Shivanna Puneeth1, Madhivanan Karthigeyan1, Pravin Salunke2, Chirag Panchal1, Mandeep Singh Kataria1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India. Electronic address: drpravin_salunke@yahoo.co.uk.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Patients with instability because of congenital craniovertebral anomalies often have complex C1-C2 osseovascular anomalies. C2 nerve root sacrifice has been described to address such difficult anatomy during posterior C1-C2 fixation and has its own downsides. Its preservation as a recent alternative poses greater surgical challenge, and the considerations differ from other causes of craniovertebral junctional instability; the pertaining outcomes have been scarcely studied. The objective of this study was to prospectively determine the feasibility and outcomes related to C2 nerve root preservation in patients with congenital atlantoaxial dislocation (CAAD) after posterior C1-C2 fixation. METHODS: In this observational study, 63 patients (126 nerve roots) with CAAD after posterior fixation were prospectively assessed. Underlying osseovascular anomalies affecting the feasibility of C2 nerve root preservation, and C2 nerve-related dysfunction at 12 months follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall C2 nerve root preservation rate was 89.7%. Even in the presence of extreme joint obliquity/spondyloptosis and anomalous vertebral artery, it was feasible in about three fourths. After preservation, 28.3% patients developed new-onset C2 nerve root dysfunction: neuralgia in 2, dysesthesia in 6, and hypoesthesia/paresthesia in 9. The symptoms were not disabling in most patients. CONCLUSIONS: In most patients with CAAD, C2 nerve root preservation is feasible despite an aberrant bony and vascular anatomy. A few patients after nerve root preservation develop related symptoms that are conservatively manageable, with no significant adverse consequences. Given the controversy in the literature on C2 nerve sacrifice-related outcomes, we favor an attempt at C2 nerve root preservation.
OBJECTIVE: Patients with instability because of congenital craniovertebral anomalies often have complex C1-C2 osseovascular anomalies. C2 nerve root sacrifice has been described to address such difficult anatomy during posterior C1-C2 fixation and has its own downsides. Its preservation as a recent alternative poses greater surgical challenge, and the considerations differ from other causes of craniovertebral junctional instability; the pertaining outcomes have been scarcely studied. The objective of this study was to prospectively determine the feasibility and outcomes related to C2 nerve root preservation in patients with congenital atlantoaxial dislocation (CAAD) after posterior C1-C2 fixation. METHODS: In this observational study, 63 patients (126 nerve roots) with CAAD after posterior fixation were prospectively assessed. Underlying osseovascular anomalies affecting the feasibility of C2 nerve root preservation, and C2 nerve-related dysfunction at 12 months follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall C2 nerve root preservation rate was 89.7%. Even in the presence of extreme joint obliquity/spondyloptosis and anomalous vertebral artery, it was feasible in about three fourths. After preservation, 28.3% patients developed new-onset C2 nerve root dysfunction: neuralgia in 2, dysesthesia in 6, and hypoesthesia/paresthesia in 9. The symptoms were not disabling in most patients. CONCLUSIONS: In most patients with CAAD, C2 nerve root preservation is feasible despite an aberrant bony and vascular anatomy. A few patients after nerve root preservation develop related symptoms that are conservatively manageable, with no significant adverse consequences. Given the controversy in the literature on C2 nerve sacrifice-related outcomes, we favor an attempt at C2 nerve root preservation.