| Literature DB >> 34610982 |
Sharmaine Thirunavukarasu1,2, Nicholas Jex1,2, Amrit Chowdhary1,2, Imtiaz Ul Hassan1, Sam Straw2, Thomas P Craven1,2, Miroslawa Gorecka1,2, David Broadbent3, Peter Swoboda1, Klaus K Witte2, Richard M Cubbon2, Hui Xue4, Peter Kellman4, John P Greenwood1,2, Sven Plein1,2, Eylem Levelt5,2.
Abstract
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events and hospitalization for heart failure (HF) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Using CV MRI (CMR) and 31P-MRS in a longitudinal cohort study, we aimed to investigate the effects of the selective SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin on myocardial energetics and cellular volume, function, and perfusion. Eighteen patients with T2D underwent CMR and 31P-MRS scans before and after 12 weeks' empagliflozin treatment. Plasma N-terminal prohormone B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels were measured. Ten volunteers with normal glycemic control underwent an identical scan protocol at a single visit. Empagliflozin treatment was associated with significant improvements in phosphocreatine-to-ATP ratio (1.52 to 1.76, P = 0.009). This was accompanied by a 7% absolute increase in the mean left ventricular ejection fraction (P = 0.001), 3% absolute increase in the mean global longitudinal strain (P = 0.01), 8 mL/m2 absolute reduction in the mean myocardial cell volume (P = 0.04), and 61% relative reduction in the mean NT-proBNP (P = 0.05) from baseline measurements. No significant change in myocardial blood flow or diastolic strain was detected. Empagliflozin thus ameliorates the "cardiac energy-deficient" state, regresses adverse myocardial cellular remodeling, and improves cardiac function, offering therapeutic opportunities to prevent or modulate HF in T2D.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34610982 PMCID: PMC8660983 DOI: 10.2337/db21-0270
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes ISSN: 0012-1797 Impact factor: 9.461
Figure 1Study flowchart. Thirty prospective T2D patients who were considered for empagliflozin treatment at the cardiometabolic optimization clinic of the Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (LTHT) were screened for the study. Twenty-four prospective patients were recruited between February 2020 and September 2020, and the final patient visit occurred in January 2021. Eighteen patients then successfully completed 12 weeks of empagliflozin treatment within the time frame and underwent a second 31P-MRS and CMR scan. There were no changes to any of the patients’ preexisting medications throughout the study.
Figure 2Multiparametric scan protocol. Multiparametric MRI included cardiac 31P-MRS (20 min). This was followed by CMR, which included cine imaging to assess LV volumes, mass and ejection fraction, and strain parameters; native precontrast and postcontrast T1 mapping for measuring myocardial cellular volume and ECV; adenosine stress perfusion imaging for assessment of myocardial rest and stress blood flow and myocardial perfusion reserve; LGE imaging for assessment of myocardial scarring and infarction. Control subjects underwent identical MRI protocols at a single visit. The same scan protocol was repeated for patients with T2D after 12 weeks of empagliflozin treatment with an identical second scan protocol.
Baseline clinical characteristics of the study cohort
| Variable | Control subjects ( | T2D patients ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 67 ± 9 | 67 ± 11 | 1 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 28 ± 2 | 29 ± 4 | 0.9 |
| Male | 8 (80) | 13 (72) | 0.5 |
| Diabetes duration, years | — | 11 ± 8 | — |
| Smoking | 2 (20) | 8 (45) | 0.2 |
| Heart rate, bpm | 62 ± 9 | 66 ± 10 | 0.3 |
| Systolic BP, mmHg | 139 ± 16 | 134 ± 13 | 0.8 |
| Diastolic BP, mmHg | 77 ± 7 | 79 ± 7 | 0.5 |
| Hemoglobin, g/L | 145 ± 11 | 140 ± 17 | 0.41 |
| Hematocrit, L/L | 0.45 ± 0.03 | 0.43 ± 0.05 | 0.26 |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 5.3 ± 1.6 | 4.4 ± 1.2 | 0.1 |
| HDL, mmol/L | 1.7 ± 0.45 | 1.36 ± 0.37 | 0.03 |
| LDL, mmol/L | 3.01 ± 1.29 | 2.31 ± 1.13 | 0.1 |
| TG, mmol/L | 1.33 ± 0.65 | 2.46 ± 1.63 | 0.05 |
| Creatinine, μmol/L | 71 ± 9.6 | 77 ± 22 | 0.4 |
| eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 83 ± 9 | 71 ± 37 | 0.3 |
| HbA1c, mmol/mol; % | 38 ± 2; 6 ± 0.2 | 60 ± 13; 7.6 ± 1.2 | 0.0001 |
| Insulin, pmol/L | 35 ± 29 | 139 ± 126 | 0.02 |
| NT-proBNP, ng/L | 135 (35–156) | 199 (40–1,289) | 0.3 |
| CV disease history | |||
| CAD | 4 (40) | 8 (44) | 0.8 |
| Prior MI | 4 (40) | 8 (44) | 0.8 |
| PCI | 4 (40) | 5 (28) | 0.5 |
| CABG | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 |
| Hypertension | 6 (60) | 15 (83) | 0.2 |
| Stroke | 0 (0) | 1 (6) | 0.4 |
| Medications | |||
| Metformin | 0 (0) | 15 (83) | |
| Sulfonylurea | 0 (0) | 2 (11) | |
| Gliptin | 0 (0) | 1 (6) | |
| Thiazolidinediones | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| GLP-1RA | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Aspirin | 6 (60) | 13 (72) | |
| Statins | 7 (70) | 18 (100) | |
| ACEI | 6 (60) | 12 (66) | |
| ARB | 0 (0) | 6 (33) |
Data are means ± SD or median (IQR) for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables. ACEI, ACE inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; GLP-1RA, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; TG, triglyceride.
