Literature DB >> 34610240

Measurement of the Free-Base Nicotine Fraction (αfb) in Electronic Cigarette Liquids by Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction.

James F Pankow1, Wentai Luo1, Kevin J McWhirter1, Christopher S Motti1, Clifford H Watson2.   

Abstract

A method for determining the fraction of free-base nicotine (αfb) in electronic cigarette liquids ("e-liquids") based on headspace solid-phase microextraction (h-SPME) is described. The free-base concentration ce,fb = αfbce,T, where ce,T is the total (free-base + protonated) nicotine in the liquid. For gas/liquid equilibrium of the volatile free-base form, the headspace nicotine concentration is proportional to ce,fb and thus also to αfb. Headspace nicotine is proportionally absorbed with an SPME fiber. The fiber is thermally desorbed in the heated inlet of a gas chromatograph coupled to a mass spectrometer: the desorbed nicotine is measured by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. For a second h-SPME measurement, an adequate base is added to the sample vial to convert essentially all protonated nicotine to the free-base form (αfb → 1.0). The ratio of the first h-SPME measurement to the second h-SPME measurement gives αfb in the initial sample. Using gaseous ammonia as the added base, the method was (1) verified using lab-prepared e-liquid solutions with known αfb values and (2) used to determine the αfb values for 18 commercial e-liquids. The measured αfb values ranged from 0.0 to 1.0. Increasing measurement error with decreasing αfb caused modestly lower method precision at small αfb. Adding a liquid organic base may be more convenient than adding gaseous ammonia: one of the samples was examined using triethylamine as the added base; the measurements agreed well (with ammonia, 0.27 ± 0.01; with triethylamine, 0.26 ± 0.04). Other workers have proposed examining the nicotine protonation state in e-liquids using three steps: (1) 1:10 dilution with CO2-free water; (2) measurement of pH; and (3) calculation of the resulting values for αfb,w,1:10, the free-base fraction in the diluted mostly aqueous phase. As expected and verified here, because of the generally greater abilities of organic acids to protonate nicotine in water versus in an e-liquid phase, αfb,w,1:10 values can be significantly less than actual e-liquid αfb values when αfb is not close to either 0 or 1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34610240      PMCID: PMC9230963          DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.1c00285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.973


  18 in total

1.  Headspace analysis of engine oil by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.

Authors:  D M Levermore; M Josowicz; W S Rees; J Janata
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Critical evaluation of methodology commonly used in sample collection, storage and preparation for the analysis of pharmaceuticals and illicit drugs in surface water and wastewater by solid phase extraction and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  David R Baker; Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 4.759

3.  Solid-phase microextraction-based approach to determine free-base nicotine in trapped mainstream cigarette smoke total particulate matter.

Authors:  Clifford H Watson; Jenna S Trommel; David L Ashley
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 5.279

4.  Nicotine nasal spray and vapor inhaler: abuse liability assessment.

Authors:  K J Schuh; L M Schuh; J E Henningfield; M L Stitzer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Rapid Determination of Ionization Constants (pK a) by UV Spectroscopy Using 96-Well Microtiter Plates.

Authors:  Carlos H Ríos Martínez; Christophe Dardonville
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 4.345

6.  Calculating Compound Dependent Gas-Droplet Distributions in Aerosols of Propylene Glycol and Glycerol from Electronic Cigarettes.

Authors:  James F Pankow
Journal:  J Aerosol Sci       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.433

7.  Solid phase microextraction for quantitative headspace sampling of apple volatiles.

Authors:  A J Matich; D D Rowan; N H Banks
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Percent free base nicotine in the tobacco smoke particulate matter of selected commercial and reference cigarettes.

Authors:  James F Pankow; Ameer D Tavakoli; Wentai Luo; Lorne M Isabelle
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 9.  Oral somatosensory awareness.

Authors:  Patrick Haggard; Lieke de Boer
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Olfactory and trigeminal interaction of menthol and nicotine in humans.

Authors:  Bertold Renner; Karen Schreiber
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.