Sternal Retraction and Subclavian Vein Catheter Occlusion during Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Subclavian vein (SV) catheterization is a method for the delivery of fluids, drugs, and blood products, venous blood sampling, and central vein pressure monitoring in cardiac surgery. Catheter occlusion is a serious complication of SV catheterization during cardiac surgery, especially after sternal retractor expansion.
METHODS: In this observational study, 303 patients who had successful right infraclavicular SV catheterization from September 2019 to April 2020 were enrolled to determine the incidence of catheter occlusion. After catheterization, the lumens of all catheters were checked for the ability to infuse and withdraw blood from the catheter before and after sternal retractor expansion. The patients' characteristics, cannulation approach, on-pump or off-pump technique, occlusion of the catheter and its lumens, and any associated complications were recorded. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS ver. 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
RESULTS: Of the 303 patients studied, 205 were male (67.7%) and 98 were female (32.3%). Catheter occlusion occurred in 11 patients with on-pump cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (227 patients) and 4 patients with off-pump CPB (76 patients) (p=0.863). The incidence of catheter occlusion was 4.95% (15 of 303 patients) with no cases of simultaneous 3-lumen occlusion in a catheter. The most commonly occluded lumen was the distal lumen (57.92%). Simultaneous 2-lumen occlusion occurred in 4 patients. Catheter occlusion was found in 3 of 13 malpositioned catheters (23.07%).
CONCLUSION: The current study showed that malpositioning of the catheter tip was a risk factor for catheter occlusion and that the distal lumen of a triple-lumen catheter was the most commonly occluded lumen.

Introduction

Central venous catheterization is a routine component of modern cardiac surgery. At present, there are 2 main catheterization techniques (ultrasound-guided and anatomic landmark-based), both of which are used by physicians. Central venous catheterization is generally used for both hemodynamic monitoring (central venous pressure [CVP]) and the rapid administration of fluids and medications. Infraclavicular subclavian vein (SV) catheterization may sometimes be used for this purpose in cardiac surgery. As the catheter usually stays in place for more than a week, it causes patient discomfort (especially after internal jugular vein catheterization) [1-3]. In addition to routine internal jugular vein catheterization, SV catheterization is sometimes used at Farshchian Cardiovascular Hospital, Hamadan, Iran. It has some advantages, such as the cosmetic appearance of the neck (lack of a scar from the suture in the neck due to catheter fixation in internal jugular vein cannulation), ease of neck motion, lack of serious neurological damage in high-risk atherosclerotic cardiac patients due to the risk of inadvertent carotid artery puncture during internal jugular vein catheterization, a lower risk of infection, and improved nursing care in cardiac surgery. However, SV catheterization has a few well-known complications, such as inadvertent subclavian artery puncture, catheter tip malpositioning, hemothorax, pneumothorax, and catheter occlusion [4-6]. Catheter occlusion refers to the inability to infuse medications and fluids or withdraw fluids or blood from the catheter after sternal retractor expansion during cardiac surgery [3,6]. Catheter occlusion is a very important issue in patient management during cardiac surgery. However, few studies in the literature have addressed this issue. This gap in the research prompted us to investigate SV catheter occlusion after sternal retractor expansion during cardiac surgery.

Methods

The protocol of the present study was evaluated and approved by the Ethics Committee of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (IR.UMSHA.REC.1398.852).

