| Literature DB >> 34611527 |
YanYan Zhou1, LiPing Hao2, Chao Ji1, QiSheng Zhou3, Xin Song1, Yue Liu1, HuYing Li1, ChaoHui Li1, QiXiong Gao1, JinTai Li1, PengCheng Zhang1, XunLi Liu1,4.
Abstract
As the main economic crop cultivated in the Yellow River Delta, winter jujube contains various nutrients. However, soil salinization and fungal diseases have affected the yield and quality of winter jujube. In order to use plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) to reduce these damages, the antagonistic bacteria CZ-6 isolated from the rhizosphere of wheat in saline soil was selected for experiment. Gene sequencing analysis identified CZ-6 as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. In order to understand the salt tolerant and disease-resistant effects of CZ-6 strain, determination of related indicators of salt tolerance, pathogen antagonistic tests, and anti-fungal mechanism analyses was carried out. A pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of CZ-6 inoculation on the rhizosphere microbial community of winter jujube. The salt tolerance test showed that CZ-6 strain can survive in a medium with a NaCl concentration of 10% and produces indole acetic acid (IAA) and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase. Studies on the inhibition mechanism of pathogenic fungi show that CZ-6 can secrete cellulase, protease, and xylanase. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis showed that CZ-6 can release volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including 2-heptanone and 2-nonanone. In addition, the strain can colonize the rhizosphere and migrate to the roots, stems, and leaves of winter jujube, which is essential for plant growth or defense against pathogens. Illumina MiSeq sequencing data indicated that, compared to the control, the abundance of salt-tolerant bacteria Tausonia in the CZ-6 strain treatment group was significantly increased, while the richness of Chaetomium and Gibberella pathogens was significantly reduced. Our research shows that CZ-6 has the potential as a biological control agent in saline soil. Plant damage and economic losses caused by pathogenic fungi and salt stress are expected to be alleviated by the addition of salt-tolerant antagonistic bacteria.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34611527 PMCID: PMC8487612 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5171086
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Inhibitory effect of CZ-6 strain on pathogenic fungi.
Figure 2Phylogenetic tree constructed by neighbor joining method. Bootstrap values are indicated on nodes.
Figure 3Inhibitory effect of VOCs produced by the CZ-6 strain on pathogenic fungi: (a) treatment group; (b) control group.
Volatile organic compounds produced by the CZ-6 strain and their functions.
| Serial number | Rt (min) | Components | Area (%) | PGP trait | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 4.647 | 2-Imidazolidinone | 1.12 | Not reported | |
| 3 | 6.242 | Silanediol, dimethyl- | 1.18 | Not reported | |
| 4 | 6.684 | Hydrazine, (2-methylpropyl)- | 39.52 | Not reported | |
| 6 | 7.669 | 3,4-Hexanediol, 2,5-dimethyl- | 1.02 | Not reported | |
| 8 | 8.293 | 2,3-Butanediol, [R-(R∗,R∗)]- | 4.17 | Growth-promoting | [ |
| 13 | 9.89 | Carbonic acid, monoamide | 4.51 | Not reported | |
| 18 | 10.962 | 2-Heptanone | 5.61 | Antagonism | [ |
| 34 | 14.701 | 2-Nonanone | 4.82 | Antagonism | [ |
| 35 | 14.889 | 2-Nonanol | 2.49 | Antagonism | Patent (CN201510866778.5) |
| 42 | 16.906 | 2-Dodecanone | 2.33 | Antagonism | Patent (CN201510866778.5) |
| 50 | 19.45 | 2-Undecanone | 2.39 | Nematocidal activities | [ |
| 51 | 19.574 | 2-Pentadecanol | 1.12 | Not reported | |
| 63 | 23.14 | 2-Tridecanone | 1.21 | Antagonism | [ |
Figure 4(a) The recovery result of the double antibiotic plate. The samples on the top line and on the bottom line are from uninoculated and inoculated plants, respectively. (b) The 1% agarose gel electrophoresis result of the recovered colony genome. M: Trans2K Trans DNA Marker; CZ-6: strain; RS: rhizosphere; R: root; S: stem; L: leaf.
Diversity and richness indices of the bacterial and fungal community from CZ-6 treatment and control groups.
| Index | Bacteria | Fungi | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | CZ-6 | CK | CZ-6 | |
| Shannon | 5.92 ± 0.18a | 5.95 ± 0.21a | 2.79 ± 0.08b | 2.34 ± 0.13a |
| Simpson | 0.007 ± 0.002a | 0.007 ± 0.002a | 0.12 ± 0.01b | 0.25 ± 0.03a |
| Ace | 1,578.18 ± 36.26a | 1,475.94 ± 126.45a | 176.56 ± 12.43a | 165.64 ± 24.48a |
| Chao | 1,559.80 ± 48.01a | 1,469.12 ± 109.98a | 175.78 ± 11.38a | 164.50 ± 23.97a |
| Coverage | 0.9896 | 0.9900 | 0.9996 | 0.9997 |
Values are means ± SD (n = 3). Means sharing a common letter within the same column are not significantly different at P < 0.05.
Figure 5The relative abundance of bacterial phyla (a) in the control groups and (b) in the CZ-6 treatment groups; the relative abundance of fungal phyla (c) in the control groups and (d) in the CZ-6 treatment groups.
Figure 6Relative abundance of bacteria on the order level (a) and fungi on genus level (b) from CZ-6 treatment and control groups. CK: control; T: treatment.
Figure 7Multifungal genera differences between the treatment groups. CK: control; T: treatment.