studies have demonstrated asymmetries in fiber type and other energetic features of muscle on the concave side of the curve, muscle morphology, architecture, and composition have not been evaluated. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare differences in paraspinal muscle microarchitecture and composition between concave and convex sides of a scoliotic curve in individuals with AIS.Entities:
Keywords: adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; deformity; muscle; spine
Year: 2021 PMID: 34611591 PMCID: PMC8479518 DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.1169
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JOR Spine ISSN: 2572-1143
FIGURE 1Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) image (×20) of muscle biopsies from the concave (A) and convex (B) sides of the curve in a single patient. Morphological features including collagen (Co), fat (*), and muscle fibers with centralized nuclei (black arrows) are highlighted. Black line is 100 μm
Participant characteristics
| Age (y) | 14.6 (2.4) |
| Females N (%) | 23 (79.3%) |
| Cobb angle (°) | 55.6 (9.9) |
| Median apical level | T8 |
| Ethnicity N (%) | |
| White | 8 (27.5%) |
| Hispanic/Latino | 15 (51.7%) |
| Black | 1 (3.4%) |
| Not reported | 5 (10.3%) |
| Height (cm) | 162.7 (9.13) |
| Weight (kg) | 57.51 (13.84) |
| BMI | 21.62 (4.3) |
| Number of levels fused | 9.93 (2.15) |
| Lenke classification N (%) | |
| A | |
| 1A | 11 (37.9%) |
| 2A | 1 (3.4%) |
| 3A | 0 |
| 4A | 0 |
| B | |
| 1B | 4 (13.8%) |
| 2B | 1 (3.4%) |
| 3B | 0 |
| 4B | 0 |
| C | |
| 1C | 5 (17.2%) |
| 2C | 0 |
| 3C | 1 (3.4%) |
| 4C | 0 |
| 5 | 2 (6.9%) |
| 6 | 4 (13.8%) |
Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.
FIGURE 2Mean (SD) fiber areas (A) and percentages of centralized nuclei (B) on the concave (black) and convex (gray) sides of the apical scoliotic curve. The dotted lines indicate literature‐based normative values for healthy skeletal muscle, and * indicates a significant difference between concave and convex sides (P < .05)
FIGURE 3Mean (SD) of tissue composition proportions between concave (black) and convex (gray) sides of the scoliotic curve for muscle (A), collagen (B), and fat (C). + indicates a trend toward a significant difference between sides (P < .10)
FIGURE 4Correlation plots between fiber size asymmetries between concave and convex sides (x‐axis) and both age; r = .43 (A) and Cobb angle; r = .40 (B). A solid line indicates a significant relationship (P < .05), whereas a dotted line indicates a trend (P < .10)