After obtaining institutional ethical committee approval, this prospective observational study was conducted among 326 patients aged 25–89 years categorized as American Society of Anesthesiologists class II or III who underwent SV catheterization during cardiac surgery from September 2019 to April 2020. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before the study. The routine evaluation prior to catheterization included a chest X-ray and assessments of prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio (INR), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), and platelet count. The exclusion criteria included emergency surgery, left or supraclavicular SV catheterization, internal jugular vein catheterization, concurrent carotid endarterectomy, history of radiotherapy, blood coagulopathy (abnormal PT/PTT/INR or platelet count), hematoma or infection in the region of SV cannulation, a history of catheterization or surgery at the puncture site, and failure of infraclavicular SV catheterization. In all cases, SV catheterization was performed with the patient in the Trendelenburg position with the arms kept by the side after tracheal intubation. The patient was disconnected from mechanical ventilation during needle insertion. After 2 unsuccessful attempts (each skin puncture was defined as an attempt) of right infraclavicular SV catheterization, the patient was excluded from the study. Catheterization was carried out by right-handed physicians using the anatomic landmark-based technique (midpoint [MP] or lateral [LA] blind approach) according to the physician’s preference. The modified Selinger technique was used for the MP approach (puncture site: 1 to 2 cm beneath the MP of the clavicle) or the LA approach (1 to 2 cm LA to the midclavicular line) after puncturing the SV [7-9]. The length of all triple-lumen catheters was 20 cm for insertion. All catheters (7F, triple-lumen central catheters) were inserted to a depth of 15 cm from the skin. The return of venous blood into the syringe attached to the needle confirmed entry into the vessel. Then, all 3 lumens of the catheter were checked for blood aspiration. If blood aspiration was not successful, the catheter was pulled back slowly to the point that allowed free blood aspiration and then fixed at that level. Finally, the wing and the butterfly clamp of the catheter were sutured to the skin in a straight line (Fig. 1). A Cooley sternal retractor was used for expansion of the sternum in all patients. All lumens of the catheter were also rechecked for the ability to infuse and withdraw fluids or blood from the catheter before and after sternal retractor expansion during cardiac surgery. In all cardiac operations, heparin was used and the activated clotting time was checked and kept above 480 seconds in on-pump conditions and >300 seconds in off-pump conditions. A portable chest X-ray examination was performed in the intensive care unit immediately after surgery to evaluate potential complications and determine the position of the catheter tip. The variables analyzed in this study were age, sex, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), the cannulation approach, and probable complications such as malposition of the catheter tip, pneumothorax, hemothorax, subclavian arterial puncture, hematoma at the puncture site, and evaluation of the lumens of the catheters for the ability to infuse fluids or blood after sternal retractor expansion.

Fig. 1

Fixation of the suture of the wing (thick arrow) and butterfly clamp (narrow arrow) by the one time and conventional (classic) method to the skin in a straight line. A written informed consent for publication of this image was obtained from the patient.

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test showed the normality of continuous data. The chi-square test was used to evaluate differences between groups in categorical (qualitative) variables. Furthermore, the t-test was carried out to evaluate the differences between mean values of continuous variables. A p-value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. All statistical calculations were performed using IBM SPSS ver. 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Of the 326 cardiac patients who were initially enrolled in this study, 23 were excluded due to failure of right SV catheterization. Failure in 2 attempts occurred in 9 patients (5.2%) with the MP approach and 14 patients (10.7%) with the LA approach. Among the 303 included patients, 205 (67.7%) were men and 98 (32.3%) were women; their mean age was 61.59±11.33 years. The patients’ demographic information is shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Patient characteristics

Characteristic	MP group (n=173)	LA group (n=130)	Total (n=303)	p-value
Sex				0.315
Male	113	92	205
Female	60	38	98
Age (yr)	61.90±11.57	61.18±10.89	61.59±11.33	0.587
Weight (kg)	70.61±12.35	70.06±11.49	70.37±11.97	0.682
Height (cm)	163.51±11.11	163.64±8.71	163.57±10.13	0.911
Body mass index (kg/m2)	27.07±12.35	26.15±3.76	26.67±8.92	0.587

Values are presented as number or mean±standard deviation.

MP, midpoint approach; LA, lateral approach.

Puncture of the subclavian artery occurred in 7 patients: 4 using the MP approach and 3 using the LA approach. In 8 patients, pneumothorax occurred (6 using the MP approach and 2 using the LA approach).