Baseline comparison of CMR findings
| Variable | Control subjects ( | T2D patients ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| LVEDV (mL) | 149 ± 41 | 163 ± 50 | 0.5 |
| LVEDV index (mL/m2) | 80 ± 17 | 86 ± 27 | 0.5 |
| LVESV (mL) | 54 ± 16 | 83 ± 45 | 0.06 |
| LVESV index (mL/m2) | 29 ± 7 | 44 ± 25 | 0.07 |
| LV stroke volume (mL) | 95 ± 27 | 81 ± 20 | 0.13 |
| LVEF (%) | 63 ± 4 | 52 ± 13 | 0.01 |
| LV mass (g) | 100 ± 29 | 119 ± 33 | 0.1 |
| LV mass index (g/m2) | 53 ± 12 | 61 ± 15 | 0.2 |
| LV mass–to–LVEDV ratio (g/mL) | 0.64 ± 0.09 | 0.76 ± 0.27 | 0.2 |
| RV end diastolic volume (mL) | 156 ± 43 | 151 ± 34 | 0.7 |
| RV end diastolic volume index (mL/m2) | 84 ± 18 | 79 ± 19 | 0.5 |
| RV end systolic volume (mL) | 65 ± 20 | 71 ± 25 | 0.5 |
| RV end systolic volume index (mL/m2) | 35 ± 9 | 38 ± 15 | 0.57 |
| RV stroke volume (mL) | 92 ± 26 | 78 ± 17 | 0.09 |
| RV ejection fraction (%) | 59 ± 5 | 53 ± 9 | 0.06 |
| Peak circumferential strain (%) | −21 ± 2 | −17 ± 4 | 0.01 |
| GLS (%) | −14 ± 3 | −10 ± 3 | 0.002 |
| Peak diastolic circumferential strain rate (1/s) | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Peak diastolic longitudinal strain rate (1/s) | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.2 |
| LA maximum volume index (mL/m2) | 35 ± 15 | 30 ± 16 | 0.8 |
| LA ejection fraction (%) | 58 ± 11 | 48 ± 13 | 0.05 |
| Native T1 (ms) | 1,241 ± 83 | 1,285 ± 104 | 0.2 |
| Extracellular volume (%) | 25 ± 3 | 25 ± 3 | 1 |
| Cell volume (mL/m2) | 75 ± 22 | 91 ± 30 | 0.15 |
| MBF, rest (mL/g/min) | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 1 |
| MBF, stress (mL/g/min) | 2.0 ± 0.5 | 1.6 ± 0.5 | 0.05 |
| MPRI | 3.3 ± 0.9 | 2.9 ± 1.5 | 0.4 |
Data are means ± SD. MPRI, myocardial perfusion index; RV, right ventricular.