Thirteen of the 303 catheters (9 using the MP approach and 4 using the LA approach) placed through the right SV were misplaced. In 8 of these 13 cases, the catheter tip was placed in the right internal jugular vein (6 using the MP approach and 2 using the LA approach). The other catheter tips (n=5) were placed in the left SV (3 using the MP approach and 2 using the LA approach). In 227 of the 303 patients (74.92%), cardiac surgery was performed with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (on-pump), while in 76 patients (25.08%) it was performed without CPB (off-pump). Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was performed in 257 patients (181 on-pump and 76 off-pump CABG). SV catheter occlusion occurred in 15 patients (4.95%) after sternal retractor expansion during cardiac surgery (11 in on-pump and 4 in off-pump cardiac surgery). There was no significant difference between SV catheter occlusion between on-pump and off-pump cardiac surgery (p=0.863). In only 1 patient, SV catheter occlusion occurred during simultaneous CABG and aortic valve replacement surgery. There was also no significant difference between the MP (6.94%) and LA approaches (5.38%) in terms of catheter occlusion (p=0.581) (Table 2). Catheter occlusion occurred in 19 lumens (6.27%). The most commonly occluded lumen was the distal lumen (57.92%). Simultaneous 2-lumen occlusion occurred in 4 patients (Table 3), but there were no cases of concurrent 3-lumen occlusion. SV catheter occlusion occurred in 3 of 13 malpositioned catheters (23.07%). Moreover, in 1 malpositioned catheter (right internal jugular vein), despite an inability to aspirate blood from the distal lumen, there was no inability to infuse medications and fluids. In 1 patient, proximal lumen occlusion occurred in the intensive care unit, not in the operating room. There was no significant relationship between BMI and lumen occlusion (p=0.319) (Table 4). Furthermore, there were no cases of thoracic duct injury, hematoma at the puncture site, or hemothorax after infraclavicular SV catheterization.

Table 2

Complications of catheterization

Complications	MP group	LA group	Total	p-value
Malposition	9 (5.20)	4 (3.08)	13 (6.27)	0.366
Subclavian artery puncture	4 (2.31)	3 (2.30)	7 (2.31)	0.998
Pneumothorax	6 (3.47)	2 (1.54)	8 (2.64)	0.739
Catheter occlusion	12 (6.94)	7 (5.38)	19 (6.27)	0.581

Values are presented as number (%).

MP, midpoint approach; LA, lateral approach.

Table 3

Lumen occlusion

Lumen occlusion	No. (%)
Distal (14G)	11 (57.92)
Medial (18G)	2 (10.52)
Proximal (18G)	2 (10.52)
Distal and medial	2 (10.52)
Distal and proximal	2 (10.52)
Total	19 (100.00)

Table 4

BMI and lumen occlusion

Variable	Lumen occlusion	No lumen occlusion	p-value
BMI (kg/m2)			0.319
<19 (n=10)	0	10 (3.08)
19–25 (n=117)	11 (9.4)	106 (90.6)
25–30 (n=123)	5 (4.1)	118 (95.9)
>30 (n=53)	3 (5.7)	50 (94.3)
Total (n=303)	19 (6.3)	284 (93.7)

Values are presented as number (%).

BMI, body mass index.

Discussion

In cardiac surgery, the ability to measure the CVP and infuse medications (especially inotropes) and fluids via a central vein catheter is an essential part of patient care in the operating room and intensive care unit. The SV remains attractive as a site for central venous cannulation due to its greater diameter, easy insertion, higher level of patient acceptance, and lower risk of catheter-associated infection and thrombosis than the femoral or internal jugular vein for some physicians. In addition, the point of insertion is in a wide, flat region of the chest that makes it ideal for use in central venous cannulation. Moreover, as the SV is suspended in the soft tissue underlying the clavicle bone, SV cannulation causes much less vein collapse than internal jugular cannulation. The consequences of vein collapse are back wall puncture, hemorrhage, hematoma, and extravenous placement of the dilator, guide wire or catheter [5,10-12].

Catheter occlusion is a cause of malfunction of the catheter. There are 3 degrees of occlusion. The first is termed partial occlusion (sluggish flow through the catheter and resistance to flushing and aspiration), the second is known as withdrawal occlusion (able to infuse fluids or blood without resistance and unable to withdraw blood) and the third is complete occlusion (unable to infuse or withdraw fluids or blood) [13,14]. Catheter occlusion can also be caused by either thrombotic or non-thrombotic events [15]. The non-thrombotic causes of catheter occlusion are kinking (folding of the catheter on itself) or bending of the catheter, fragmentation or fracture of the catheter, pinch-off syndrome (crimping of the catheter between clavicle and first rib), a tight suture, a catheter clamp accidentally left closed, and catheter malposition [16-18]. In addition to the above-mentioned causes, catheter occlusion in cardiac surgery can occur through external kinking of the catheter if the surgeon inadvertently places external pressure on the exposed catheter or kinking from the outward and upward pull created by the sternal retractor (similar to the anatomic deformity of the first rib in cases of thoracic outlet syndrome) [13,19].

Other factors could influence catheter occlusion during sternal retraction, such as the type of sternal retractor, obstruction related to low pH (hydrochloric acid, 0.1 mol/L) or high pH (sodium bicarbonate, 1.0 mol/L) drugs, the type of fixation of the catheter, and the length and type of the catheter [17,20].

After an extensive literature search, we found no study that focused on catheter occlusion following infraclavicular SV catheterization during cardiac surgery. However, catheter occlusion following SV cannulation was mentioned in a few studies. For example, Sofue et al. [16] stated that it was not possible to inject fluid via the central venous port (left and right subclavian or right internal jugular vein) in 15 of 1,546 oncologic patients (0.97%). The central venous ports were implanted via the right internal jugular vein (n=36), left SV (n=1,083), or right SV (n=427). Mantia et al. [19] investigated the relationship between sternal retraction and the incidence of permanent loss of pulmonary artery (PA) and CVP waveforms after sternal retractor expansion in 41 cardiac patients in 1988. They described the loss of the PA and CVP waveforms after sternal retractor expansion in 40% of left SV catheterizations (6 of 15) and 60% of right SV catheterizations (3 of 5). Thakur et al. [21] also reported 1 case of kinking of the catheter in 30 (3.33%) of elective or emergency surgery patients using the landmark-based infraclavicular SV technique. Kocum et al. [4] mentioned that it was difficult to infuse fluids via a central venous catheter (7F, 3-lumen, 20-cm) in 14 of 65 cardiac patients (21%) through the MP infraclavicular SV approach. They used a Morse sternal retractor for sternum expansion during cardiac surgery.

There have also been several reports about catheter occlusion due to knotting, bending, or kinking the catheter or its lumens. The catheter must be fixed straight, without any bends, to prevent kinking, especially for soft and flexible catheters [15,22,23]. The assessment of catheter occlusion involves inspecting the catheter and administration set for signs of kinked or clamped tubing, catheter tip malposition, loose tubing connections, and tight sutures. Chest X-ray is a valuable tool for assessing pinch-off syndrome and kinking or positioning of the catheter. The management of catheter occlusion involves repositioning the sternal retractor (if possible), resolving the kinking of the catheter, loosening tight stitches, and replacing the catheter [17,20,24]. In our study, catheter tip malposition was a risk for catheter occlusion (23.07%). In addition, as in a previous report, inability to aspirate blood from the lumen occurred in malpositioned catheters [25]. Therefore, negative findings for blood aspiration from any of the lumens must be considered a sign of catheter tip malposition. The incidence of catheter occlusion was 4.95%, and there were no cases of concurrent 3-lumen occlusion in the catheters. The discordant results across studies may be due to differences in the number of patients included in the studies, the point of catheterization, catheter characteristics, the type of sternal retractor, and the method of fixation and securing the catheter. A limitation of this study is that catheter occlusion was evaluated for cases of right SV catheterization, meaning that the study results may not apply to left SV catheterization. Moreover, we believe that further clinical trials and similar studies are needed at various cardiac surgery centers to evaluate SV catheter occlusion in cardiac surgery.

In conclusion, the findings of this study indicated that the distal lumen of the triple catheter (20 cm) was the most commonly occluded lumen and that none of the catheters simultaneously had 3 occluded lumens. Moreover, malpositioning of the catheter tip was a serious risk factor for catheter occlusion. Ultimately, because all catheter lumens are commonly used during surgery (for rapid administration of drugs, blood products, and fluids), patency of the lumens is critical. Therefore, if physicians consider infraclavicular SV catheterization for cardiac surgery, they must be aware of this serious complication.