Changes in clinical parameters after empagliflozin treatment
| Variable | Baseline ( | Follow-up ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| BMI, kg/m2 | 29 ± 4 | 27 ± 4 | 0.09 |
| Heart rate, bpm | 66 ± 10 | 60 ± 9 | 0.02 |
| Systolic BP, mmHg | 134 ± 13 | 120 ± 13 | 0.001 |
| Diastolic BP, mmHg | 79 ± 7 | 74 ± 6 | 0.01 |
| Hemoglobin, g/L | 140 ± 17 | 142 ± 19 | 0.17 |
| Hematocrit, L/L | 0.43 ± 0.05 | 0.44 ± 0.05 | 0.03 |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 4.4 ± 1.2 | 4.5 ± 1.5 | 0.6 |
| HDL, mmol/L | 1.36 ± 0.37 | 1.28 ± 0.35 | 0.06 |
| LDL, mmol/L | 2.31 ± 1.13 | 2.11 ± 1.23 | 0.3 |
| TG, mmol/L | 2.46 ± 1.63 | 2.32 ± 1.26 | 0.7 |
| Creatinine, μmol/L | 77 ± 22 | 81 ± 19 | 0.4 |
| eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 71 ± 37 | 70 ± 36 | 0.5 |
| HbA1c, mmol/mol; % | 60 ± 13; 7.6 ± 1.2 | 56 ± 9; 7.2 ± 0.8 | 0.3 |
| Insulin, pmol/L | 139 ± 126 | 175 ± 143 | 0.4 |
| NT-proBNP, ng/L | 199 (40–1,289) | 118 (58–409) | 0.05 |
| Medications | |||
| Metformin | 15 (83) | 15 (83) | 1 |
| Sulfonylurea | 2 (11) | 2 (11) | 1 |
| Gliptin | 1 (6) | 1 (6) | 1 |
| Thiazolidinediones | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 |
| Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 |
| Aspirin | 13 (72) | 13 (72) | 1 |
| Statin | 18 (100) | 18 (100) | 1 |
| ACEI | 12 (66) | 12 (66) | 1 |
| ARB | 6 (33) | 6 (33) | 1 |
Data are means ± SD or median (IQR) for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables. ACEI, ACE inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; TG, triglyceride.
Changes in CMR findings with empagliflozin treatment
| Variable | Baseline ( | Follow-up ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| LVEDV (mL) | 164 ± 50 | 149 ± 38 | 0.02 |
| LVEDV index (mL/m2) | 86 ± 27 | 79 ± 21 | 0.02 |
| LVESV (mL) | 83 ± 45 | 65 ± 39 | 0.001 |
| LVESV index (mL/m2) | 44 ± 25 | 35 ± 21 | 0.001 |
| LV stroke volume (mL) | 81 ± 20 | 84 ± 16 | 0.39 |
| LVEF (%) | 52 ± 13 | 59 ± 15 | 0.001 |
| LV mass (g) | 119 ± 33 | 109 ± 29 | 0.06 |
| LV mass index (g/m2) | 61 ± 15 | 56 ± 12 | 0.07 |
| LV mass–to–LVEDV ratio (g/mL) | 0.76 ± 0.27 | 0.75 ± 0.18 | 0.6 |
| RV end diastolic volume (mL) | 151 ± 34 | 155 ± 32 | 0.5 |
| RV end diastolic volume index (mL/m2) | 79 ± 19 | 83 ± 24 | 0.3 |
| RV end systolic volume (mL) | 71 ± 25 | 76 ± 27 | 0.4 |
| RV end systolic volume index (mL/m2) | 38 ± 15 | 41 ± 22 | 0.4 |
| RV stroke volume (mL) | 78 ± 11 | 80 ± 12 | 0.7 |
| RV ejection fraction (%) | 53 ± 9 | 53 ± 11 | 0.9 |
| Peak circumferential strain (%) | −17.4 ± 4.1 | −18.8 ± 4.9 | 0.3 |
| GLS (%) | −10.2 ± 2.9 | −13.1 ± 4.1 | 0.01 |
| Peak diastolic circumferential strain rate (1/s) | 1 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 0.4 |
| Peak diastolic longitudinal strain rate (1/s) | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.9 |
| LA maximum volume indexed (mL/m2) | 30 ± 16 | 28 ± 11 | 0.9 |
| LA ejection fraction (%) | 48 ± 13 | 48 ± 15 | 0.2 |
| Native T1 (ms) | 1,285 ± 104 | 1,310 ± 42 | 0.6 |
| Extracellular volume (%) | 24 ± 3 | 25 ± 3 | 0.1 |
| Cell volume (mL/m2) | 92 ± 30 | 84 ± 27 | 0.04 |
| MBF, rest (mL/g/min) | 0.62 ± 0.3 | 0.66 ± 0.3 | 0.4 |
| MBF, stress (mL/g/min) | 1.6 ± 0.5 | 1.4 ± 0.3 | 0.08 |
| MPR | 2.9 ± 1.5 | 2.3 ± 0.8 | 0.06 |
Data are means ± SD. MPR, myocardial perfusion reserve; RV, right ventricular.
Figure 3Comparisons of myocardial PCr-to-ATP ratio (PCr/ATP) between patients with T2D and control subjects at baseline and the changes in PCr-to-ATP ratio before and after 12 weeks’ empagliflozin treatment. ns, non-significant. **P = 0.002 between control subjects and baseline; P = 0.009 between baseline and 3-month follow-up.
Figure 4Comparisons of LVEF between patients with T2D and control subjects at baseline and the changes in LVEF before and after 12 weeks’ empagliflozin treatment. ns, non-significant. *P = 0.01; ****P = 0.001.